★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
Auto approved |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
without being reduced in<lb/> | without being reduced in<lb/> | ||
quantity.</p> | quantity.</p> | ||
<p>2. Where the <del>direct justice</del><lb/> | <p>2. Where the <del>direct justice</del><lb/> | ||
evidence is excluded to<lb/> | evidence is excluded to<lb/> | ||
3. Where the ground of the<lb/> | |||
exclusion is the preventing<lb/> | exclusion is the preventing<lb/> | ||
a collateral & injustice<lb/> | a collateral & injustice<lb/> | ||
| Line 17: | Line 16: | ||
<del>the direct justice of the case</del> <lb/> | <del>the direct justice of the case</del> <lb/> | ||
<add>superior to that</add> <del>greater than the injustice</del><lb/> | <add>superior to that</add> <del>greater than the injustice</del><lb/> | ||
produced by the < | produced by the <unclear>succession</unclear><lb/> | ||
of the direct justice of the<lb/> | of the direct justice of the<lb/> | ||
case</p> | case</p> | ||
| Line 30: | Line 29: | ||
<p><!-- Red ink --><gap/> have the security from <lb/> | <p><!-- Red ink --><gap/> have the security from <lb/> | ||
<hi rend="underline">suspicion</hi></p> | <hi rend="underline">suspicion</hi></p> | ||
<p>2.<add><del> | <p>2.<add><del>Plaintiffs</del></add> Self-<gap/>belling evidence<lb/> | ||
foundations of danger<lb/> | foundations of danger<lb/> | ||
from the admission of it</p> | from the admission of it</p> | ||
| Line 47: | Line 46: | ||
<p><gap/> exclusion improper in general<lb/> | <p><gap/> exclusion improper in general<lb/> | ||
<hi rend="underline">Bias</hi> as ground for exclusion | <hi rend="underline">Bias</hi> as ground for exclusion | ||
<gap/> mendacity.</p> | <gap/> mendacity.</p><pb/> | ||
Ch 3. | <p>Ch 3. Cases in which Exclusion<lb/> | ||
of evidence may be proper or | of evidence may be proper or<lb/> | ||
Proper True Grounds for the exclusion of evidence | <add>Proper</add> True Grounds for the exclusion <lb/> | ||
— | of evidence</p> | ||
§1. Cases for exclusion of evidence | —<lb/> | ||
described in the mass comprehension | <p>§1. Cases for exclusion of evidence<lb/> | ||
terms | described in the mass comprehension <lb/> | ||
§.2. Cases where the quantity | terms</p> | ||
<p>§.2. Cases where the quantity<lb/> | |||
of evidence is <del>Ret</del><lb/> | of evidence is <del>Ret</del><lb/> | ||
diminished by the exclusion | diminished by the exclusion<lb/> | ||
viz: Disappointed, Makeshift | viz: Disappointed, Makeshift<lb/> | ||
and | and spontaneous <lb/> | ||
evidence. | evidence.</p> | ||
§ 3. Case when <gap/> along with the evidence the direct | <p>§ 3. Case when <del><gap/></del> along <lb/> | ||
justice of | with the evidence the direct<lb/> | ||
up to save avoid producing | justice of the case is given<lb/> | ||
a greater <gap/>al injustice | up to <add>save</add> avoid producing<lb/> | ||
Ch.3 | a greater <gap/>al injustice</p> | ||
§1. General idea of cases | <p>Ch.3</p> | ||
warranting the exclusion of | <p>§1. General idea of cases<lb/> | ||
evidence | warranting the exclusion of<lb/> | ||
§ 2. Exclusion of casual evidence | evidence</p> | ||
to let in preappointed | <p>§ 2. Exclusion of casual evidence<lb/> | ||
§ 3. Exclusion of | to let in <unclear>preappointed</unclear></p> | ||
evidence to let in unobjectionable | <p>§ 3. Exclusion of makeshift<lb/> | ||
§ 4. Exclusion of spontaneous | evidence to let in unobjectionable</p> | ||
to | <p>§ 4. Exclusion of spontaneous<lb/> | ||
Ch.4 | <hi rend="underline">to l</hi>et in <add><gap/></add> elicited evidence</p> | ||
§ 5 Exclusion of evidence for Ch.5 | <p>Ch.4</p> | ||
avoidance of vexation | <p>§ 5 Exclusion of evidence for <lb/> | ||
Ch.6 | <del>Ch.5</del><lb/> | ||
