JB/015/483/001: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 14:50, 8 October 2021

Supposing always that the good in question cannot be
produced, at any cheaper rate, the following are the justifying
causes by which the production of evil in any shape
and therefore in this shape may be justified -
1. Production of preponderant good to the evil speaker
himself
2. Production of preponderant good to to the person who
is spoken to on spoken of and to whom evil is thus done
3. Preponderant good to any if other person or persons at
large
4. Preponderant good to the public at large.

To the head of preponderant good done for to the public at
large belongs the case where in the production of the uneasiness
the author of it acts on the character of a member of the
tribunal of public opinion, applying the force making application ie. the popular or
moral sanction.

Note here the But a distinction must be drawn between the case where there is
nobody present but the person in whom the uneasiness is caused, and the case where there are of another or others present.
Abstraction made of any particular relation borne by them
be either of the parties, the uneasiness produced will be the greater, the greater the number of the persons so present.

Always keeping therefore in view the
minimization of suffering the if the discount which
benevolence demands will answer the ends of
benevolence by being addressed to the individual
or the absence of all other persons – it should only
be addressed to him in their absence. If the presence
of others be necessary for its intended effect – let
the number present be as few as are needful
for producing that effect.

Identifier: \| JB/015/483/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 15.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	015	Main Headings	deontology
Folio number	483	Info in main headings field	deontology private
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	e3 / f168
Penner		Watermarks	c wilmott 1819
Marginals		Paper Producer	andreas louriottis
Corrections	sir john bowring	Paper Produced in Year	1819
Notes public		ID Number	5699
Box Contents

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 '''[{{fullurl:JB/015/483/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
-<p>
+<p>Supposing always that the good in question cannot be<lb/>
-supposing always that the good in question cannot be<lb/>produced, at any cheaper rate, the following are the justify-<lb/>ing causes by which the production of evil in any shape<lb/> and therefore in this shape may be justified - <lb/>1.Production of preponderant good to the evil speaker<lb/>himself<lb/>2. Production of preponderant good to to the person who<lb/>is spoken to on spoken of and to whom evil is thus done<lb/>3. Preponderant good to any if other person or persons at<lb/>large<lb/>4. Preponderant good to the public at large.</p>  <lb/> To the head of preponderant good <unclear>done for</unclear> to the public at<lb/>large belongs the case where in the production of the <gap/><lb/> the author of it acts on the character of a
+produced, at any cheaper rate, the following are the justifying<lb/>
+causes by which the production of evil in any shape<lb/>
+and therefore in this shape may be justified - <lb/>
+.  Production of preponderant good to the evil speaker<lb/>
+himself<lb/>
+.  Production of preponderant good to to the person who<lb/>
+is spoken to on spoken of and to whom evil is thus done<lb/>
+.  Preponderant good to any if other person or persons at<lb/>
+large<lb/>
+. Preponderant good to the public at large.</p>
+<p>To the head of preponderant good done for to the public at<lb/>
+large belongs the case where in the production of the uneasiness<lb/>
+the <add><del><gap/></del></add> author of it acts on the character of a member of the<lb/>
+tribunal of public opinion, applying the force <add>making application</add> <unclear>ie.</unclear> the popular or<lb/>
+moral sanction.</p>
+<p><del>Note here the</del> <add>But a</add> distinction <add>must be drawn</add> between the case where there is<lb/>
+nobody present but the person in whom the uneasiness is caused,
+and the case where there are <del>of</del> another or others present.<lb/>
+Abstraction made of any particular relation borne by them<lb/>
+be either of the parties, the uneasiness <add>produced</add> will be the greater, the greater the number of the persons <add>so</add> present.</p>
+<p>Always keeping therefore in view the<lb/>
+minimization of suffering <del>the</del> <add>if the</add> discount which<lb/>
+benevolence demands will answer the ends of<lb/>
+benevolence by being addressed to the individual<lb/>
+or the absence of all other persons – it should only<lb/>
+be addressed to him in their absence.  If the presence<lb/>
+of others be necessary for its intended effect – let<lb/>
+the number present be as few as are needful<lb/>
+for <del><gap/></del> <add>producing</add> that effect.</p>
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Views

JB/015/483/001: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 14:50, 8 October 2021

Navigation

Search