★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1819 <sic>Nov.</sic> 30<lb/>Radicalism not</head> <!-- all marginal notes in pencil --> <p><note>II Experience</note><lb/>6 <note>II Ireland</note></p> <p> Plowdens History of Ireland II 455 from <add>the Irish</add> Parliamentary debates<lb/>p.80 Appendix <sic>Vol</sic> 44, <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> XCVII</p> <p><note>13 or 5<lb/>On the <!-- blank space --> <gap/> of <!-- blank space --> <gap/> 1783<lb/>Grattan spoke against<lb/>that instrument then<lb/>in full operation of<lb/>every thing excellent<lb/>in government a set<lb/>speech: as per Plowden<lb/> III.97. from Irish<lb/><sic>Parl.</sic> Debates. <sic>Vol</sic> 44<lb/>p.80.</note></p> <p>On the <!-- blank space --> <gap/> of <!-- blank space --> <gap/> 1783 it was that <del>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> G</del> in<lb/>the Irish House of Commons stood up and delivered, against<lb/>that undisputed and universally known instrument of<lb/>every thing that was most excellent in government and<lb/>morality, that instrument being at the very time in full<lb/>operation, <del>the followi <add>a <gap/></add></del> a set-speech of <add>from</add> which the following<lb/>are extracts. It is printed by M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Plowden in the<lb/>Appendix to his History of Ireland <sic>Vol.</sic> III <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> XCVII<lb/><del><gap/></del> By somebody it should seem something on behalf of<lb/>radicalism had been advanced for <add>this part of</add> M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Grattans speech<lb/>begins as follows</p> <p><note>14 or 6<lb/>'Personal or individual<lb/>representation (says he)<lb/>is worse than the abuses<lb/>"so defended"<lb/>means by him of<lb/>course D of Richmond's<lb/>plan</note></p> <p>"Worse than the abuses so defended is a plan I have<lb/>"seen for their information — personal or individual representation."<lb/> It was probably the Duke of Richmond's plan<lb/>which had for some time been in circulation there as<lb/>well as here</p> <p><note>15 or 7<lb/>His <hi rend="underline">arguments</hi> belong<lb/>not to this place.<lb/>Per <hi rend="underline">conclusion</hi>,<lb/>"The revolution of power<lb/>would speedily lead<lb/>to a revolution of<lb/>property "plunder"<lb/>"confusion",, robbery<lb/>"murder".</note></p> <p>He then proceeds to combat it by a train of argument<lb/>which belong not to this plan: What belongs to the plan, is<lb/>the conclusion which is in the words following.</p> <p>"Such would be the state of election under this plan<lb/>"of personal representation, which from <del>a</del> revolution of<lb/>"power would speedily lead to a revolution of property, and<lb/>"become a plan of plunder as well as a scene of confusion;<lb/>"for if you transfer the power of the state to<lb/>"those who have nothing in the Country, they will afterwards<lb/>"transfer the property, and annex it once more to<lb/>"the power in their own persons; give them your power<lb/>"and they will give themselves your property; of such<lb/>"a representation as this plan would provide, the first<lb/>"ordinance would be robbery — accompanied with the<lb/>"circumstance incidental to robbery — murder." | <head>1819 <sic>Nov.</sic> 30<lb/>Radicalism not</head> <!-- all marginal notes in pencil --> <p><note>II Experience</note><lb/>6 <note>II Ireland</note></p> <p> Plowdens History of Ireland II 455 from <add>the Irish</add> Parliamentary debates<lb/>p.80 Appendix <sic>Vol</sic> 44, <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> XCVII</p> <p><note>13 or 5<lb/>On the <!-- blank space --> <gap/> of <!-- blank space --> <gap/> 1783<lb/>Grattan spoke against<lb/>that instrument then<lb/>in full operation of<lb/>every thing excellent<lb/>in government a set<lb/>speech: as per Plowden<lb/> III.97. from Irish<lb/><sic>Parl.</sic> Debates. <sic>Vol</sic> 44<lb/>p.80.</note></p> <p>On the <!-- blank space --> <gap/> of <!-- blank space --> <gap/> 1783 it was that <del>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> G</del> in<lb/>the Irish House of Commons stood up and delivered, against<lb/>that undisputed and universally known instrument of<lb/>every thing that was most excellent in government and<lb/>morality, that instrument being at the very time in full<lb/>operation, <del>the followi <add>a <gap/></add></del> a set-speech of <add>from</add> which the following<lb/>are extracts. It is printed by M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Plowden in the<lb/>Appendix to his History of Ireland <sic>Vol.