JB/550/278/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/550/278/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1<lb/>
 
17<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> Oct: 1795 &#x2014;<lb/>
 
M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Bentham's Replies &amp; Observations, occasioned<lb/>
by M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Sollicitor General's Queries &amp; Corrections<lb/>
made to the Draught of the Penitentiary Contract</head>
<del><p>The object of these observations is to endeavour to<lb/>
confirm if necessary in M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Soll:<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> Gen:<hi rend="superscript"><!-- underline -->ls</hi> mind the<lb/>
opinion of the propriety of the amendment he has<lb/>
been pleased to make, in exclusion of the alternative<lb/>
that had at first suggested itself to him.</p></del>
<p>Art. 4. &sect;° 5 &amp; Art. 4 &sect;° 10&#x2014; With respect to the<lb/>
power of Assignment M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> B submits to the<lb/>
amendment with becoming deference: it confirms<lb/>
but too well the apprehension he had himself<lb/>
conceived. &#x2014; All he has to pray is, that it may<lb/>
be permitted to stand unclogged with the doubt<lb/>
suggested, &amp; the alternative proposed, in the margin<lb/>
of &sect;° 5: &amp; that the note there which appears<lb/>
to have been already cancelled in idea, by the decision<lb/>
implied by the entry made of the amendment in <lb/>
&sect;° 10, may accordingly be cancelled by the pen.<lb/>
Should there be any difficulty about this, he must<lb/>
pray that the sealed paper may be read <add>Art 1 &#x2014;</add></p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:52, 18 May 2020

Click Here To Edit

1
17th Oct: 1795 —
Mr Bentham's Replies & Observations, occasioned
by Mr Sollicitor General's Queries & Corrections
made to the Draught of the Penitentiary Contract

The object of these observations is to endeavour to
confirm if necessary in Mr Soll:s Gen:ls mind the
opinion of the propriety of the amendment he has
been pleased to make, in exclusion of the alternative
that had at first suggested itself to him.

Art. 4. §° 5 & Art. 4 §° 10— With respect to the
power of Assignment Mr B submits to the
amendment with becoming deference: it confirms
but too well the apprehension he had himself
conceived. — All he has to pray is, that it may
be permitted to stand unclogged with the doubt
suggested, & the alternative proposed, in the margin
of §° 5: & that the note there which appears
to have been already cancelled in idea, by the decision
implied by the entry made of the amendment in
§° 10, may accordingly be cancelled by the pen.
Should there be any difficulty about this, he must
pray that the sealed paper may be read Art 1 —



Identifier: | JB/550/278/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 550.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

550

Main Headings

Folio number

278

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in