★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<note>Religion</note> | <note>Religion</note> | ||
<p> | |||
<add>cannot</add> be too great: nor can the legislator have any<lb/>thing to fear from <del>any</del> the success of any measures<lb/>he may <del>be</del> employ for the purpose of augmenting<lb/>it. The same thing <del>was</del> <add>nearly</add> might perhaps be said<lb/><note>The same judgment nearly <lb/>might perhaps be passed<lb/></note>in the case where the application of this force, <del>without<lb/> being subject to any human influence</del> is<lb/>determined <add>regulated</add> inexorably by the <del>p</del> dictates of utility,<lb/>without being subject to any human influence, except<lb/>in as far as the dictates of utility are<lb/>themselves liable to be modified by that influence:<lb/>the only danger here could be, lest the<lb/>interpretation put upon those dictates <add>notion entertained</add> by the people<lb/>should clash with the interpretation put upon them<lb/>by the legislator: <del>though this danger is no other</del><lb/>in this case the pertinacity of the people, well or<lb/>ill grounded may be expected to be greater when<lb/>thus enforced than if it had no other basis to<lb/>rest upon than their <del>sige</del> concern for <del>so much</del> <add>such part</add> of<lb/>their <add>mere</add> worldly interests as appear to be at stake<lb/>[upon the point in question].<lb/>If then the <del>dictates</del> bias assumed <add>possessed</add> by the religious sanction<lb/>be such that the dictates of it are not exactly<lb/>coincident with the dictates of utility, in such<lb/>case whether it be for the advantage of the commun-<lb/> -nity<note><lb/></note></p> | |||
<!-- This paragraph continues on page 087/026/004. --> | <!-- This paragraph continues on page 087/026/004. --> | ||
| Line 46: | Line 48: | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
Indirect Legislation
Religion
cannot be too great: nor can the legislator have any
thing to fear from any the success of any measures
he may be employ for the purpose of augmenting
it. The same thing was nearly might perhaps be said
The same judgment nearly
might perhaps be passed
in the case where the application of this force, without
being subject to any human influence is
determined regulated inexorably by the p dictates of utility,
without being subject to any human influence, except
in as far as the dictates of utility are
themselves liable to be modified by that influence:
the only danger here could be, lest the
interpretation put upon those dictates notion entertained by the people
should clash with the interpretation put upon them
by the legislator: though this danger is no other
in this case the pertinacity of the people, well or
ill grounded may be expected to be greater when
thus enforced than if it had no other basis to
rest upon than their sige concern for so much such part of
their mere worldly interests as appear to be at stake
[upon the point in question].
If then the dictates bias assumed possessed by the religious sanction
be such that the dictates of it are not exactly
coincident with the dictates of utility, in such
case whether it be for the advantage of the commun-
-nity
|
Identifier: | JB/087/026/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 87. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
14 |
|||
|
087 |
indirect legislation |
||
|
026 |
indirect legislation |
||
|
002 |
|||
|
text sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
f25 / f26 / f27 / f28 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::r williams [britannia with shield motif]]] |
||
|
c. hamilton |
|||
|
27551 |
|||