</sic> III <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> XCVII<lb/><del><gap/></del> By somebody it should seem something on behalf of<lb/>radicalism had been advanced for <add>this part of</add> M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Grattans speech<lb/>begins as follows</p> <p><note>14 or 6<lb/>'Personal or individual<lb/>representation (says he)<lb/>is worse than the abuses<lb/>"so defended"<lb/>means by him of<lb/>course D of Richmond's<lb/>plan</note></p> <p>"Worse than the abuses so defended is a plan I have<lb/>"seen for their information — personal or individual representation."<lb/> It was probably the Duke of Richmond's plan<lb/>which had for some time been in circulation there as<lb/>well as here</p> <p><note>15 or 7<lb/>His <hi rend="underline">arguments</hi> belong<lb/>not to this place.<lb/>Per <hi rend="underline">conclusion</hi>,<lb/>"The revolution of power<lb/>would speedily lead<lb/>to a revolution of<lb/>property "plunder"<lb/>"confusion",, robbery<lb/>"murder".</note></p> <p>He then proceeds to combat it by a train of argument<lb/>which belong not to this plan: What belongs to the plan, is<lb/>the conclusion which is in the words following.</p> <p>"Such would be the state of election under this plan<lb/>"of personal representation, which from <del>a</del> revolution of<lb/>"power would speedily lead to a revolution of property, and<lb/>"become a plan of plunder as well as a scene of confusion;<lb/>"for if you transfer the power of the state to<lb/>"those who have nothing in the Country, they will afterwards<lb/>"transfer the property, and annex it once more to<lb/>"the power in their own persons; give them your power<lb/>"and they will give themselves your property; of such<lb/>"a representation as this plan would provide, the first<lb/>"ordinance would be robbery — accompanied with the<lb/>"circumstance incidental to robbery — murder."</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1819 Nov. 30
Radicalism not
II Experience
6 II Ireland
Plowdens History of Ireland II 455 from the Irish Parliamentary debates
p.80 Appendix Vol 44, No XCVII
13 or 5
On the of 1783
Grattan spoke against
that instrument then
in full operation of
every thing excellent
in government a set
speech: as per Plowden
III.97. from Irish
Parl. Debates. Vol 44
p.80.
On the of 1783 it was that Mr G in
the Irish House of Commons stood up and delivered, against
that undisputed and universally known instrument of
every thing that was most excellent in government and
morality, that instrument being at the very time in full
operation, the followi a a set-speech of from which the following
are extracts. It is printed by Mr Plowden in the
Appendix to his History of Ireland Vol. III No XCVII
By somebody it should seem something on behalf of
radicalism had been advanced for this part of Mr Grattans speech
begins as follows
14 or 6
'Personal or individual
representation (says he)
is worse than the abuses
"so defended"
means by him of
course D of Richmond's
plan
"Worse than the abuses so defended is a plan I have
"seen for their information — personal or individual representation."
It was probably the Duke of Richmond's plan
which had for some time been in circulation there as
well as here
15 or 7
His arguments belong
not to this place.
Per conclusion,
"The revolution of power
would speedily lead
to a revolution of
property "plunder"
"confusion",, robbery
"murder".
He then proceeds to combat it by a train of argument
which belong not to this plan: What belongs to the plan, is
the conclusion which is in the words following.
"Such would be the state of election under this plan
"of personal representation, which from a revolution of
"power would speedily lead to a revolution of property, and
"become a plan of plunder as well as a scene of confusion;
"for if you transfer the power of the state to
"those who have nothing in the Country, they will afterwards
"transfer the property, and annex it once more to
"the power in their own persons; give them your power
"and they will give themselves your property; of such
"a representation as this plan would provide, the first
"ordinance would be robbery — accompanied with the
"circumstance incidental to robbery — murder."
|
Identifier: | JB/137/398/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1819-11-30 |
13 or 5 - 15 or 7 |
||
|
137 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
|
398 |
radicalism not |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e6 |
||
|
jeremy bentham; john flowerdew colls |
[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1818]] |
||
|
arthur wellesley, duke of wellington |
|||
|
1818 |
|||
|
47115 |
|||
