JB/137/354/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/137/354/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/137/354/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


<!-- part of heading and marginal notes in pencil -->
<!-- part of heading and marginal notes in pencil -->
<head>1820 <sic>Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi></sic> 26<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <p>&sect; 10<lb/><note>III Experience<lb/>II Ireland<lb/>Sheffield against Reform</note></p> <p>"It seems reasonable to suppose" (continues the Noble Lord p 355)<lb/>"that which the election is in the hands of men of property and<lb/>"consideration, the elected will fulfil the purpose of legislation<lb/."better than those <gap/> by the multitude, which has neither property<lb/>"nor judgment."</p> <p>However reasonable it may have seemed to the Noble Lord,<lb/>the <gap/> has been notoriously and but too extensively otherwise <add>opposite</add></p> <p> <sic>A<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> 1773 per Hardy p <!-- blank space --> <gap/> National debt of Ireland.<lb/>£9..,.... pension list £1..,... National debt 1819.<lb/>£..,.... The property of the country would be safe in the<lb/>hands of the multitude: it now <del>can be safe</del> <add>which has matter property <gap/> judgment</add> has been safe, it<lb/>never can be safe in the hands of those men of property <gap/><lb/>consideration in whose hands it has always been, and <sic>till</sic> it<lb/>is completely destroyed, must, unless it be taken into the hands<lb/>of that same multitude <del>was<d/el> ever be.  The reason <del>has one<lb/> now</del> if it was not so before has been <gap/> <gap/> enough to<lb/>every eye that can endure to look at it.  The multitude could<lb/>not take the property of the men of property and consideration<lb/> <Add>and divide it among themselves</add> without destroying <del>themselves and</del> one another and themselves<lb/>The men of property and consideration can <add>and do</add> take from the<lb/>multitude a very large proportion of their property, and<lb/>divide it among themselves, on condition of taking <add>from them</add> a much<lb/>larger proportion of their property and wasting it in an<lb/>infinite variety of ways, and in particular in employing<lb/>it in luring <del>men</del> their countrymen to murder and plunder<lb/>An inhabitant <add>subject</add> of other states by hundreds of thousands<lb/>on pretence of <del><gap/></del> honour and glory, and acquiring foreign<lb/>dependencies all <add>by way in</add> which without exception <del><gap/></del> taxes instead of<lb/>being diminished an <gap/> in acquiring these dependencies<lb/>for the sake of the <sic>plunderings</sic> to be obtained from them at their<lb/><add>expense</add><lb/><!-- continues in margin -->expense or that of the<lb/>mother country in both<lb/>in the shape of inducements<lb/>of Office</p>   
<head>1820 <sic>Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi></sic> 26<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <p>&sect; 10<lb/><note>III Experience<lb/>II Ireland<lb/>Sheffield against Reform</note></p> <p>"It seems reasonable to suppose" (continues the Noble Lord p 355)<lb/>"that while the election is in the hands of men of property and<lb/>"consideration, the elected will fulfil the purpose of legislation<lb/>"better than those sent by the multitude, which has neither property<lb/>"nor judgment."</p> <p>However reasonable it may have seemed to the Noble Lord,<lb/>the <unclear>event</unclear> has been notoriously and but too extensively otherwise <add>opposite</add></p> <p> <sic>A<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> 1773 per Hardy p <!-- blank space --> <gap/> National debt of Ireland.<lb/>£9..,.... pension list £1..,... National debt 1819.<lb/>£..,.... The property of the country would be safe in the<lb/>hands of the multitude: <add>which has neither property nor judgment</add> it never <del>can be safe</del> has been safe, it<lb/>never can be safe in the hands of those men of property and<lb/>consideration in whose hands it has always been, and <sic>till</sic> it<lb/>is completely destroyed, must, unless it be taken into the hands<lb/>of that same multitude <del>was</del> ever be.  The reason <del>here <gap/><lb/>now</del> if it was not so before has been evident plain enough to<lb/>every eye that can endure to look at it.  The multitude could<lb/>not take the property of the men of property and consideration<lb/> <Add>and divide it among themselves</add> without destroying <del>themselves and</del> one another and themselves<lb/>The men of property and consideration can <add>and do</add> take from the<lb/>multitude a very large proportion of their property, and<lb/>divide it among themselves, on condition of taking <add>from them</add> a much<lb/>larger proportion of their property and wasting it in an<lb/>infinite variety of ways, and in particular in employing<lb/>it in luring <del>men</del> their countrymen to murder and plunder<lb/>An inhabitant <add>subject</add> of other states by hundreds of thousands<lb/>on pretence of <del><gap/></del> honour and glory, and acquiring foreign<lb/>dependencies all <add>by way in</add> which without exception <del><gap/></del> taxes instead of<lb/>being diminished are <sic>increased</sic>: in acquiring these dependencies<lb/>for the sake of the <sic>plunderings</sic> to be obtained from them at their<lb/><add>expense</add><lb/><!-- continues in margin -->expense or that of the<lb/>mother country or both<lb/>in the shape of inducements<lb/>of office</p>   






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 13:33, 7 August 2020

Click Here To Edit

1820 Jany 26
Radicalism not dangerous

§ 10
III Experience
II Ireland
Sheffield against Reform

"It seems reasonable to suppose" (continues the Noble Lord p 355)
"that while the election is in the hands of men of property and
"consideration, the elected will fulfil the purpose of legislation
"better than those sent by the multitude, which has neither property
"nor judgment."

However reasonable it may have seemed to the Noble Lord,
the event has been notoriously and but too extensively otherwise opposite

Ao 1773 per Hardy p National debt of Ireland.
£9..,.... pension list £1..,... National debt 1819.
£..,.... The property of the country would be safe in the
hands of the multitude: which has neither property nor judgment it never can be safe has been safe, it
never can be safe in the hands of those men of property and
consideration in whose hands it has always been, and till it
is completely destroyed, must, unless it be taken into the hands
of that same multitude was ever be. The reason here
now
if it was not so before has been evident plain enough to
every eye that can endure to look at it. The multitude could
not take the property of the men of property and consideration
and divide it among themselves without destroying themselves and one another and themselves
The men of property and consideration can and do take from the
multitude a very large proportion of their property, and
divide it among themselves, on condition of taking from them a much
larger proportion of their property and wasting it in an
infinite variety of ways, and in particular in employing
it in luring men their countrymen to murder and plunder
An inhabitant subject of other states by hundreds of thousands
on pretence of honour and glory, and acquiring foreign
dependencies all by way in which without exception taxes instead of
being diminished are increased: in acquiring these dependencies
for the sake of the plunderings to be obtained from them at their
expense
expense or that of the
mother country or both
in the shape of inducements
of office




Identifier: | JB/137/354/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1820-01-26

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

354

Info in main headings field

radicalism not dangerous

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1816]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur wellesley, duke of wellington

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1816

Notes public

ID Number

47071

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in