§ 6. Exclusion of evidence | avoidance of vexation</p> | ||
for avoidance of | <p>Ch.6</p> | ||
Ch.7. | <p>§ 6. Exclusion of evidence <lb/> | ||
§.7. | for avoidance of expence</p> | ||
for avoidance of delay | <p>Ch.7.</p> | ||
Ch.8 | <p>§.7. Exclusion of evidence<lb/> | ||
§ 8. Exclusion of evidence | for avoidance of delay</p> | ||
on the ground of irrelevancy | <p>Ch.8</p> | ||
<p>§ 8. Exclusion of evidence<lb/> | |||
on the ground of irrelevancy</p><pb/> | |||
Interest | <p>Interest-Pecun<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> Exceptions</p> | ||
1. Necessity | <p>1. Necessity</p> | ||
2. Wager | <p>2. Wager</p> | ||
3. Release | <p>3. Release</p> | ||
4 Ambilateral | <p>4 Ambilateral</p> | ||
5 Contingent | <p><hi rend="underline">5 Contingent</hi></p> | ||
6. Course of trade | <p>6. Course of trade</p> | ||
7. Verdict pleadable | <p>7. Verdict <add>not</add>pleadable</p> | ||
1. Microscopic excludes | <p>1. Microscopic excludes</p> | ||
2. Moral excludes | <p>2. Moral excludes</p> | ||
3. Voir- | <p>3. Voir-dirs excludes</p> | ||
4. <gap/>-supposed | <p>4. <gap/>-supposed excludes</p> | ||
5. Quo tempore? | <p>5. Quo tempore?</p><pb/> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
Exclusion proper
1. Where a consequence of exclusion the mass of evidence
is improved in quality
without being reduced in
quantity.
2. Where the direct justice
evidence is excluded to
3. Where the ground of the
exclusion is the preventing
a collateral & injustice
superior to counteracting
the direct justice of the case
superior to that greater than the injustice
produced by the succession
of the direct justice of the
case
—
30 Decr 18023
Pecuniary Interest
Chapters or Sections
Ch 1. Pecuniary interest
peculiar impropriety
of exclusion on this score.
have the security from
suspicion
2.Plaintiffs Self-belling evidence
foundations of danger
from the admission of it
3 — its innoxiousness
proved by experience
in the most dangerous
cases
4. Existing Securities against
against the danger.
5. Ulterior securities
indicated.]
6. English law — its inconsistencies
in the subject
of pecuniarity interested evidence.
exclusion improper in general
Bias as ground for exclusion
mendacity.
---page break---
Ch 3. Cases in which Exclusion
of evidence may be proper or
Proper True Grounds for the exclusion
of evidence
—
§1. Cases for exclusion of evidence
described in the mass comprehension
terms
§.2. Cases where the quantity
of evidence is Ret
diminished by the exclusion
viz: Disappointed, Makeshift
and spontaneous
evidence.
§ 3. Case when along
with the evidence the direct
justice of the case is given
up to save avoid producing
a greater al injustice
Ch.3
§1. General idea of cases
warranting the exclusion of
evidence
§ 2. Exclusion of casual evidence
to let in preappointed
§ 3. Exclusion of makeshift
evidence to let in unobjectionable
§ 4. Exclusion of spontaneous
to let in elicited evidence
Ch.4
§ 5 Exclusion of evidence for
Ch.5
avoidance of vexation
Ch.6
§ 6. Exclusion of evidence
for avoidance of expence
Ch.7.
§.7. Exclusion of evidence
for avoidance of delay
Ch.8
§ 8. Exclusion of evidence
on the ground of irrelevancy
---page break---
Interest-Pecuny Exceptions
1. Necessity
2. Wager
3. Release
4 Ambilateral
5 Contingent
6. Course of trade
7. Verdict notpleadable
1. Microscopic excludes
2. Moral excludes
3. Voir-dirs excludes
4. -supposed excludes
5. Quo tempore?
---page break---
|
Identifier: | JB/109/007/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 109. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1803-12-09 |
|||
|
109 |
Evidence |
||
|
007 |
Evidence |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
Rudiments sheet (brouillon) |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
1800 |
|||
|
1800 |
|||
|
35662 |
|||
