JB/097/006/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/097/006/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/097/006/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/097/006/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>OBSTACLES. PREJUGÉS PROFESS<hi rend='superscript'>L</hi> &#x2014; Law good or bad?</head>
 
<p>I shall not reject any of those <add>frequent occasions</add> opportunities that<lb/>
will occur of pointing out the imperfections both<lb/>
in theory and in <sic>practise</sic> of our ancient Law <add>and those who executed it</add><lb/>
<note>[tis from a first <add>accurate</add> observation of those imperfections that we are taught that lesson which some are so unwilling to learn, how much reason we have to be pleased <add>satisfied</add> with those amongst whom &amp; under whom we live.]</note> [<add><sic>it's</sic> executors and professors</add> tis from an accurate view of the inconveniences<lb/>
of each preceding period that we discover how<lb/>
much reason we have to be pleased with those<lb/>
with whom and under whom we live.]</p>
 
<p>I <del>cannot so well</del> <add>am not so sensible</add> of the use of that <add>profound</add> mysterious<lb/>
reverence for antiquity which writers upon this<lb/>
subject in particular are so prone to entertain<lb/>
and so studious to inculcate <add>propagate</add>.</p>
 
<head>English Jurisprudence</head>
 
<p>Is our System of Criminal Law a good one?<lb/>
Yes and no. Yes, if compared with <del>that of</del> <add>itself</add><lb/>
in former <add>preceding</add> ages. Yes, if compared with that<lb/>
of other nations in all ages <add>which come nearest to a competition</add> <note>there are two sorts of persons who shelter themselves under this error; those</note> even by the confession<lb/>
of those nations themselves</p>
 
<p>No if compared with our Idea<hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note>+ I speak not of visionary but of attainable perfection.</note> [of attainable <add>such as is <hi rend='superscript'>3 4 5</hi></add><lb/>
excellence <hi rend='superscript'>2</hi>]</p>
 
<p>Thus it happens in this as in so many other<lb/>
cases <note><add>of</add> The Law is so <hi rend='superscript'>1</hi> uninviting <hi rend='superscript'>2</hi> a study, that the people <sic>chuse</sic>  <add>a better intent</add> rather to give credit to <add>the</add> its <add>pictures of it</add> <del>Professors for that</del> high excellency <add>made by <sic>it's</sic> Professors</add> which they arrogate to it than to be at the price of examining their foundation <add><sic>it's</sic> <gap/></add></note> good <add>[meaning here nothing absolutely positive, but being]</add> being a term of comparison, that<lb/>
two men with the same Sentiments may use different<lb/>
languages concerning it, owing to their assuming<lb/>
different standards of [that] comparison &#x2014;<lb/>
neither is a [single] writer therefore inconsistent who<lb/>
in one minute <add>be found exulting</add> exult in the excellence of the same<lb/>
System <add>and</add> when in the next he deplores <sic>it's</sic> imperfection.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:12, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

OBSTACLES. PREJUGÉS PROFESSL — Law good or bad?

I shall not reject any of those frequent occasions opportunities that
will occur of pointing out the imperfections both
in theory and in practise of our ancient Law and those who executed it
[tis from a first accurate observation of those imperfections that we are taught that lesson which some are so unwilling to learn, how much reason we have to be pleased satisfied with those amongst whom & under whom we live.] [it's executors and professors tis from an accurate view of the inconveniences
of each preceding period that we discover how
much reason we have to be pleased with those
with whom and under whom we live.]

I cannot so well am not so sensible of the use of that profound mysterious
reverence for antiquity which writers upon this
subject in particular are so prone to entertain
and so studious to inculcate propagate.

English Jurisprudence

Is our System of Criminal Law a good one?
Yes and no. Yes, if compared with that of itself
in former preceding ages. Yes, if compared with that
of other nations in all ages which come nearest to a competition there are two sorts of persons who shelter themselves under this error; those even by the confession
of those nations themselves

No if compared with our Idea+ + I speak not of visionary but of attainable perfection. [of attainable such as is 3 4 5
excellence 2]

Thus it happens in this as in so many other
cases of The Law is so 1 uninviting 2 a study, that the people chuse a better intent rather to give credit to the its pictures of it Professors for that high excellency made by it's Professors which they arrogate to it than to be at the price of examining their foundation it's good [meaning here nothing absolutely positive, but being] being a term of comparison, that
two men with the same Sentiments may use different
languages concerning it, owing to their assuming
different standards of [that] comparison —
neither is a [single] writer therefore inconsistent who
in one minute be found exulting exult in the excellence of the same
System and when in the next he deplores it's imperfection.




Identifier: | JB/097/006/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 97.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

097

Main Headings

Folio number

006

Info in main headings field

obstacles prejuges professl - law good or bad?

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::pro patria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31390

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in