JB/087/077/003: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 16:49, 2 December 2020

39

Indirect Legislation

Satisfying

better by mere liberty. In this plan the government
were to have a monopoly in this branch
of business. But why so a monopoly? If the unlicensed
prostitutes courtezans could be discriminated from the licensed
by the same rule might they from modest women;
and in that case one of the three great objection against the establishment of liberty
in this respect
toleration of
these indulgences would be removed It would be sufficient That government
should open a shop of it's own might indeed
be of use: for by this means regulations might be
established in virtue of which the business might be
carried in a more commodious and safer manner
than it is at present the time in question by any private dealers undertakers: Re

To conclude, the toleration of
appears to be of use in some respects; the prohibition
of it in none. To adopt the To adopt apply
the principles laid down in another work
punishment to apply the phraseology made use laid down
of in another work, applied to th such a purpose is on three accounts improper
as being groundless, inefficacious & unprofitable.

points in which
more is to be done by liberty than by
all the government in
the world
Liberty in
trade, in ,
& in Religion

gulations for ex

Identifier: \| JB/087/077/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 87.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering	not numbered
Box	087	Main Headings	indirect legislation
Folio number	077	Info in main headings field	indirect legislation
Image	003	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f37 / f38 / f39 / f40
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	27602
Box Contents

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 <note>Satisfying</note>
-<add>better</add> by mere liberty.  In this plan the government<lb/>were to have a monopoly in this branch<lb/>of business.  But why <add>so</add> a monopoly? If the unlicensed<lb/>prostitutes <add><sic>courtezans</sic></add> could be discriminated from the licensed<lb/>by the same rule might they from modest women;<lb/>and in that case one <add>of the <del>these</del></add> great objection against the <note>establishement of liberty<lb/> in this respect<lb/></note> toleration of<lb/>these indulgences would be removed <del>It would be sufficient</del> that government<lb/>should open a shop of it's own might indeed<lb/>be of use: for by this means regulations might be<pb/>established in virtue of which the business might be<lb/>carried in a more commodious and safer manner<lb/>than it is at present <add>the time in question</add> by any private dealers <add>undertakers</add>: Re <lb/><!-- A horizontal line is drawn across the page, followed by a paragraph of text.  The continuation of the word that starts "Re" appear after that paragraph --><p>To conclude, the toleration of <!-- blank space --><lb/>appears to be of use in some respects; the prohibition<lb/>of it in none.  <del>To adopt the</del> To adopt <add>apply</add><lb/>the principles laid down in another work<lb/>punishment to apply the phraseology made use <add>laid down</add><lb/>of in another work, <add>applied to <del>th</del> such a purpose</add> is on three accounts improper<lb/>as being groundless, inefficacious &amp; unprofitable.<lb/></p>
+<p><add>better</add> by mere liberty.  In this plan the government<lb/>were to have a monopoly in this branch<lb/>of business.  But why <add>so</add> a monopoly? If the unlicensed<lb/>prostitutes <add><sic>courtezans</sic></add> could be discriminated from the licensed<lb/>by the same rule might they from modest women;<lb/>and in that case one <add>of the <del>three</del></add> great objection against the <note>establishment of liberty<lb/> in this respect<lb/></note> toleration of<lb/>these indulgences would be removed <del>It would be sufficient</del> That government<lb/>should open a shop of it's own might indeed<lb/>be of use: for by this means regulations might be<lb/>established in virtue of which the business might be<lb/>carried in a more commodious and safer manner<lb/>than it is at present <add>the time in question</add> by any private dealers <add>undertakers</add>: Re</p> <!-- A horizontal line is drawn across the page, followed by a paragraph of text.  The continuation of the word that starts "Re" appears on page 087/077/003 --><p>To conclude, the toleration of <!-- blank space --><lb/>appears to be of use in some respects; the prohibition<lb/>of it in none.  <del>To adopt the</del> To adopt <add>apply</add><lb/>the principles laid down in another work<lb/>punishment to apply the phraseology made use <add>laid down</add><lb/>of in another work, <add>applied to <del>th</del> such a purpose</add> is on three accounts improper<lb/>as being groundless, inefficacious &amp; unprofitable.<lb/></p>
+<note>points in which <lb/>more is to be done by liberty than by <lb/>all the government in<lb/>the world<lb/> Liberty in<lb/>trade, in <gap/>, <lb/>&amp; in Religion<lb/></note>
+<p><del>gulations for ex</del></p>
-<del>gulations for ex</del><lb/>
-<note>parts in which <lb/>more is to be done by liberty than by <lb/>all the <gap/> in<lb/>the world<lb/> Liberty is <gap/>, in <gap/> <lb/>&amp; in Religion<lb/></note><pb/>
@@ Line 56: / Line 58: @@
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Views

JB/087/077/003: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 16:49, 2 December 2020

Navigation

Search