JB/078/215/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/078/215/001: Difference between revisions

WilsonC (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/078/215/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 11:18, 22 February 2021

Click Here To Edit

1826. Decr 12.
J. B. v. Sugden.
Codification approved.

p. 19 "Unnecessary lengths might perhaps be checked
by the publication, by the authority of Government,
of forms of the instruments in common use, settled
by competent persons, containing, on the one
hand, all proper provisions fully expressed in the
settled language of conveyancing, and on the other
hand rejecting all redundant and tautologous expressions."



Identifier: | JB/078/215/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78.

Date_1

1826-12-12

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

078

Main Headings

Review of Humphreys

Folio number

215

Info in main headings field

JB v. Sugden

Image

001

Titles

Category

Copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

25306

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in