★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Imputation of motive |
No edit summary |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p><del>In</del> The imputation of motive is one of the most dangerous weapons<lb/>with which to attack an adversary and one of the most <gap/><lb/>grounds for | <p><del>In</del> The imputation of motive is one of the most dangerous weapons<lb/>with which to attack an adversary and one of the most <gap/><lb/>grounds for judgement - since motives can be known when <del><gap/></del> <add>alone</add> where<lb/><del><gap/><gap/></del> <add>conduct is in question</add>—& can only be guessed at by other persons. By<lb/>This distinction on the part of the impugner or the approver of<lb/><del>conduct</del><add>an act </add> to esteem it praiseworthy or blameworthy not according to its<lb/>results but to the unknowable intention of the <gap/> <add>may<del>will</del>destiny<del>at least</del></add> all the <del><gap/></del><lb/><add>imputation <gap/> </add>of virtuous conduct <del>may be farther away</del> by the insinuation that <lb/>the motives were bad,—of all the <sic>desreputableness</sic> of punishment<lb/> of vicious conduct by the setting forth the goodness of the motives that <lb/>led to it. But on the other hand, it should not be forgotten that <gap/><lb/>unfounded imputation is not <foreign>mala fide</foreign> invented by him who first <lb/> casts it. A measure is deemed to be wrong where it is opposed <lb/> to the <sic>intercut</sic> of another-and if wrong in the eye of that office, it<lb/> is but natural that he should attribute it to a wrong motive.<lb/> Hence to avoid the attributing motives to others, & to avoid <add>rude or</add> hasty<lb/><del> & uncandid</del> condemnation of those who <hi rend="underline">do</hi> attribute motives <lb/>to others are alike the dictates of uncertainty</p> | ||
<p>Then again &c</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
In The imputation of motive is one of the most dangerous weapons
with which to attack an adversary and one of the most
grounds for judgement - since motives can be known when alone where
conduct is in question—& can only be guessed at by other persons. By
This distinction on the part of the impugner or the approver of
conductan act to esteem it praiseworthy or blameworthy not according to its
results but to the unknowable intention of the maywilldestinyat least all the
imputation of virtuous conduct may be farther away by the insinuation that
the motives were bad,—of all the desreputableness of punishment
of vicious conduct by the setting forth the goodness of the motives that
led to it. But on the other hand, it should not be forgotten that
unfounded imputation is not mala fide invented by him who first
casts it. A measure is deemed to be wrong where it is opposed
to the intercut of another-and if wrong in the eye of that office, it
is but natural that he should attribute it to a wrong motive.
Hence to avoid the attributing motives to others, & to avoid rude or hasty
& uncandid condemnation of those who do attribute motives
to others are alike the dictates of uncertainty
Then again &c
Identifier: | JB/015/359/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 15. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
015 |
deontology |
||
359 |
|||
001 |
|||
linking material |
1 |
||
recto |
f34+ |
||
sir john bowring |
[[watermarks::[top of motif]]] |
||
5575 |
|||