JB/159/010/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/159/010/001: Difference between revisions

6d6f (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/010/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/010/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>17</p>
<head>17</head>
<p><head>Punishment distinguished</head><lb/>
<note>Use of distinguishing them.</note>
<note>Use of distinguishing them.</note></p>
<head>Punishment distinguished</head>
<p>This is not a mere affair of words: <del>from</del> <add>to</add> these nominal distinctions<lb/>
<p>This is not a mere affair of words : <del>from</del> to these nominal <del><gap/></del> distinctions correspond some very important ones in point of practise. The use to be made of them is to put <del>enable</del> a man in the way of <del>to</del> taking separate cognisance of them, observing the several <del>objects</del> <hi rend="underline">ends</hi> or <hi rend="underline">purposes</hi> to which the acts productive of these several consequences may be directed, and so taking care that no more pain or <unclear>evil</unclear> shall be produced than what is <del><gap/></del> necessary to the attainment of one or other of such ends or purposes. Such or such a lot of <del><gap/></del> evil, is it necessary for the purpose of ordinary punishment? no. Is it thus necessary for self-preservation on the part of an individual? on the part of the community? on the part of the governing body? For safe-<gap/> Is it a case that calls for the self-preservation, for self-<unclear>discipline</unclear>? for a personal obligation? for a <gap/>? for <add>exacting</add> compensation? for physical restraint? for physical compulsion? If none of all these, then the production of the evil is not justifiable. The synopsis of these objects ought to comprehend all these occasions on which <del><gap/></del> evil is either intentionally or knowingly produced.</p>
<del>run it</del> <add>correspond</add> some very important ones in<lb/> point of practise. The use<hi rend="superscript">†</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">†</hi> This may be referred to Tit. "Punishment an expence":</note>  to be made of them<lb/>
 
is to <del>enable</del> <add>put</add> a man <del>to</del> <add>in the way of</add> taking separate cognisance<lb/>
of them, observing the several <del>objects</del> <hi rend="underline">ends</hi> or <hi rend="underline">purposes</hi><lb/>
to which the acts productive of these several consequences<lb/>
may be directed, and so taking care<lb/>
that no more pain or evil shall be produced<lb/>
than what is <del>put</del> necessary to the attainment<lb/>
of one or other of such ends or purposes. Such<lb/>
or such a lot of <del>pain</del> evil, is it necessary for<lb/>
the purpose of ordinary punishment? no. Is it<lb/>
then necessary for self-preservation <del>?</del> on the part of<lb/>
an individual? on the part of the community?<lb/>
on the part of the governing body? for safe-custody?<lb/>
Is it a case that calls for the self-preservation,<lb/>
for self-defence? for a personal obligation? for a<lb/>
tax? for <add>exacting</add> compensation? for physical restraint?<lb/>
for physical compulsion? If none of all these,<lb/>
then the production of the evil is not justifiable.<lb/>
The synopsis of these objects ought to comprehend<lb/>
all the occasions on which <del>punishment</del> <add>evil</add><lb/>
is either intentionally or knowingly<lb/>
produced.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:03, 24 August 2021

Click Here To Edit

17

Punishment distinguished
Use of distinguishing them.

This is not a mere affair of words: from to these nominal distinctions
run it correspond some very important ones in
point of practise. The use This may be referred to Tit. "Punishment an expence": to be made of them
is to enable put a man to in the way of taking separate cognisance
of them, observing the several objects ends or purposes
to which the acts productive of these several consequences
may be directed, and so taking care
that no more pain or evil shall be produced
than what is put necessary to the attainment
of one or other of such ends or purposes. Such
or such a lot of pain evil, is it necessary for
the purpose of ordinary punishment? no. Is it
then necessary for self-preservation ? on the part of
an individual? on the part of the community?
on the part of the governing body? for safe-custody?
Is it a case that calls for the self-preservation,
for self-defence? for a personal obligation? for a
tax? for exacting compensation? for physical restraint?
for physical compulsion? If none of all these,
then the production of the evil is not justifiable.
The synopsis of these objects ought to comprehend
all the occasions on which punishment evil
is either intentionally or knowingly
produced.


Identifier: | JB/159/010/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 159.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

159

Main Headings

punishment

Folio number

010

Info in main headings field

punishment distinguished

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

[[page_numbering::d17 / f10[3] / f[1]04]]

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

s. lay

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

alexander mavrokordatos

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

53833

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in