JB/124/034/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/124/034/002: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
<!-- header in pencil -->
<!-- header in pencil -->


<p>6<lb/><note>Reasons</note> Panopticon Bill Choice</p> <p>and the <add>choice of the</add> present situation <del>pitched upon</del> <add>confirmed</add> in preference<lb/>to that prior choice, as being unexceptionable on<lb/>every point, <add><del>will on that ground/in this point as on any other</del></add> <del>and</del> <add>but more</add> particularly on this.</p> <p>Nor would Administration itself be less exposed<lb/>to obloquy <del>from such a change.  Why turn aside</del> <add>by such a change. &#x2014; What is <del>What could have turned<del> him</add><lb/> <add>it that could thus have turned them aside</add> (it would be said) from the line already marked<lb/>out by impartial justice? &#x2014;  What but the overweening<lb/>influence of powerful individuals? <del>The</del> <add>After a <del><gap/></del> three</add><lb/><add>years search, the</add> best possible situation had been found out by<lb/>the most competent authority: but an Archbishop<lb/>and an Earl stood in the way, and so a less<lb/> <del>eligible</del> <Add>fit</add> one was to be looked out for.  <del>The Villas <add>The Villas</add></del><lb/><del>of <add>of</add></del> Ministers too <del>had</del> <add>have</add> their Vilas that way: and<lb/>they did not choose to have their road darkened<lb/>by such objects <del>[+]</del> In the measure to be postponed <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note><del>In the plan to be postponed</del><lb/><hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <sic>till</sic> a situation<lb/>can be found for it<lb/>which is not within<lb/>the ride of a Minister<lb/>or a Lord?  Its<lb/>execution then is<lb/>not likely <add><del>in a way</del></add> to be very<lb/>speedy. &#x2014; <del><unclear>To all</unclear></del> <add>Would</add> the<lb/><add>new</add> <sic>controuling</sic> body,<lb/>would the Judges, <del>accept</del> <add> so much as</add> <lb/><del>of</del> <add>listen to any</add> such <del>an</del> instruction?<lb/>If not,<lb/><del>it may</del> the change<del>ing</del><lb/><add>may be</add> from the drying pan<lb/>to the fire.</note><!-- paragraph mark --></p> <p>In proportion too as the new plan was <add>generally</add> approved,<lb/>would the damp <add>thus</add> cast upon it be<lb/>condemned.  When <del>£250,000</del> <add>£200,000 and more<a/dd> of the public<lb/>money was to be spent before the smallest benefit<lb/>could be reaped the <del.<gap/></del> situation was not grudged.<lb/>An <del>individual undertaker appears who</del> <add>offer is accepted which</add> begins<lb/>with <del><gap/></del> easing the nation of this load in the first<lb/>instance, to say nothing of <del>the money</del> <add>what</add> other advantages<lb/><del>which distinguish</del> <add><sic>concurr</sic> in distinguishing</add> the new plan from the old<lb/><del>one</del>, and now the situation is too good. <del>an one</del> The<lb/><add><del>The</del> Supervisors</add></p>
<p>6<lb/><note>Reasons</note> Panopticon Bill Choice</p> <p>and the <add>choice of the</add> present situation <del>pitched upon</del> <add>confirmed</add> in preference<lb/>to that prior choice, as being unexceptionable on<lb/>every point, <add><del>will on that ground/on this point as on any other</del></add> <del>and</del> <add>but more</add> particularly on this.</p> <p>Nor would Administration itself be less exposed<lb/>to obloquy <del>from so <gap/> a change.  Why turn aside</del> <add>by such a change. &#x2014; What is <del>What could have turned</del> <unclear>him</unclear></add><lb/> <add>it that could thus have turned them aside</add> (it would be said) from the line already marked<lb/>out by impartial justice? &#x2014;  What but the overweening<lb/>influence of powerful individuals? <del>The</del> <add>After a <del><gap/></del> three</add><lb/><add>years search, the</add> best possible situation had been found out by<lb/>the most competent authority: but an Archbishop<lb/>and an Earl stood in the way, and so a less<lb/> <del>eligible</del> <Add>fit</add> one was to be looked out for.  <del>The Villas <add>The Villas</add></del><lb/><del>of <add>of</add></del> Ministers too <del>had</del> <add>have</add> their Vilas that way: and<lb/>they did not choose to have their road darkened<lb/>by such objects <del>[+]</del> In the measure to be postponed <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note><del>In the plan to be postponed</del><lb/><hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <sic>till</sic> a situation<lb/>can be found for it<lb/>which is not within<lb/>the ride of a Minister<lb/>or a Lord?  Its<lb/>execution then is<lb/>not likely <add><del>in a hurry</del></add> to be very<lb/>speedy. &#x2014; <del><unclear>To all</unclear></del> <add>Would</add> the<lb/><add>new</add> <sic>controuling</sic> body,<lb/>would the Judges, <del>accept</del> <add> so much as</add> <lb/><del>of</del> <add>listen to any</add> such <del>an</del> instruction?<lb/>If not,<lb/><del>it may</del> the change<del>ing</del><lb/><add>may be</add> from the drying pan<lb/>to the fire.</note><!-- paragraph mark --></p> <p>In proportion too as the new plan was <add>generally</add> approved,<lb/>would the damp <add>thus</add> cast upon it be<lb/>condemned.  When <del>250,000</del> <add>£200,000 and more</add> of the public<lb/>money was to be spent before the smallest benefit<lb/>could be reaped the <del><gap/></del> situation was not grudged.<lb/>An <del>individual undertaker appears who</del> <add>offer is accepted which</add> begins<lb/>with <del>my</del> easing the nation of this load in the first<lb/>instance, to say nothing of <del>the <!-- brackets in pencil -->[money]</del> <add>what</add> other advantages<lb/><del>which distinguish</del> <add><sic>concurr</sic> in distinguishing</add> the new plan from the old<lb/><del>one</del>, and now the situation is too good. <del><unclear>an one</unclear></del> The<lb/><add><del>The</del> Supervisors</add></p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:24, 7 May 2021

