★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<note><!-- Pencil note -->II. Nature of the case<lb/> | <note><!-- Pencil note -->II. Nature of the case<lb/> | ||
3 §.7. VII | 3 §.7. VII Other spoliation impossible</note><lb/> | ||
<p>Let us see then whether to the multitude | <p>Let us see then whether to the multitude judging each for himself,<lb/> | ||
<add>it be possible that</add> any other imaginable plan <add>should afford <del>a prospect of</del> any better promise than the </add> <del>and those remaining two imaginable</del> <note>those which have been brought<lb/> | <add>it be possible that</add> any other imaginable plan <add>should afford <del>a prospect of</del> any better promise than the </add> <del>and those remaining two imaginable</del> <note>those which have been brought<lb/> | ||
to view and disposed of:<lb/> | to view and disposed of:<lb/> | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
the number of the<lb/> | the number of the<lb/> | ||
sharers.</note><lb/> | sharers.</note><lb/> | ||
<add><del>plan but that the effect of which would not be</del></add> In the case where all <add>individuals without exception | <add><del>plan but that the effect of which would not be</del></add> In the case where all <add>individuals without exception are proposed</add> <del>not</del> to be sharer or sharers <del>what</del> <note><!-- Pencil note --><del>3</del>4<lb/> | ||
2<lb/> | 2<lb/> | ||
<gap/> <gap/><lb/> | <gap/> <gap/><lb/> | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
the force of every individual<lb/> | the force of every individual<lb/> | ||
excluded.<lb/> | excluded.<lb/> | ||
The | The fewer the executed<lb/> | ||
the less the saving:<lb/> | the less the saving:<lb/> | ||
the more, the greater <lb/> | the more, the greater <lb/> | ||
the resistance</note><lb/> | the resistance</note><lb/> | ||
to an amount more determinate, conceivable and <add>clearly </add> | to an amount more determinate, conceivable and <add>clearly </add> expressible<lb/> | ||
than any other — we have seen what the <add>bars</add> <del>ab<gap/> | than any other — we have seen what the <add>bars</add> <del>ab<gap/> | ||
</del> are | </del> are that<lb/> | ||
oppose themselves. But to any plan <add>from <del><gap/></del> the | oppose themselves. But to any plan <add>from <del><gap/></del> the <del>by</del> benefit of which,</add> <del>which <gap/> <gap/> any</del><lb/> | ||
<add>individuals of any description should stand excluded: the </add><del>should be included from | <add>individuals of any description should stand excluded: the authors exclusive</add><del>should be included from <unclear>participatory</unclear></del> here <del>could <gap/></del><lb/> | ||
<add>would <del>oppose</del> be opposing an</add> additional obstacle. In any vitro which could be taken<lb/> | <add>would <del>oppose</del> be opposing an</add> additional obstacle. In any vitro which could be taken<lb/> | ||
of the case by any the most sanguine imagination,<del> the</del> the<lb/> | of the case by any the most sanguine imagination,<del> the</del> the<lb/> | ||
obstacles <add>that could not be </add> opposed | obstacles <add>that could not be </add> opposed to the plan. <del>by the opposition that <gap/></del><lb/> | ||
<del>not <gap/> made</del> by <add>all</add> <del>the</del> constituted authorities will<lb/> | <del>not <gap/> made</del> by <add>all</add> <del>the</del> constituted authorities will<lb/> | ||
their adherents, <del>cost</del> could not but present themselves<lb/> | their adherents, <del>cost</del> could not but present themselves<lb/> | ||
as sufficiently formidable. But, on this supposition of a <lb/> | as sufficiently formidable. But, on this supposition of a <lb/> | ||
scheme <del>of <gap/></del> <add><del><gap/></del> narrowed by</add> exclusion, every individual excluded<lb/> | |||
would add to the drea<gap/>ble of | would add to the drea<gap/>ble of the obstacles that oppose themselves<lb/> | ||
of all comprehensive <add>benefit.</add> advantage. <add>Here then comes <del>the</del><add>a</add> dilemma,</add> Let the excluded<lb/> | of all comprehensive <add>benefit.</add> <del>advantage</del>. <add>Here then comes <del>the</del><add>a</add> dilemma,</add> Let the excluded<lb/> | ||
be few, the saving by the exclusion <del>would</del> will be so<lb/> | be few, the saving by the exclusion <del>would</del> will be so<lb/> | ||
much the less. <del><gap/></del> Let <add>the</add> excluded be many, the <del><gap/></del><lb/> | much the less. <del><gap/></del> Let <add>the</add> excluded be many, the <del><gap/></del><lb/> | ||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
1819 Dec. 29
Radicalism not dangerous
II. Nature of the case
3 §.7. VII Other spoliation impossible
Let us see then whether to the multitude judging each for himself,
it be possible that any other imaginable plan should afford a prospect of any better promise than the and those remaining two imaginable those which have been brought
to view and disposed of:
this being at the same time
understood, that there
remains not any other
the effect of which would
not be the affe narrowing
the number of the
sharers.
plan but that the effect of which would not be In the case where all individuals without exception are proposed not to be sharer or sharers what 34
2
would set up in
Of itself, opposition of the
be constituted authorities
would be sufficient
To that would be added
the force of every individual
excluded.
The fewer the executed
the less the saving:
the more, the greater
the resistance
to an amount more determinate, conceivable and clearly expressible
than any other — we have seen what the bars ab
are that
oppose themselves. But to any plan from the by benefit of which, which any
individuals of any description should stand excluded: the authors exclusiveshould be included from participatory here could
would oppose be opposing an additional obstacle. In any vitro which could be taken
of the case by any the most sanguine imagination, the the
obstacles that could not be opposed to the plan. by the opposition that
not made by all the constituted authorities will
their adherents, cost could not but present themselves
as sufficiently formidable. But, on this supposition of a
scheme of narrowed by exclusion, every individual excluded
would add to the dreable of the obstacles that oppose themselves
of all comprehensive benefit. advantage. Here then comes the<add>a dilemma,</add> Let the excluded
be few, the saving by the exclusion would will be so
much the less. Let the excluded be many, the
force of resistance. the reachingresisting in addition added to that of of the
constituted authorities will be so mor much the greater.
Identifier: | JB/137/124/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1819-12-25 |
4 |
||
137 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
124 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
e2 |
||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1816]] |
||
arthur wellesley, duke of wellington |
|||
1816 |
|||
46841 |
|||