★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1820 <sic>Jan</sic> 19<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <!-- marginal notes in pencil --> <p><note>III Experience<lb/>II Ireland</note><lb/> (7) <note>Sheffield against Reform</note></p> <p>But this theory of his Lordships. <add>concerning what ought to be</add> let it not be said that it<lb/>risks hanging in the air: it has its basis in <del>another</del> matters<lb/>theory concerning <add>as to</add> matters of fact: <del>the</del> <add>understand</add> always his Lordships<lb/>imagination concerning what would be <del>fact</del> matter of fact: <del>to<lb/><gap/></del> that being in imagination certain what in nature is<lb/>impossible. For here we are introduced to our old acquaintance<lb/>the "subversion of the rights of property". in the <unclear>throne</unclear> <add>Prince Regent's</add> language<lb/> the "subversion of the rights of property" in his Lordships<lb/>language "no Agrarian law, or any levelling principle <note> p. 368</note><lb/>whatever. "The author" says <add>continues</add> his lordship . . . . <!-- brackets in pencil --> [thinks it<lb/>sufficient at present to <unclear>muse</unclear> about things as they are, <lb/>and] will content himself with observing that the argument<lb/>or sentiment equally goes to an Agrarian law, or any<lb/>principle whatever: it establishes confusion, in the place<lb/>"of order". No my good Lord: begging your Lordships pardon,<lb/>it goes to no such thing: it goes to the preservation of property<lb/>not to the destination of it. It goes to the preservation of property<lb/>use as property is preserved in the United States: <add>it goes</add> to the<lb/>preservation of property not only against depredation upon a<lb/>small scale as in <add>against</add> the case of pickpockets, highwaymen<lb/>and housebreakers, but against depredation upon the largest<lb/>scale, as against some small holders of useless places needless places<lb/> | <head>1820 <sic>Jan</sic> 19<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <!-- marginal notes in pencil --> <p><note>III Experience<lb/>II Ireland</note><lb/> (7) <note>Sheffield against Reform</note></p> <p>But this theory of his Lordships. <add>concerning what ought to be</add> let it not be said that it<lb/>risks hanging in the air: it has its basis in <del>another</del> matters<lb/>theory concerning <add>as to</add> matters of fact: <del>the</del> <add>understand</add> always his Lordships<lb/>imagination concerning what would be <del>fact</del> matter of fact: <del>to<lb/><gap/></del> that being in imagination certain what in nature is<lb/>impossible. For here we are introduced to our old acquaintance<lb/>the "subversion of the rights of property". in the <unclear>throne</unclear> <add>Prince Regent's</add> language<lb/> the "subversion of the rights of property" in his Lordships<lb/>language "no Agrarian law, or any levelling principle <note> p. 368</note><lb/>whatever. "The author" says <add>continues</add> his lordship . . . . <!-- brackets in pencil --> [thinks it<lb/>sufficient at present to <unclear>muse</unclear> about things as they are, <lb/>and] will content himself with observing that the argument<lb/>or sentiment equally goes to an Agrarian law, or any<lb/>principle whatever: it establishes confusion, in the place<lb/>"of order". No my good Lord: begging your Lordships pardon,<lb/>it goes to no such thing: it goes to the preservation of property<lb/>not to the destination of it. It goes to the preservation of property<lb/>use as property is preserved in the United States: <add>it goes</add> to the<lb/>preservation of property not only against depredation upon a<lb/>small scale as in <add>against</add> the case of pickpockets, highwaymen<lb/>and housebreakers, but against depredation upon the largest<lb/>scale, as against some small holders of useless places needless places<lb/>overpaid places, and makers of <unclear>wine</unclear> and conquerors of distant<lb/>dependencies for the sake of <sic>honor</sic> and glory power and glory<lb/> might majesty and dominion; and <add>including</add> the patronage <add>and possessors in patronage</add> of these<lb/>same however useless places needless places and overpaid <note>since it <gap/></note><lb/>places and establishers of standing armies for fixing the people<lb/>to exist while it exhorted for them to <unclear>conspire</unclear> the <unclear>enrolment</unclear> of them</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1820 Jan 19
Radicalism not dangerous
III Experience
II Ireland
(7) Sheffield against Reform
But this theory of his Lordships. concerning what ought to be let it not be said that it
risks hanging in the air: it has its basis in another matters
theory concerning as to matters of fact: the understand always his Lordships
imagination concerning what would be fact matter of fact: to
that being in imagination certain what in nature is
impossible. For here we are introduced to our old acquaintance
the "subversion of the rights of property". in the throne Prince Regent's language
the "subversion of the rights of property" in his Lordships
language "no Agrarian law, or any levelling principle p. 368
whatever. "The author" says continues his lordship . . . . [thinks it
sufficient at present to muse about things as they are,
and] will content himself with observing that the argument
or sentiment equally goes to an Agrarian law, or any
principle whatever: it establishes confusion, in the place
"of order". No my good Lord: begging your Lordships pardon,
it goes to no such thing: it goes to the preservation of property
not to the destination of it. It goes to the preservation of property
use as property is preserved in the United States: it goes to the
preservation of property not only against depredation upon a
small scale as in against the case of pickpockets, highwaymen
and housebreakers, but against depredation upon the largest
scale, as against some small holders of useless places needless places
overpaid places, and makers of wine and conquerors of distant
dependencies for the sake of honor and glory power and glory
might majesty and dominion; and including the patronage and possessors in patronage of these
same however useless places needless places and overpaid since it
places and establishers of standing armies for fixing the people
to exist while it exhorted for them to conspire the enrolment of them
|
Identifier: | JB/137/362/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1820-01-19 |
|||
|
137 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
|
362 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c7 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
47079 |
|||
