JB/042/108/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/108/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:


6.3. As <del>child</del> correspondent <add>evidence of propriety is thus exacted</add><del>check is applied is attached</del><lb/>
6.3. As <del>child</del> correspondent <add>evidence of propriety is thus exacted</add><del>check is applied is attached</del><lb/>
In two place <del><gap/></del> and from the persons inclined of one at is <gap/> that the<lb/>
In two place <del><gap/></del> and from two persons inclined of one it is <gap/> that the<lb/>
money has been paid. 2 for what service it is paid: 3. that the subject matter for <note>which it is paid has been<lb/>
money has been paid. 2 for what service it is paid: 3. that the subject matter for <note>which it is paid has been<lb/>
in the possession or at the disposal<lb/>
in the possession or at <lb/>
of the payer.</note><lb/>
the disposal of the payer.</note><lb/>


<note>or 4<lb/>
<p>7  3. The orders of the payment and the mater of the <lb/>
payment over these two distinct persons they are <add>serve</add> each of <lb/>
them as a check upon the others: the orderes by his order,<lb/>
<del>or</del> acknowledges and witnesses that he has received the subject matter<lb/>
in return for which it was<add>is</add> issued: the payer <add>must have</add> has this same<lb/>
order as evidence that is was<add>is</add> not without just cause and<lb/>
sufficient warrant <del>that</del> in respect of service rendered to the public<lb/>
that the money is paid by him: <add>an instrument of might </add> a receipt would<lb/>
suffice to <sic>shew</sic> that the money as paid, and to whom<lb/>
paid: but it could not suffice <add> in <gap/></add> to <sic>shew</sic> that it is in the<lb/>
account of the public service that it was<add>is</add> paid</p>
 
<note><!-- Marginal note in pencil -->or 4<lb/>
Art.4. III. Frugality promoted;<lb/>
Art.4. III. Frugality promoted;<lb/>
to wit by additional<lb/>
to wit by additional<lb/>
<gap/> against <gap/>lition<lb/>
scarcely against <gap/>lation<lb/>
and embezzlement<lb/>
and embezzlement<lb/>
Suppose one person only<lb/>
Suppose one person only<lb/>
Line 50: Line 62:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:41, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1824 Sept 8

Constitutional Code

Ch. XI. Minister
§. 13. Finance Minister

6.3. As child correspondent evidence of propriety is thus exactedcheck is applied is attached
In two place and from two persons inclined of one it is that the
money has been paid. 2 for what service it is paid: 3. that the subject matter for which it is paid has been
in the possession or at
the disposal of the payer.

7 3. The orders of the payment and the mater of the
payment over these two distinct persons they are serve each of
them as a check upon the others: the orderes by his order,
or acknowledges and witnesses that he has received the subject matter
in return for which it wasis issued: the payer must have has this same
order as evidence that is wasis not without just cause and
sufficient warrant that in respect of service rendered to the public
that the money is paid by him: an instrument of might a receipt would
suffice to shew that the money as paid, and to whom
paid: but it could not suffice in to shew that it is in the
account of the public service that it wasis paid

or 4
Art.4. III. Frugality promoted;
to wit by additional
scarcely against lation
and embezzlement
Suppose one person only
occupied both in procuring
the article and pay as for it
that one person above
would be answerable for the
propriety of the payment
and one person above to wit at some person.and for the public service
employ in the business the
two persons in question
the operation acknowledge
his har procured the
article, and his having
ordered payment for it:
which the paying functionary,
shews by the ded
which serves how as
a voucher, that it was
paid for public service
as well as by his entry
that it in not if his
hands.
In either office should the
do retention to the transaction
be lost, that belonging
to the others may serve as
a memorial of it.




Identifier: | JB/042/108/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1822-09-08

Marginal Summary Numbering

or 4

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

108

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d6 / e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1822

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1822

Notes public

ID Number

13031

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in