JB/011/202/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/011/202/001: Difference between revisions

JMagnus (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(9 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>J. B. to Sec. Peel</head>
<head>J. B. to Sec.<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> Peel</head>
<note>5.</note>


<p>Another question would be <add>&#x2014;</add> whether, if the universal security plan were to the established, the Equity Courts could, even with diminished profits, keep their ground? Not <hi rend="underline">ultimately</hi>, most assuredly. For giving execution and effect to the substantive branch of the law, two sets of <unclear>judicators </unclear> giving at the same time execution and effect to the mutually repugnant, though both but imaginary, masses of substantive law, are no more necessary, than two men in a boat, one rowing one way the other opposite way are, for reaching the landing place. Each is self confessedly inadequate - both together, not only flagrantly inadequate, but <unclear>completely</unclear> hostile, to the purposes of justice. An all-embracing system of obscurity and profligacy termed <hi rend="underline">technicality,</hi> as Mr. Humphrey's Property Code, (and nothing better can be said of it)- this <hi rend="underline">Procedure system,</hi> together with an indispensably correspondent <hi rend="underline">Judiciary Establishment,</hi> establishable without Parliamentary Reform, and suspending in no small degree the demand for it, is in forwardness, and will call from your <del><gap/></del> <add>countenance</add> or <del><gap/></del> <add>discountenance</add> before a twelvemonth is at an end: a system the first that even was yet in any country, in point of fact directed, and without any deviation, to the ends of justice, that is to say, to the giving execution and effect, with the least <add><unclear>profit</unclear></add> uncertainty, delay, <unclear>vocation</unclear>, and expense, <add><del><gap/></del></add> to the arrangements made or endeavoured to be made by the <hi rend="underline">sovereign legislation authority,</hi> in whatever hands placed; substituting thus the only defensible to the <hi rend="underline">actual ends of judicature,</hi> which, with the exception of the necessary</p>
<p>Another question would be <add>&#x2014;</add> whether, if the universal security<lb/>
plan were to the established, the Equity Courts could,<lb/>
even with diminished profits, keep their ground? Not <hi rend="underline">ultimately</hi>,<lb/>
most assuredly. For giving execution and effect to the<lb/>
substantive branch of the law, two sets of Judicatories giving at <lb/>
the same time execution and effect to two mutually repugnant, <lb/>
though both but imaginary, masses of substantive law, are no <lb/>
more necessary, than two men in a boat, one rowing one way <lb/>
the other the opposite way are, for reaching the landing place. <lb/>
Each is self confessedly inadequate &#x2014; both together, not only flagrantly<lb/> inadequate, but compleatly hostile, to the purposes of justice. <lb/>
An all-embracing system of natural procedure, as pure from<lb/>
that mixture of absurdity and profligacy termed <hi rend="underline">technicality</hi>,<lb/>
as M.<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Humphrey's Property Code, (and nothing better can be<lb/>
said of it,) &#x2014; this <hi rend="underline">Procedure System</hi>, together with an indispensably <lb/>
correspondent <add>concomstant and</add> <hi rend="underline">Judiciary Establishment</hi>, establishable without <lb/>
Parliamentary Reform, and superseding in no small degree the <lb/>
demand for it, is in forwardness, and will call for your <del>adoption</del> <add>countenance</add> <lb/>
or <del>rejection</del> <add>discountenance</add> before a twelvemonth is at an end: a system the <lb/>
first that ever was yet in any country, in point of fact directed, <lb/>
and without any deviation, to the ends of Justice, that is <lb/>
to say to the giving execution and effect, with the least <add>possible</add> uncertainty,<lb/>
delay, vexation and expense, <add><del>possible</del></add> to the arrangements made or endeavoured <lb/>
to be made by the <hi rend="underline">sovereign legislation authority</hi>, in <lb/>
whatever hands placed; substituting thus the only defensible to<lb/>
the <hi rend="underline">actual ends of judicature</hi>, which, with the exception of the<lb/>
<add>necessary</add></p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 12:25, 22 July 2021

Click Here To Edit

J. B. to Sec.y Peel 5.

Another question would be whether, if the universal security
plan were to the established, the Equity Courts could,
even with diminished profits, keep their ground? Not ultimately,
most assuredly. For giving execution and effect to the
substantive branch of the law, two sets of Judicatories giving at
the same time execution and effect to two mutually repugnant,
though both but imaginary, masses of substantive law, are no
more necessary, than two men in a boat, one rowing one way
the other the opposite way are, for reaching the landing place.
Each is self confessedly inadequate — both together, not only flagrantly
inadequate, but compleatly hostile, to the purposes of justice.
An all-embracing system of natural procedure, as pure from
that mixture of absurdity and profligacy termed technicality,
as M.r Humphrey's Property Code, (and nothing better can be
said of it,) — this Procedure System, together with an indispensably
correspondent concomstant and Judiciary Establishment, establishable without
Parliamentary Reform, and superseding in no small degree the
demand for it, is in forwardness, and will call for your adoption countenance
or rejection discountenance before a twelvemonth is at an end: a system the
first that ever was yet in any country, in point of fact directed,
and without any deviation, to the ends of Justice, that is
to say to the giving execution and effect, with the least possible uncertainty,
delay, vexation and expense, possible to the arrangements made or endeavoured
to be made by the sovereign legislation authority, in
whatever hands placed; substituting thus the only defensible to
the actual ends of judicature, which, with the exception of the
necessary



Identifier: | JB/011/202/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

011

Main Headings

law amendment

Folio number

202

Info in main headings field

jb to secy peel

Image

001

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f5 / f6 / f7 / f8

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

w weatherley 1825

Marginals

Paper Producer

fr2

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1825

Notes public

ID Number

3899

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in