JB/047/263/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/047/263/001: Difference between revisions

Beanhedge (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
Dec 1801 <lb/> <head>Evidence</head><lb/>
Dec 1801 <lb/> <head>Evidence</head><lb/>


  Thus much <del><gap/> <gap/> of</del><add><del><gap/> <gap/></del> concerns</add> the <hi rend="underline">source</hi> of the evidence<lb/> or information <del>start of the paragraph</del> <add> <del> <unclear>defense</unclear> </del> </add> from<lb/> <del>they must for <hi rend="underline">the <gap/></hi> <gap/> <gap/> is <gap/> <gap/> </del>. n.<lb/> to the <gap/> of the shape in which the <unclear>rounded</unclear> for
  <p>This much <del><gap/> <gap/> of</del><add><del><gap/> <gap/></del> concerns</add> the <hi rend="underline">source</hi> of the evidence<lb/> or information <del>start of the paragraph</del> <add> <del> <unclear>defense</unclear> </del> </add> from<lb/> <del>they must for <hi rend="underline">the <gap/></hi> <gap/> <gap/> is <gap/> <gap/> </del>. n.<lb/> to the <gap/> as to the shape in which the foundation for <lb/><del><unclear></unclear></del><lb/> as above described, is happened to have made its<lb/><del><unclear></unclear></del><lb/> applause<add>of modern</add>, what is UNKNOWN enough is that law not only<lb/> is unfound though but the only <del><unclear></unclear></del> is alinead<lb/>shape.<lb/>There<del><unclear></unclear></del><add><!-- small box with smaller box in corner; --></add>, by means of I a variety<lb/><add>of all in much an of which under the <add>&#x2014;subscribes <del></del></add>name of a quant justification in camigraph and in congretional in UNKNOWN,<lb/>for infraction though</add>  Unfortunate number will be <gap/> a<lb/> tho confusion <unclear>although</unclear> from belongs to the unfortunate is their<lb/><del><unclear></unclear></del><lb/><del><unclear><lb/></unclear></del> Will formally by need to thus needed <lb/>addition, the importance of what will not to formed<lb/> is too your to injustice.</p>
 


<!-- In side column labeled with same small box--> <p>immunity importance<lb/>rate of things<lb/>among clients&#x2014;</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:55, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

Dec 1801
Evidence

This much of concerns the source of the evidence
or information start of the paragraph defense from
they must for the is . n.
to the as to the shape in which the foundation for

as above described, is happened to have made its

applauseof modern, what is UNKNOWN enough is that law not only
is unfound though but the only is alinead
shape.
There, by means of I a variety
of all in much an of which under the <add>—subscribes name of a quant justification in camigraph and in congretional in UNKNOWN,
for infraction though</add> Unfortunate number will be a
tho confusion although from belongs to the unfortunate is their


Will formally by need to thus needed
addition, the importance of what will not to formed
is too your to injustice.

immunity importance
rate of things
among clients—


Identifier: | JB/047/263/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 47.

Date_1

1811-12-04

Marginal Summary Numbering

4

Box

047

Main Headings

rationale of judicial evidence

Folio number

263

Info in main headings field

evidence

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d5 / e2 / f49

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

15131

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in