JB/052/237/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/052/237/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1825. April 18<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <!-- some in pencil --> >p><note>1<lb/><sic>Ch.</sic> IX</note><lb/>4 <note>&sect;.</note></p> <p><note>8 continued</note></p> <p>But, in so far as <del>it i</del> he is in the right he <del><gap/></del> <add>stands</add> exposed by<lb/>it equally with the pursuer to sufferance to the prejudice<lb/>of the direct ends of justice, by deprivation and deterioration<lb/>of evidence as above: and proportioned to his assurance<lb/>of his being in the right is the vexation his <add>resulting</add> experiences<lb/>from the apprehension of being ultimately regarded as being<lb/>in the wrong, and on that account <gap/> subjected to the<lb/>service <del>demanded and</del> which though not due is demanded<lb/>at his charge.</p> <p>9<lb/>Unavoidable delay<lb/>where several applications<lb/>made at the same<lb/>time</note></p> <p><sic>Art.</sic> But of two <add>or more</add> applications made at the<lb/><del>same any one but may by the <gap/> it makes in the<lb/>the Judges time produce of necessity, a delay in respect of<lb/>the performance of the judicial operation requisite for the rendering<lb/>of justice</del><lb/> same time no one is then which may not of necessity<lb/>be made to <gap/> delay by the <del>operations</del> <add>just </add> demands <del>produced</del> <add> made</add><lb/>by others in an indefinite number upon the Judges time</p> <p><note>10<lb/>where delay in the<lb/>natural order<lb/>may be productive<lb/>of preponderant<lb/>advantage to the ends<lb/>of justice</note></p> <p><sic>Art.</sic> what may also happen is that by<lb/>deferring that which in the natural order <add>course</add> of the inquiry would be<lb/>the next judicial; operation to be performed service <add>may be produced</add> preponderating<lb/>over the difference to any or all the ends of justice<lb/>As often as this is the case the Judge will accordingly defer<lb?>to some <gap/> then indicated the performance of <gap/><lb/><gap/> judicial service: but, for reason and justification, he<lb/>will bring to view the particular individual or individuals by<lb/>which exception has appeared to be made to the general<lb/>rule.</p> <p>&#9758; <foreign>Quere</foreign> whether to give examples of such demand for delay?</p>  
<head>1825. April 18<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <!-- some in pencil --> <p><note>1<lb/><sic>Ch.</sic> IX</note><lb/>4 <note>&sect;. General Rules</note></p> <p><note>8 continued</note></p> <p>But, in so far as <del>it i</del> he is in the right he <del><gap/></del> <add>stands</add> exposed by<lb/>it equally with the pursuer to sufferance to the prejudice<lb/>of the direct ends of justice, by deprivation and deterioration<lb/>of evidence as above: and proportioned to his assurance<lb/>of his being in the right is the vexation his <add>resulting</add> experiences<lb/>from the apprehension of being ultimately regarded as being<lb/>in the wrong, and on that account unduly subjected to the<lb/>service <del>demanded and</del> which though not due is demanded<lb/>at his charge.</p> <p><note>9<lb/>Unavoidable delay<lb/>where several applications<lb/>made at the same<lb/>time</note></p> <p><sic>Art.</sic> But of two <add>or more</add> applications made at the<lb/><del>same any one but may by the <gap/> it creates in the<lb/>the Judges time produces of necessity, a delay in respect of<lb/>the performance of the judicial operation requisite for the rendering<lb/>of justice</del><lb/>same time no one is there which may not of necessity<lb/>be made to suffer delay by the <del>operations</del> <add>just </add> demands <del>produced</del> <add> made</add><lb/>by others in an indefinite number upon the Judges time</p> <p><note>10<lb/>Where delay in the<lb/>natural order<lb/>may be productive<lb/>of preponderant<lb/>advantage to the ends<lb/>of justice</note></p> <p><sic>Art.</sic> What may also happen is &#x2014; that by<lb/>deferring that which in the natural order <add>course</add> of the inquiry would be<lb/>the next judicial operation to be performed service <add>may be produced</add> preponderating<lb/>over the difference to any or all the ends of justice<lb/>As often as this is the case the Judge will accordingly defer<lb/>to some future time indicated the performance of such<lb/>said judicial service: but, for reason and justification, he<lb/>will bring to view the particular individual or individuals by<lb/>which exception has appeared to be made to the general<lb/>rule.</p> <p>&#9758; <foreign>Quere</foreign> whether to give examples of such demand for delay?</p>  






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 15:21, 2 July 2021

Click Here To Edit

1825. April 18
Procedure Code

1
Ch. IX

4 §. General Rules

8 continued

But, in so far as it i he is in the right he stands exposed by
it equally with the pursuer to sufferance to the prejudice
of the direct ends of justice, by deprivation and deterioration
of evidence as above: and proportioned to his assurance
of his being in the right is the vexation his resulting experiences
from the apprehension of being ultimately regarded as being
in the wrong, and on that account unduly subjected to the
service demanded and which though not due is demanded
at his charge.

9
Unavoidable delay
where several applications
made at the same
time

Art. But of two or more applications made at the
same any one but may by the it creates in the
the Judges time produces of necessity, a delay in respect of
the performance of the judicial operation requisite for the rendering
of justice

same time no one is there which may not of necessity
be made to suffer delay by the operations just demands produced made
by others in an indefinite number upon the Judges time

10
Where delay in the
natural order
may be productive
of preponderant
advantage to the ends
of justice

Art. What may also happen is — that by
deferring that which in the natural order course of the inquiry would be
the next judicial operation to be performed service may be produced preponderating
over the difference to any or all the ends of justice
As often as this is the case the Judge will accordingly defer
to some future time indicated the performance of such
said judicial service: but, for reason and justification, he
will bring to view the particular individual or individuals by
which exception has appeared to be made to the general
rule.

Quere whether to give examples of such demand for delay?




Identifier: | JB/052/237/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.

Date_1

1825-04-18

Marginal Summary Numbering

9-10

Box

052

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

237

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16910

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in