JB/015/359/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/015/359/001: Difference between revisions

Eshepherd (talk | contribs)
Imputation of motive
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p><del>In</del> The imputation of motive is one of the most dangerous weapons<lb/>with which to attack an adversary and one of the most <gap/><lb/>grounds for <gap/> - since motives can be known when <del><gap/></del> <add>alone</add> where<lb/><del><gap/><gap/></del> <add>conduct is in question</add>&#x2014;&amp;can only be <gap/> of by other persons.<gap/><lb/>This </gap> on the part of the <gap/> or the approver of<lb/><del>conduct</del><add>an act </add> to extreme is <gap/> or <gap/> and according to its<lb/><gap/> but to the unknowable intention of the <gap/> <add>may<del>will</del>destiny<del>at least</del></add> all the <del><gap/></del><lb/><add>imputation <gap/> of virtuous conduct <del>may be farther away</del> by the <gap/> that <lb/>the motives were bad-of all the <sic>desreputableness</sic> of <gap/> of vicious conduct</p>
<p><del>In</del> The imputation of motive is one of the most dangerous weapons<lb/>with which to attack an adversary and one of the most <gap/><lb/>grounds for judgement - since motives can be known when <del><gap/></del> <add>alone</add> where<lb/><del><gap/><gap/></del> <add>conduct is in question</add>&#x2014;&amp; can only be guessed at by other persons. By<lb/>This distinction on the part of the impugner or the approver of<lb/><del>conduct</del><add>an act </add> to esteem it praiseworthy or blameworthy not according to its<lb/>results but to the unknowable intention of the <gap/> <add>may<del>will</del>destiny<del>at least</del></add> all the <del><gap/></del><lb/><add>imputation <gap/> </add>of virtuous conduct <del>may be farther away</del> by the insinuation that <lb/>the motives were bad,&#x2014;of all the <sic>desreputableness</sic> of punishment<lb/> of vicious conduct by the setting forth the goodness of the motives that <lb/>led to it. But on the other hand, it should not be forgotten that <gap/><lb/>unfounded imputation is not <foreign>mala fide</foreign> invented by him who first <lb/> casts it. A measure is deemed to be wrong where it is opposed <lb/> to the <sic>intercut</sic> of another-and if wrong in the eye of that office, it<lb/> is but natural that he should attribute it to a wrong motive.<lb/> Hence to avoid the attributing motives to others, &amp; to avoid <add>rude or</add> hasty<lb/><del> &amp; uncandid</del> condemnation of those who <hi rend="underline">do</hi> attribute motives <lb/>to others are alike the dictates of uncertainty</p>
 
<p>Then again &amp;c</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 12:10, 20 July 2020

Click Here To Edit

In The imputation of motive is one of the most dangerous weapons
with which to attack an adversary and one of the most
grounds for judgement - since motives can be known when alone where
conduct is in question—& can only be guessed at by other persons. By
This distinction on the part of the impugner or the approver of
conductan act to esteem it praiseworthy or blameworthy not according to its
results but to the unknowable intention of the maywilldestinyat least all the
imputation of virtuous conduct may be farther away by the insinuation that
the motives were bad,—of all the desreputableness of punishment
of vicious conduct by the setting forth the goodness of the motives that
led to it. But on the other hand, it should not be forgotten that
unfounded imputation is not mala fide invented by him who first
casts it. A measure is deemed to be wrong where it is opposed
to the intercut of another-and if wrong in the eye of that office, it
is but natural that he should attribute it to a wrong motive.
Hence to avoid the attributing motives to others, & to avoid rude or hasty
& uncandid condemnation of those who do attribute motives
to others are alike the dictates of uncertainty

Then again &c



Identifier: | JB/015/359/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 15.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

015

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

359

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

linking material

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f34+

Penner

sir john bowring

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[top of motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

5575

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in