JB/095/057/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/095/057/001: Difference between revisions

RexL (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
<head>17</head>
<head>17</head>
<head>TURNPIKE ACT 7 G3. 40 Observations on</head>
<head>TURNPIKE ACT 7 G3. 40 Observations on</head>
<head>34 &sect; 34</head>


<!-- NB: NOTES ARE BEING TYPED UP FIRST. THIS FOLIO WILL BE TYPED UP PIECEMEAL AND REARRANGED ONCE SOME SENSE HAS BEEN MADE OF INDIVIDUAL SENTENCES.  IT WILL THEREFORE BE RATHER MESSY FOR SOME CONSIDERBLE TIME UNTIL COMPLETED. -->
<note>Unsteady<lb/>
expression</note>  


<p><del>By the</del> <add>to <hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi>:</add>  34<hi rend='superscript'>4</hi>  <del>Every person is to take an</del> <add>to hold that the</add> Oath <del>of</del><lb/>
<del>Qualification</del> <add>is to be taken by a man <del>bef</del></add> before he acts as a <hi rend='underline'>Trustee</hi>: and if he is<lb/>
<del>the only <gap/> to <gap/> <gap/> of the <unclear>Deft</unclear></del> is<lb/>
<del>prosecuted for acting unqualified</del> , <add>the</add> proof <add>is to be</add> that he has acted<lb/>
as a <hi rend='underline'>Commissioner</hi>.  <del><!-- one or two words? --><gap/> <gap/> be the only evidence required</del><lb/>
<hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi><lb/>
<note><hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <del>In every other or<lb/>
almost every other<lb/>
place where the <unclear>use</unclear><lb/>
of <unclear>these</unclear><!-- or, 'those' --> two words<lb/>
"Trustee" &amp; "Commissioner"<lb/>
<sic>occurrs</sic> <add>is <gap/> <gap/></add> , the<lb/>
other is inserted also</del></note><lb/>
<del>on the part <add><gap/></add> of the <gap/> <unclear>Deft</unclear>.</del></p>


under construction ...
<p><hi rend='superscript'>[][]</hi>  If <del>"Trustee" &amp; "Commissioner</del> <add>they are</add> <del><gap/></del> <add><del>Terms</del> not</add> <del>perfectly convertible<lb/>
Terms , <gap/> <gap/> is faulty : if they are<lb/>
<unclear>one</unclear> of them is</del> <add>in <del>every other</del> clause</add> <del>superfluous</del>.</p>


to <gap/>: 34 <!-- symbol --> 34
<p>It is enough to make a person stare who is not perfectly<lb/>
<lb/>
apprized of the identity of the two <unclear>terms</unclear>, &amp; consequently<lb/>
By the 34<hi rend='superscript'>th</hi>  <del>Every person is to take <add>to <gap/></add> an <add><gap/> the</add> Oath of</del>  
of the redundancy of one of them <add>[1]</add><!-- 1 in square box --></p>
<lb/>
<del>Qualification</del> <add>is to be taken by a man <del><gap/></del></add> before he acts as a <hi rend='underline'>Trustee</hi>: and if he is
<lb/>
<del>prosecuted for acting unqualified</del> <add>the</add> proof <add>is to be</add> that he has acted
<lb/>
as <hi rend='underline'><gap/> <gap/></hi>.


<lb/></p>
<note>Indeed this is the only<lb/>
 
passage in the whole<lb/>
<p>
Act <add>which upon consideration</add> <add>the convertibility of the two terms</add> that make it<lb/>
for
perfectly apparent to persons unexperienced <add>in the <gap/></add>: who seeing <del>these</del> terms the one <add>alone <sic>employd</sic></add> sometimes<lb/>
<del>the only <gap/> to <gap/> <gap/> of the <gap/> is</del>
<!-- unclear whether the next 7 words are struck out or underlined -->that the two terms are absolutely convertible both might be apt to suspect some<lb/>
 
The other of these <sic>employ'd</sic> sometimes<lb/>
 
unknown difference in the functions and powers of persons thus differently<lb/>
<!-- underconstruction...............................
denominated</note>
.............. -->
</p>
 
 
 
 
.......under construction ............
 
 
<p><note><head>Unsteady expression</head>
Indeed this is the only passage in the whole <unclear>lot</unclear> that makes it perfectly apparent to persons <unclear>inexperienced</unclear>
 
<add><gap/>added text that <gap/> it</add><gap/> upon consideration <add>the <gap/></add> not that where it <unclear>perfectly</unclear> appeared to persons <gap/> <del>that the two terms are absolute <gap/><gap/></del> <unclear>the</unclear> other of these <gap/> a unknown difference in the <gap/> <gap/>.</note></p>
 
 
<p><del><note>In every other or almost every other place where the <unclear>use</unclear> of <unclear>these</unclear> two <unclear>words</unclear> "Trustee" &amp; "Commissioner" <sic>occurrs</sic>, <add>is <gap/> <gap/></add> the other is <unclear>inserted</unclear> also</note></del></p>
<!-- Re the next sentence: I think the intention here is to delete the whole sentence -->
<p><del>If 'Trustee" <unclear>and</unclear> <add></add> <gap/><!-- unsure whether one or two words illegible here --> <add>they are</add> <gap/> <add>Terms not</add>perfectly convertible
<lb/>
<gap/> <gap/> <gap/> is faulty.  If they are
<lb/>
<unclear>use</unclear> of them is <add>in every other clause</add> <unclear>superfluous</unclear>.</del></p>
<p>It is enough to make a person <unclear>stare</unclear> who is not <unclear>perfectly</unclear>
<lb/>
apprized of the identity of the <unclear>two</unclear> <unclear>terms</unclear>, and consequently
<lb/>
of the redundancy <!-- this could be two words and not one ... I'm unsure. --> of one of<unclear> them</unclear><!-- unsure whether this word is crossed out or just dark due to writing in cramped space, possibly the former? --> <!-- symbol added above 'the' (1 in square box) -->  
</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 16:37, 19 November 2021

Click Here To Edit

17 TURNPIKE ACT 7 G3. 40 Observations on 34 § 34

Unsteady
expression

By the to : 344 Every person is to take an to hold that the Oath of
Qualification is to be taken by a man bef before he acts as a Trustee: and if he is
the only to of the Deft is
prosecuted for acting unqualified , the proof is to be that he has acted
as a Commissioner. be the only evidence required
[+]
[+] In every other or
almost every other
place where the use
of these two words
"Trustee" & "Commissioner"
occurrs is , the
other is inserted also

on the part of the Deft.

[][] If "Trustee" & "Commissioner they are Terms not perfectly convertible
Terms , is faulty : if they are
one of them is
in every other clause superfluous.

It is enough to make a person stare who is not perfectly
apprized of the identity of the two terms, & consequently
of the redundancy of one of them [1]

Indeed this is the only
passage in the whole
Act which upon consideration the convertibility of the two terms that make it
perfectly apparent to persons unexperienced in the : who seeing these terms the one alone employd sometimes
that the two terms are absolutely convertible both might be apt to suspect some
The other of these employ'd sometimes
unknown difference in the functions and powers of persons thus differently
denominated



Identifier: | JB/095/057/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 95.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

095

Main Headings

Folio number

057

Info in main headings field

turnpike act 7 g3.40 observations on

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e17 /

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[partial britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

30943

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in