★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
m Protected "JB/047/054/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>Evidence</head> | |||
<p><gap/>6 June 1803 | |||
Court of King's Bench, June 4. Sitting before Lord Ellenborough and <unclear>special</unclear><lb/>James. <unclear>Pybus</unclear> and others V. <unclear>Dunel</unclear>.</p> | |||
<p>Mr Gibbs stated that this action was brought by the Plaintiffs,<lb/>who are <unclear>Baukers</unclear> in London, against the Defendant, who was <unclear>surety</unclear><lb/>for Mr <unclear>Fronsow</unclear>, who was a Bauker at Pontefract, to recover the<lb/>amount of a Bond for £500 which was given to long ago as the<lb/>year 1785. The defendant had pleaded this land was not his<lb/>deed, although in his answer in <gap/> for this <gap/> was<lb/> in that Court he had fully admitted it. There were two subscribing <lb/>witnesses to this land, but they could not be found, and therefore<lb/>Mr Gibbs purported to the read the Defendant answers in chancery, in<lb/>order to prove the bond was executed by him. He said every search<lb/>had been made after the subscribing witnesses, and they had not<lb/>been able to find them.</p> | |||
<p>After some evidence had been provided, it appeared that due<<lb/>diligence had not been and to find out there witnesses, and Lord<lb/>Ellenborough observed, that unless they were dead, or residing in some<lb/>foreign country, he could not dispense with their absence. A subscribing<lb/>witnesses might prove fifty things; he might prove the Defendant<lb/>was drunk when he was executed the bond, which would be <unclear>answer</unclear> to the<lb/>action of a plea of <gap/><gap/> faction.</p> | |||
Plaintiff <gap/> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
Evidence
6 June 1803
Court of King's Bench, June 4. Sitting before Lord Ellenborough and special
James. Pybus and others V. Dunel.
Mr Gibbs stated that this action was brought by the Plaintiffs,
who are Baukers in London, against the Defendant, who was surety
for Mr Fronsow, who was a Bauker at Pontefract, to recover the
amount of a Bond for £500 which was given to long ago as the
year 1785. The defendant had pleaded this land was not his
deed, although in his answer in for this was
in that Court he had fully admitted it. There were two subscribing
witnesses to this land, but they could not be found, and therefore
Mr Gibbs purported to the read the Defendant answers in chancery, in
order to prove the bond was executed by him. He said every search
had been made after the subscribing witnesses, and they had not
been able to find them.
After some evidence had been provided, it appeared that due<
diligence had not been and to find out there witnesses, and Lord
Ellenborough observed, that unless they were dead, or residing in some
foreign country, he could not dispense with their absence. A subscribing
witnesses might prove fifty things; he might prove the Defendant
was drunk when he was executed the bond, which would be answer to the
action of a plea of faction.
Plaintiff
|
Identifier: | JB/047/054/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 47. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1803-06-17 |
not numbered |
||
|
047 |
evidence |
||
|
054 |
evidence |
||
|
001 |
times 6 june 1803 |
||
|
collectanea |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
john herbert koe |
1800 |
||
|
1800 |
|||
|
14922 |
|||
