JB/050/097/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/050/097/001: Difference between revisions

Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:




under construction ...


 
<head>CERTAINTY.  <add>APPEAL ++ <note>++<!-- rotate '++' 90 degrees (in both the addition and note), till vertical -->  v. Fine to the Party - under PUNISHMENT this is continued from that Leaf.</note> Pardon.</add></head>
<p>it is not so much as pretended , that the abuses
<p>It is not so much as pretended, that the abuses
<lb/>
<lb/>
of this Prerogative are frequent : let in <unclear>see</unclear> <gap/> ,
of this Prerogative are frequent: let us see for a moment,
<lb/>
<lb/>
what we should gain by <add>the revival of</add> this imagined
what we should gain by <add>the revival of</add> this imagined
Line 18: Line 17:
body undertake that it shall be applied always
body undertake that it shall be applied always
<lb/>
<lb/>
to the one case Where there is abuse , &amp; never to
to the one case Where there is abuse, &amp; never to
<lb/>
any of the hundred were there is none <add>utility</add>?  <del><gap/></del>  I believe
<lb/>
not.  I conceive therefore, that there would be a
<lb/>
<lb/>
any of the hundred were there is none <unclear>utility</unclear><del><gap/></del> I believe
hundred chances for <sic>it's</sic> being mischievous, <note><del>than it's being <gap/>,</del></note> same <add>of</add> for
<lb/>
<lb/>
notI conceive therefore , that there would be a
it's being usefulIn the 2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> place it is not
<lb/>
<lb/>
hundred chances for <sic>it's</sic> <gap/> mischievous , <gap/> for <add>of</add>
<sic>consider'd</sic> that by this Justicement <add>engine</add> with a very
 
<lb/>
 
little management the whole System of Penal
 
<lb/>
 
Justice might be laid in ruins:  <del><gap/></del> <add>as</add> discharge
<lb/>
from a prosecution by Judictment does not prevent <add>is no Bar</add>  
<lb/>
a prosecution by Appeal: but an acquittal on a
<lb/>
prosecution by Appeal , is to a prosecution by Judictment <add>+</add> <note>+ 2.    Hawkins 368</note> &#x2014; that by Appeal is under <add>entirely</add> the entire <sic>controul</sic>
<lb/>
of the private party, at a small price, &amp; which is some
<lb/></p>
<lb/></p>


Line 34: Line 45:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:54, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


CERTAINTY. APPEAL ++ ++ v. Fine to the Party - under PUNISHMENT this is continued from that Leaf. Pardon.

It is not so much as pretended, that the abuses
of this Prerogative are frequent: let us see for a moment,
what we should gain by the revival of this imagined
Remedy — In the first place When the application of it is left as it is to
such operators as hazard furnishes will any
body undertake that it shall be applied always
to the one case Where there is abuse, & never to
any of the hundred were there is none utility? I believe
not. I conceive therefore, that there would be a
hundred chances for it's being mischievous, than it's being , same of for
it's being useful. In the 2d place it is not
consider'd that by this Justicement engine with a very
little management the whole System of Penal
Justice might be laid in ruins: as discharge
from a prosecution by Judictment does not prevent is no Bar
a prosecution by Appeal: but an acquittal on a
prosecution by Appeal , is to a prosecution by Judictment + + 2. Hawkins 368 — that by Appeal is under entirely the entire controul
of the private party, at a small price, & which is some




Identifier: | JB/050/097/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

050

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

097

Info in main headings field

certainty appeal pardon

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j honig <…>

Marginals

Paper Producer

cc1

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16088

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in