Click Here To Edit


6
Reasons Panopticon Bill Choice

and the choice of the present situation pitched upon confirmed in preference
to that prior choice, as being unexceptionable on
every point, will on that ground/on this point as on any other and but more particularly on this.

Nor would Administration itself be less exposed
to obloquy from so a change. Why turn aside by such a change. — What is What could have turned him
it that could thus have turned them aside (it would be said) from the line already marked
out by impartial justice? — What but the overweening
influence of powerful individuals? The After a three
years search, the best possible situation had been found out by
the most competent authority: but an Archbishop
and an Earl stood in the way, and so a less
eligible fit one was to be looked out for. The Villas The Villas
of of Ministers too had have their Vilas that way: and
they did not choose to have their road darkened
by such objects [+] In the measure to be postponed [+] In the plan to be postponed
[+] till a situation
can be found for it
which is not within
the ride of a Minister
or a Lord? Its
execution then is
not likely in a hurry to be very
speedy. — To all Would the
new controuling body,
would the Judges, accept so much as
of listen to any such an instruction?
If not,
it may the changeing
may be from the drying pan
to the fire.

In proportion too as the new plan was generally approved,
would the damp thus cast upon it be
condemned. When 250,000 £200,000 and more of the public
money was to be spent before the smallest benefit
could be reaped the situation was not grudged.
An individual undertaker appears who offer is accepted which begins
with my easing the nation of this load in the first
instance, to say nothing of the [money] what other advantages
which distinguish concurr in distinguishing the new plan from the old
one, and now the situation is too good. an one The
The Supervisors



Identifier: | JB/124/034/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 124.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

124

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

034

Info in main headings field

panopticon bill choice

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d5 / d6 / d7 / d8

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

41723

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in