★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<head>Indirect Legislation</head> | <head>Indirect Legislation</head> | ||
<p> | |||
<add>the</add> conclusiveness of the inference. In this case<lb/>the creation of such an offence comes to nearly <lb/>the same thing as to suggest <add>the fact in question</add> to the judge in<lb/>the way of instruction under the character of an<lb/>evidentiary circumstance. There is only the difference <lb/>that in the one <add>latter</add> case the legislator puts<lb/>it to the judge to | <add>the</add> conclusiveness of the inference. In this case<lb/>the creation of such an offence comes to nearly <lb/>the same thing as to suggest <add>the fact in question</add> to the judge in<lb/>the way of instruction under the character of an<lb/>evidentiary circumstance. There is only the difference <lb/>that in the one <add>latter</add> case the legislator puts<lb/>it to the judge to make the inference, whereas in<lb/>the former he makes the inference himself, reserving<lb/> only a power in the judge to repel it <note>If he should think<lb/> proper<lb/></note> in the<lb/>event of his finding any special reason <add>for so doing</add> [in any<lb/>given instance for looking upon it as inconclusive]<lb/><del>Upon</del> In the latter <add>plan</add> the conclusion is most likely to take<lb/>place: in the former it <del>requ</del> requires an<lb/> effort to establish it: on the <del>other</del> latter <add><del>in establis</del></add> it requires an<lb/>effort to overthrow it. <add><del>Ceteris</del></add> That side of an alternative<lb/>has ceteris paribus the best chance which has the<lb/><hi rend="underline">vis inertiæ</hi> of the <del>brain</del> mind in its favour. Whichever<lb/>scale the vis inertiæ of the mind is thrown into possesses<lb/>a great advantage.</p> | ||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
16
Indirect Legislation
the conclusiveness of the inference. In this case
the creation of such an offence comes to nearly
the same thing as to suggest the fact in question to the judge in
the way of instruction under the character of an
evidentiary circumstance. There is only the difference
that in the one latter case the legislator puts
it to the judge to make the inference, whereas in
the former he makes the inference himself, reserving
only a power in the judge to repel it If he should think
proper
in the
event of his finding any special reason for so doing [in any
given instance for looking upon it as inconclusive]
Upon In the latter plan the conclusion is most likely to take
place: in the former it requ requires an
effort to establish it: on the other latter in establis it requires an
effort to overthrow it. Ceteris That side of an alternative
has ceteris paribus the best chance which has the
vis inertiæ of the brain mind in its favour. Whichever
scale the vis inertiæ of the mind is thrown into possesses
a great advantage.
|
Identifier: | JB/087/175/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 87. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
087 |
indirect legislation |
||
|
175 |
indirect legislation |
||
|
004 |
|||
|
text sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
f15 / f16 / f17 / f18 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]] |
||
|
27700 |
|||
