★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
<note>Secret informations</note> | <note>Secret informations</note> | ||
<p><del>inquiry</del> <add>enquiry.</add> In the one event he takes no notice of<lb/>it: in the other he gives notice for the informer<lb/>to make his personal appearance. If upon <del>being<lb/>examined</del> taking | <p><del>inquiry</del> <add>enquiry.</add> In the one event he takes no notice of<lb/>it: in the other he gives notice for the informer<lb/>to make his personal appearance. If upon <del>being<lb/>examined</del> taking his examination <add>hearing what he has to say</add> the result of the<lb/>examination is that the informant has been in an<lb/>error either with regard to the law or the fact, he<lb/>is sent back with thanks for his good intentions,<lb/>and his name if he thinks fit concealed: if it<lb/>be that there is malice in the case, his name<lb/>and his information are communicated to the party<lb/>informed against: if it be that the charge is<lb/>true <del>security is taken</del> a prosecution is instituted<lb/>and security is taken of the informant to<lb/>be ready with his evidence.<lb/></p><p><del>Will it be asked what are <add>would be any</add> the advantages of<lb/>such an arrangement? <add>institution would be of? of just the same</add> just the same sort as<lb/>those that of taking votes in the way of ballot<lb/></del></p><p>Will it be asked upon what principle <del>mak</del><lb/>an institution of this sort would be advantageous?<lb/>Upon just the same as that of taking votes by ballot.<lb/><add><del>Sooner or later</del></add> When a prosecution has <add>been</add> resolved <add>upon, sooner or later</add> the defendant<lb/>must at all events be <sic>apprized</sic> <del>of the</del> who <add>are</add> the witnesses<lb/><del>are</del> that are or are to be produced against him. But<lb/>before that period why should he? In the first place<lb/>the witness if he has any thing to apprehend from the<lb/> <note>enmity</note></p> | ||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
22
Indirect
Misrule
Secret informations
inquiry enquiry. In the one event he takes no notice of
it: in the other he gives notice for the informer
to make his personal appearance. If upon being
examined taking his examination hearing what he has to say the result of the
examination is that the informant has been in an
error either with regard to the law or the fact, he
is sent back with thanks for his good intentions,
and his name if he thinks fit concealed: if it
be that there is malice in the case, his name
and his information are communicated to the party
informed against: if it be that the charge is
true security is taken a prosecution is instituted
and security is taken of the informant to
be ready with his evidence.
Will it be asked what are would be any the advantages of
such an arrangement? institution would be of? of just the same just the same sort as
those that of taking votes in the way of ballot
Will it be asked upon what principle mak
an institution of this sort would be advantageous?
Upon just the same as that of taking votes by ballot.
Sooner or later When a prosecution has been resolved upon, sooner or later the defendant
must at all events be apprized of the who are the witnesses
are that are or are to be produced against him. But
before that period why should he? In the first place
the witness if he has any thing to apprehend from the
enmity
Identifier: | JB/087/123/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 87. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
087 |
indirect legislation |
||
123 |
indirect |
||
002 |
|||
text sheet |
4 |
||
recto |
f21 / f22 / f23 / f24 |
||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]] |
||
27648 |
|||