JB/149/223/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/149/223/003: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/149/223/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/149/223/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>been alledged – if the suitors were really<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<add>so much</add> delayed he could hardly conceive that<lb/>
 
the office should be a sinecure.  If such<lb/>
 
was the nature of the evil here<lb/>
 
was a channel opened to the suitors<lb/>
for getting forwrd which, no doubt,<lb/>
they would be disposed to accept.<lb/>
<del><gap/> committee of that</del>  He did not<lb/>
think the Committee now applied<lb/>
for likely to furnish much information<lb/>
– and, without much objection to<lb/>
such a committee however, he was<lb/>
disposed to want to see what <del>precise</del><lb/>
precise remedy the house of Lords<lb/>
<del>would</del> should propose. – In the view<lb/>
of his hon. and learned friend indeed<lb/>
it was reasonable that a committee<lb/>
should be appointed, for his objection<lb/>
went to the whole of the regulation<lb/>
<del>contained</del> recommended in the Report<lb/>
and his object was to prepare a<lb/>
remedy of <del>an</del> another description.  But<lb/>
that view he held to be erroneous<lb/>
and thought this regulation would<lb/>
at least go a great way to <del>remedy</del><lb/>
<add>correct</add> the evil.  Such being his opinion he<lb/>
should certain oppose the motion.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:51, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

been alledged – if the suitors were really
so much delayed he could hardly conceive that
the office should be a sinecure. If such
was the nature of the evil here
was a channel opened to the suitors
for getting forwrd which, no doubt,
they would be disposed to accept.
committee of that He did not
think the Committee now applied
for likely to furnish much information
– and, without much objection to
such a committee however, he was
disposed to want to see what precise
precise remedy the house of Lords
would should propose. – In the view
of his hon. and learned friend indeed
it was reasonable that a committee
should be appointed, for his objection
went to the whole of the regulation
contained recommended in the Report
and his object was to prepare a
remedy of an another description. But
that view he held to be erroneous
and thought this regulation would
at least go a great way to remedy
correct the evil. Such being his opinion he
should certain oppose the motion.


Identifier: | JB/149/223/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 149.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

149

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

223

Info in main headings field

Image

003

Titles

1825 or 1826 / on the report of the commission for enquiring / into the state of the / court of chancery

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c6 / / /

Penner

Watermarks

iping 1810

Marginals

Paper Producer

bernardino rivadavia

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1810

Notes public

ID Number

50077

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in