JB/015/087/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/015/087/001: Difference between revisions

Eshepherd (talk | contribs)
Beneficence and benevolence
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p>Deontology - Private
<head>Deontology - Private</head>
1. Motives <gap/> by <gap/>: reform <gap/>  
 
2. Occasions - 1. Beneficence <gap/> without <hi rend="underline">any</hi> sacrifice of self-regarding which 2. without any <hi rend="underline">equal</hi> sacrifice
<p>1. Motives suggested by prudence: reference made to <gap/> dictates<lb/>  
3. <gap/>applied to the <gap/>occasion</p>
2. Occasions - 1. Beneficence exercisible without <hi rend="underline">any</hi> sacrifice of self-regarding<lb/>
interest: 2. without any <hi rend="underline">equal</hi> sacrifice
3. dictates applied to the several occasions</p>


<p>Part II</p>
<p>Part II</p>
<p>Beneficence and Benevolence</p>
<p>Beneficence and Benevolence</p>
<p><gap/></p>
<p>Say efficient <gap/></p>
<p>Ch.1</p>
<p>Ch. 1</p>
<p><gap/> of Beneficence and Benevolence with Ref. Prudence</p>
<p>Connection of Beneficence and Benevolence with Self-Prudence</p>


<p>Beneficence is subservient to prudence, self regarding prudence, in 2 cases. 1st. Where it can be exercised without any sacrifice of self regarding interest; to 2 where it can be exercised without any <del></del> sacrifice byt wgar us outweighed by superior <gap/></p>
<p>Beneficence is subservient to prudence, self regarding prudence, in 2 cases. 1<hi rend="superscript">st.</hi> Where it can be<lb/>
exercised without any sacrifice of self regarding<lb/>
interest; to 2 where it can be exercised without<lb/>
any <del></del> sacrifice but what is outweighed by<lb/>  
superior advantage</p>


<p>In both cases, the motives by which beneficence is recommended may be as follows - </p>
<p>In both cases, the motives by which beneficence<lb/>
is recommended may be as follows - </p>


<p>1st motives belonging to the retributive sanctions:chance of reward at the hands of the <gap/> benefitted - of this chance the value will be the greater according as in <unclear>perfec</unclear>t of the power of rewarding the relation of the party <sic>benefitted</sic> to the party <sic>benefitting</sic> is <gap/> of <gap/>, equal or superior.</p>
<p>1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> motives belonging to the retributive sanction:<lb/>
chance of reward at the hands of the person <sic>benefitted</sic><lb/>
of this chance the value will be the greater<lb/>
according as in respect of the power of rewarding<lb/>
the relation of the party <sic>benefitted</sic> to the party<lb/>
<sic>benefitting</sic> is that of inferior, equal, or superior.</p>


<p>In this respect no human being is to such a <gap/>inferior as that the chance of receiving at his hands remunerative retribution should be equal to 0.</p>
<p>In this respect no human being is to<lb/>  
such a degree inferior as that the chance of<lb/>
receiving at his hands remunerative retribution<lb/>
should be equal to 0.</p>


<p>Illustrative of this position is the well known fable of the lion and the <unclear>noble</unclear></p>
<p>Illustrative of this position is the well<lb/>
known fable of the lion and the mouse</p>


<p>"<hi rend="superscript">nd</hi> motives belonging to the moral or popular sanction</p>
<p>2<hi rend="superscript">nd</hi> motives belonging to the moral or popular<lb/>
sanction</p>


<p>This supposes the fact and circumstances of the benefit known. The value of the reward will in this case be the ratio of 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> the degree of supposed mentioned; <gap/>belonging to the exercise of the virtue in the case in question; 2<hi rend="superscript">nd</hi> the number and <sic>influentiability</sic> of the persons to whom in the characters of judges of the judicatory of the popular sanctions the knowledge of the fact here <gap/></p>
<p>This supposes the fact and circumstances of the<lb/>
benefit known. The value of the reward will<lb/>
in this case be the ratio of 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi><lb/>
the degree of supposed mentioned; viz. belonging<lb/>  
to the exercise of the virtue in the case<lb/>
in question; 2<hi rend="superscript">nd</hi> the number and <sic>influentiability</sic><lb/>
of the persons to whom in the character of<lb/>
judges of the judicatory of the popular sanction<lb/>
the knowledge of the fact has <gap/></p>


<p>For illustration may be employed the story of the <sic>preconivation</sic> of the miraculous power of Jesus by the sick and infirm who had been healed by him</p>
<p>For illustration may be employed<lb/>
the story of the <sic>preconivation</sic> of the miraculous<lb/>
power of Jesus by the sick and infirm who<lb/>
had been healed by him</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 15:55, 27 April 2020

Click Here To Edit

Deontology - Private

1. Motives suggested by prudence: reference made to dictates
2. Occasions - 1. Beneficence exercisible without any sacrifice of self-regarding
interest: 2. without any equal sacrifice 3. dictates applied to the several occasions

Part II

Beneficence and Benevolence

Say efficient

Ch. 1

Connection of Beneficence and Benevolence with Self-Prudence

Beneficence is subservient to prudence, self regarding prudence, in 2 cases. 1st. Where it can be
exercised without any sacrifice of self regarding
interest; to 2 where it can be exercised without
any sacrifice but what is outweighed by
superior advantage

In both cases, the motives by which beneficence
is recommended may be as follows -

1st motives belonging to the retributive sanction:
chance of reward at the hands of the person benefitted
of this chance the value will be the greater
according as in respect of the power of rewarding
the relation of the party benefitted to the party
benefitting is that of inferior, equal, or superior.

In this respect no human being is to
such a degree inferior as that the chance of
receiving at his hands remunerative retribution
should be equal to 0.

Illustrative of this position is the well
known fable of the lion and the mouse

2nd motives belonging to the moral or popular
sanction

This supposes the fact and circumstances of the
benefit known. The value of the reward will
in this case be the ratio of 1st
the degree of supposed mentioned; viz. belonging
to the exercise of the virtue in the case
in question; 2nd the number and influentiability
of the persons to whom in the character of
judges of the judicatory of the popular sanction
the knowledge of the fact has

For illustration may be employed
the story of the preconivation of the miraculous
power of Jesus by the sick and infirm who
had been healed by him



Identifier: | JB/015/087/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 15.

Date_1

1819-04

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

015

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

087

Info in main headings field

deontology private

Image

001

Titles

part ii / beneficence and benevolence / ch. 1 / connection of beneficence and benevolence with prudence

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e1

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

5303

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in