JB/159/012/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/159/012/001: Difference between revisions

Klander (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Klander (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Punishments distinguished and defined
<head>Punishments distinguished and defined.</head><lb/>
Punishment Restraint Warburton.  Importance of the above distinctions
<head>Punishment Restraint Warburton.  Importance of the above distinctions</head><lb/>
"such dist? of precese moral words", says Bishop Warburton,
<p>"Such <gap/><del></add> <gap/> of precese moral</add> words", says Bishop Warburton,<lb/>
speaking of punishment and restraint, "would would
speaking of punishment and restraint, "one would<lb/>
"think it was not very easy to comprehend." + With ?
"think it was not <add></add>very<add></add> easy to comprehend." <note> Allsance B.III. Ch. 3. p.303 edit <gap/></note> With  
? to that acute and able reasoner to whose instructions
<gap/>to that acute <add></add>and able <add></add>reasoner to whose instructions<lb/>
I find myself ? ? I cannot altogether of this opinion
<del>of a different opinion.</del> <gap/>To be the <gap/><add></add>I find myself <gap/><gap/><gap/>, <del>this I do not take</del> <add></add>I cannot <gap/><gap/>altogether of this opinion<lb/>
? my own part I know that with
For my own part I know that with<lb/>
the ?fist ? I to distingwish ? I felt my-
<gap/><lb/>
-self ? danger of confounding them wery ?
the <gap/><gap/> to distingwish <gap/> I <add>have<add></add></add>felt myself<lb/>
This I do not attrubute solely to my own weak-
<gap/> danger of confounding them wery <gap/><lb/>
-ness and that for this reason ? them, that  
This I do not attrubute solely to my own weakness,<lb/> <add></add>and that<add></add> for this <add></add>reason<add></add> amongst them, <hi rend="underline">reasons</hi>,that <del>the <gap/></del><add>his Lordship</add><lb/>
, ? himself ? to ? not to have stated the
himself appears to the not to have stated the<lb/>
question so churly ? as could have been wishid.{{In_Progress}}
question <del>very</del><add></add> so <add></add>churly, as could have been wishid.<lb/></p>
If <del>punishment and <gap/></del> <gap/> <unclear>restraint</unclear><lb/>
were "<unclear>speeres</unclear> of any thing of which punishment<lb/>
also is a <unclear>speeres</unclear>, I will not say that was in<lb/>
this case it would not be easy to confound them:<lb/>
but however it might be not very difficult<lb/>
perhaps, upon occasion to <del><gap/></del>><add>distinguish them.</add> The<lb/>
<gap/> would be first to refer them to this<lb/>
nearest common <hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi>, and then to assign their<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">difference</hi>. But this unfortunately is not the<lb/>
case.  Punishment in the sense of it is <hi rend="underline">pain</hi>:<lb/>
pain is a sensation: a sensation is of the <del><gap/></del>class<lb/>
of real entities. Punishment in another sense of<lb/>
it is an act: an act is again in the number<lb/>
of real entities.  But restraint stands not in any sense in whooh it is ever used<lb/>
in <add>either of these classes is nor in</add> any class of real entities.  In neither of these two senses{{In_Progress}}

Latest revision as of 11:39, 13 April 2020

Punishments distinguished and defined.
Punishment Restraint Warburton. Importance of the above distinctions

"Such </add> of precese moral</add> words", says Bishop Warburton,
speaking of punishment and restraint, "one would
"think it was not very easy to comprehend." Allsance B.III. Ch. 3. p.303 edit With to that acute and able reasoner to whose instructions
of a different opinion.
To be the I find myself , this I do not take I cannot altogether of this opinion
For my own part I know that with

the to distingwish I have<add></add>felt myself
danger of confounding them wery
This I do not attrubute solely to my own weakness,
and that for this reason amongst them, reasons,that the his Lordship
himself appears to the not to have stated the
question very so churly, as could have been wishid.

If punishment and restraint
were "speeres of any thing of which punishment
also is a speeres, I will not say that was in
this case it would not be easy to confound them:
but however it might be not very difficult
perhaps, upon occasion to >distinguish them. The
would be first to refer them to this
nearest common , and then to assign their
difference. But this unfortunately is not the
case. Punishment in the sense of it is pain:
pain is a sensation: a sensation is of the class
of real entities. Punishment in another sense of
it is an act: an act is again in the number
of real entities. But restraint stands not in any sense in whooh it is ever used
in either of these classes is nor in any class of real entities. In neither of these two senses

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in