JB/047/048/001: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 13:03, 7 August 2020

29 Apr. 1803
Ch.10 Evidence

Note (a)

As the Old Bailey Session in 1802,
Wilson fr was convicted of the murder of the wife and child by
pushing them into the Serpentine River in Hyde Park, where they
were drowned. The evidence, on which the conviction was grounded
was purely circumstantial evidence. No witness appeared
who saw have seen, or proposed to have seen the act, or any
of the parties at or very near at the time of the act.

3.
Example of conviction
of Murder on evidence
purely circumstantial.
Wilson, who drowned
his wife

Identifier: \| JB/047/048/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 47.
Date_1	1803-04-29	Marginal Summary Numbering	2a
Box	047	Main Headings	evidence
Folio number	048	Info in main headings field	ch. 4 evidence
Image	001	Titles	note (a)
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	d10
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	14916
Box Contents

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
-<head>29 Apr. 1803<lb/>Ch.10  Evidence</head><lb/> <lb/> <p>As the Old Bailey Supune in <add>Nov (a)</add> 1802,<lb/>
+<head>29 Apr. 1803<lb/>Ch.10  Evidence</head>
-Wihn <del>fr</del> was convicted of <add>the</add> murder of the wife and child by<lb/> pushing them into the serpentner River in thyde Park, when they<lb/> were  depturned the evidence, on <unclear>aluh</unclear> the conviction was governed<lb/> was surely circumstantial evidence. No witness appeared<lb/> who <unclear><add>could</add></unclear> have seen, or proposed to have seen the act, or any<lb/> parker at<add> or very near</add> at the time of the act.</p><p>3.<lb/>Prevention of <unclear>conclude</unclear><lb/>of Murder on condemn<lb/>purly <gap/> <unclear>Prender</unclear> <lb/> Wihm, who <gap/><lb/> his wife</p>
+<p>Note (a)</p>
+<p>As the Old Bailey Session in 1802,<lb/>
+Wilson <del>fr</del> was convicted of <add>the</add> murder of the wife and child by<lb/>
+pushing them into the Serpentine River in Hyde Park, where they<lb/>
+were drowned. The evidence, on which the conviction was grounded<lb/>
+was purely circumstantial evidence. No witness appeared<lb/>
+who <del>saw</del> have seen, or proposed to have seen the act, or any<lb/>
+of the parties at <add>or very near</add> at the time of the act.</p>
+<note>3.<lb/>Example of conviction<lb/>of Murder on evidence<lb/>purely circumstantial.<lb/>
+Wilson, who drowned<lb/> his wife</note>
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Views

JB/047/048/001: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 13:03, 7 August 2020

Navigation

Search