JB/122/287/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/122/287/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/122/287/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:


<!-- header and marginal summaries in pencil -->
<!-- header and marginal summaries in pencil -->
<p>10 <sic>Aug.</sic> 1808<lb/><note>To Mallet</note><lb/>(2) <note>V. Irresponsibility<lb/>Minutes no check</note></p> <p><note>3<lb/>The <add>only</add> transgressors against<lb/>which in the way of<lb/>which such registration<lb/>can be a use, are such<lb/>as are not likely to be<lb/>committed.</note></p> <p>When any thing <gap/>, Minute Books are closed<lb/>Whitcomb <gap/> with Sense is &#x2014; closed for his <unclear>support</unclear></p> <p><add>In a word</add> the transgressions against which I see no reason to dispute<lb/>the efficacy of the supposed check in question &#x2014; viz. entry<lb/>made or not made in <del><gap/></del> a secret <add>and invisible</add> Minute Book are<lb/><add>all</add> such transgressions as without any such <add>that or any other</add> check, the<lb/>Members would not any of them be likely to fall into</p> <p><note>4<lb/>Against such as<lb/>are likely to be committed: except such<lb/>one as here complained<lb/>of, <del>the pr</del> (viz. production<lb/>of useless vexation)<lb/>they do not<lb/>operate.</note></p> <p>The transgressions <add>and the only transgressions</add> against which I see <add>any</add> reason to<lb/>dispatch the <add>supposed</add> efficiency of the supposed check in question<lb/>are such as but for the sort of check in question<lb/>it is altogether natural that in the sort of situation in<lb/>question none in general should be continually falling:<lb/>such in short <add>for example</add> as those into which in the individual<lb/>occasion I have in view, gentlemen did really <add>actually to a certain degree</add> fall<lb/>though perhaps without being aware of it: abetting<lb/>vexation, <del>not</del> superfluous and useless vexation &#x2014; not by<lb/>means and in consequence of misdirected thought &#x2014; but,<lb/>in the <gap/> whistled, for want of it <add>thought</add></p>   
<p>10 <sic>Aug.</sic> 1808<lb/><note>To Mallet</note><lb/>(2) <note>V. Irresponsibility<lb/>Minutes no check</note></p> <p><note>3<lb/>The <add>only</add> transgressions against<lb/>which in the way of<lb/>check such registration<lb/>can be of use, are such<lb/>as are not likely to be<lb/>committed.</note></p> <p>When any thing <gap/>, Minute Books are closed<lb/>Whitcomb then with Sense is &#x2014; <unclear>closed</unclear> for his <unclear>support</unclear></p> <p><add>In a word</add> The transgressions against which I see no reason to dispute<lb/>the efficacy of the supposed check in question &#x2014; viz. entry<lb/>made or not made in <del><gap/></del> a secret <add>and invisible</add> Minute Book are<lb/><add>all</add> such transgressions as without any such <add>that or any other</add> check, the<lb/>Members would not any of them be likely to fall into</p> <p><note>4<lb/>Against such as<lb/>are likely to be committed:<lb/>except such<lb/>one as here complained<lb/>of, <del>the pr</del> (viz. production<lb/>of useless vexation)<lb/>they do not<lb/>operate.</note></p> <p>The transgressions <add>and the only transgressions</add> against which I see <add>any</add> reason to<lb/>dispatch the <add>supposed</add> efficiency of the supposed check in question<lb/>are such as, but for the sort of check in question<lb/>it is altogether natural that in the sort of situation in<lb/>question none in general should be continually falling:<lb/>such in short <add>for example</add> as those into which on the individual<lb/>occasion I have in view, gentlemen did really <add>actually to a certain degree</add> fall<lb/>though perhaps without being aware of it: abetting<lb/>vexation, <del>not</del> superfluous and useless vexation &#x2014; not by<lb/>means and in consequence of misdirected thought &#x2014; but,<lb/>in the <gap/> whistled, for want of it <add>thought</add></p>   






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 15:30, 25 January 2021

'Click Here To Edit

10 Aug. 1808
To Mallet
(2) V. Irresponsibility
Minutes no check

3
The only transgressions against
which in the way of
check such registration
can be of use, are such
as are not likely to be
committed.

When any thing , Minute Books are closed
Whitcomb then with Sense is — closed for his support

In a word The transgressions against which I see no reason to dispute
the efficacy of the supposed check in question — viz. entry
made or not made in a secret and invisible Minute Book are
all such transgressions as without any such that or any other check, the
Members would not any of them be likely to fall into

4
Against such as
are likely to be committed:
except such
one as here complained
of, the pr (viz. production
of useless vexation)
they do not
operate.

The transgressions and the only transgressions against which I see any reason to
dispatch the supposed efficiency of the supposed check in question
are such as, but for the sort of check in question
it is altogether natural that in the sort of situation in
question none in general should be continually falling:
such in short for example as those into which on the individual
occasion I have in view, gentlemen did really actually to a certain degree fall
though perhaps without being aware of it: abetting
vexation, not superfluous and useless vexation — not by
means and in consequence of misdirected thought — but,
in the whistled, for want of it thought




Identifier: | JB/122/287/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

1808-08-10

Marginal Summary Numbering

3-4

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

287

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

C2

Penner

Watermarks

TH 1806

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Andre Morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

See note 5 to letter 1986, vol. 7

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in