JB/141/107/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/141/107/001: Difference between revisions

Kalasiris (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/141/107/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>13.<lb/>C<lb/>Forfeiture of Reputation</head>
 
<p>Upon looking over the list of punishments we shall<lb/>
 
find that it is to those which come under the name of<lb/>
corporal <add><del>personal</del></add> punishments that this property of reflecting an extraordinary<lb/>
degree of infamy is almost exclusively confined.<lb/>
Pecuniary punishments, which are the most common, are<lb/>
attended with a less degree of infamy than any other: unless<lb/>
it be quasi-pecuniary punishments; which in this respect<lb/>
as in most others are pretty much upon a par with<lb/>
pecuniary. Next to these come the several modes of confinement;<lb/>
among which if there be any difference,<lb/>
&#x2014; Imprisonment <del>and Loco-exclusion</del> seems the mildest in this respect, next to them Banishment, and Imprisonment<lb/>
the severest. <!-- This last sentence does not make sense as rendered: how can imprisonment be both the mildest and the severest? --> Of <del>restrictive</del> <add>specific restraints</add> and active punishments at<lb/>
large, they are so various that it is not easy to give an<lb/>
account. In general they seem to be on a footing with<lb/>
those punishments that are mildest in this respect unless<lb/>
where by means of analogy they are so contrived as to<lb/>
reflect and aggravate in a peculiar manner the infamy<lb/>
<add>of</add></p>
<note><del>The greatest <gap/> corporal punishment</del></note>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 16:16, 18 May 2020

Click Here To Edit

13.
C
Forfeiture of Reputation

Upon looking over the list of punishments we shall
find that it is to those which come under the name of
corporal personal punishments that this property of reflecting an extraordinary
degree of infamy is almost exclusively confined.
Pecuniary punishments, which are the most common, are
attended with a less degree of infamy than any other: unless
it be quasi-pecuniary punishments; which in this respect
as in most others are pretty much upon a par with
pecuniary. Next to these come the several modes of confinement;
among which if there be any difference,
— Imprisonment and Loco-exclusion seems the mildest in this respect, next to them Banishment, and Imprisonment
the severest. Of restrictive specific restraints and active punishments at
large, they are so various that it is not easy to give an
account. In general they seem to be on a footing with
those punishments that are mildest in this respect unless
where by means of analogy they are so contrived as to
reflect and aggravate in a peculiar manner the infamy
of

The greatest corporal punishment



Identifier: | JB/141/107/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 141.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

14

Box

141

Main Headings

rationale of punishment

Folio number

107

Info in main headings field

forfeiture of reputation

Image

001

Titles

note

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f13 / f14

Penner

Watermarks

myears

Marginals

Paper Producer

caroline fox

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

48324

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in