JB/159/163/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/159/163/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/163/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/163/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>5</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><head>Mutilation.</head></p>
 
<p><note><del>No</del> Mischiefs it<lb/>
 
produces.</note><lb/>
As to the mischiefs of Mutilation, over and above<lb/>
the organical pain, these are those of Disablement<lb/>
and Disfigurement united.</p>
<p><note>Notion annexed to it<lb/>
by English Lawyers.</note><lb/>
The <del>deposition</del> <add>notion</add> here given of Mutilation,<lb/>
<del>commonness</del> is not very different from that<lb/>
which our Lawyers <del>of</del> give of Maiming, or<lb/>
as they write it Mayhem;  of which they give<lb/>
a definition <add>considered</add> as being the appellative of a species<lb/>
of Crime.  It comes as near it as any notion well<lb/>
can so as to be consistent with itself.<hi rend="superscript">[a]</hi></p>
[a]  NOTE<lb/>
<p>According to Lord Coke,† <note>† 1 Inst. 126.b.</note> <foreign><unclear>Mayhemism est membri mutilatio;  I membrum est pars corporis habens<lb/>
destruatam operationem in corpore."</unclear></foreign>  This<lb/>
agrees pretty well with the above definition.<lb/>
He goes on and says:  <foreign><unclear>"Mayhemism vero dici potent<lb/>
ab abigous in abquâ parti suȓ corporis <add>effectus suȓ</add> inubbbi,<lb/>
ad <hi rend="underline">puguandum.</hi></unclear></foreign>  <del>This <add>latter part</add> trows the matter<lb/><add>altogether</add> into</del>  Confusion begins to gather.
</p>
<p><note>1 Irish 288.a</note><lb/>
The same Lord Coke in another part of the same<lb/>
book tell us that Mayhem signifieth a corporal <lb/>
hurt whereby a man looseth a member by reason whereof <lb/>
he is less able to fight. <del>as by</del>  According to the same<lb/>
Lord Coke <del>in the</del> a man looseth a member and is<lb/>
<del>in</del> <add>thereby</add> rendered less able to fight in <add>by any of</add> the following cases: <add>means</add>  1<lb/> <del>when</del> <add>by having</add> his eye put out:<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note>⊞ by having his<lb/><hi rend="underline">foreteeth</hi> beaten out:</note>  3. by having his <hi rend="underline">scull</hi><lb/>
broken.  4. by having his arm hand, finger, let or<lb/>
foot</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 16:07, 30 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

5

Mutilation.

No Mischiefs it
produces.

As to the mischiefs of Mutilation, over and above
the organical pain, these are those of Disablement
and Disfigurement united.

Notion annexed to it
by English Lawyers.

The deposition notion here given of Mutilation,
commonness is not very different from that
which our Lawyers of give of Maiming, or
as they write it Mayhem; of which they give
a definition considered as being the appellative of a species
of Crime. It comes as near it as any notion well
can so as to be consistent with itself.[a]

[a] NOTE

According to Lord Coke,† † 1 Inst. 126.b. Mayhemism est membri mutilatio; I membrum est pars corporis habens
destruatam operationem in corpore."
This
agrees pretty well with the above definition.
He goes on and says: "Mayhemism vero dici potent
ab abigous in abquâ parti suȓ corporis effectus suȓ inubbbi,
ad puguandum.
This latter part trows the matter
altogether into
Confusion begins to gather.

1 Irish 288.a
The same Lord Coke in another part of the same
book tell us that Mayhem signifieth a corporal
hurt whereby a man looseth a member by reason whereof
he is less able to fight. as by According to the same
Lord Coke in the a man looseth a member and is
in thereby rendered less able to fight in by any of the following cases: means 1
when by having his eye put out: ⊞ by having his
foreteeth beaten out:
3. by having his scull
broken. 4. by having his arm hand, finger, let or
foot



Identifier: | JB/159/163/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 159.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

159

Main Headings

punishment

Folio number

163

Info in main headings field

mutilation

Image

001

Titles

mischief it produces / note / text / pseudo-mutilation

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f5 / f6 / f7 / f8

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

caroline vernon

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

53986

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in