JB/097/017/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/097/017/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>3</head>
<head>OBSTACLES PREJUDICES <unclear>Profess:<hi rend="superscript">t</hi></unclear> of DIVINES</head>


<p>It is in the means which they assign for the obtainment<lb/>
of their end that the diversity is manifested: <add>becomes</add><lb/>
manifest<del>ed</del> &amp; the contemplation of which could alone<lb/>
have suggested to them the imagining of a<lb/>
difference.</p>


<p>Were I to be asked what difference I conceive<lb/>
to be between them, <del>as there</del> stated; <add>as above</add> I should<lb/>
answer, none at all: so truly none at all,<lb/>
that if one could not say there were none at<lb/>
all with <add>rigid</add> logical truth, one might at least<lb/>
act <add>to the world's end</add> as if there were none at all, without<lb/>
any Ethical inconvenience. <sic>some</sic> colour of<lb/>
difference perhaps <add>there may be</add> with regard to conception<lb/>
tho' <add><unclear>there was</unclear></add> none at all with regard to reality; as<lb/>
man may conceive <add>an <add>Ideal</add> mental separation</add> to things as not being<lb/>
together which never are to be seen asunder: <note>As length &amp; breadth.<lb/>
The same difference as between <gap/> &amp; Lancaster.<lb/></note><lb/>
But so it is not with the Divines I mention<lb/>
They set those ends at variance: [as] assigning<lb/>
<del>ends</del> <add>as means</add> to the latter those things which manifestly<lb/></p>
<pb/>
<head>4</head>
<p>are not so to the former, there they begin the<lb/>
rupture. The means to their end as they call<lb/>
it, <del>tho' it ought</del> that which <add>by every <unclear>title</unclear> &amp; every obligation</add> is <sic>every body's</sic> as well as <sic>their's</sic>, are<lb/>
certain things at all events to be believed, &amp; contain<lb/>
others to be done, for which no one was<lb/>
ever or can ever <unclear>be</unclear> the better&#x2014; the Statesman's<lb/>
no longer identified with their's (for in compliance<lb/>
to custom I will call it their's) is with them<lb/>
at best only collateral, &amp; often contrary:<lb/>
From this moment not the Statesman's <sic>practises</sic><lb/>
but their <del><unclear><sic>paradims</sic></unclear></del> doctrines become the nuisance.<lb/>
You shall see them confess, because their heads <add>they are contrary</add><lb/>
are turned, or because it is too manifest to<lb/>
deny, that<lb/>
<note>The Statesman's end must yield any thing that <gap/><gap/> it <gap/> be <gap/>.</note></p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:12, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

3 OBSTACLES PREJUDICES Profess:t of DIVINES

It is in the means which they assign for the obtainment
of their end that the diversity is manifested: becomes
manifested & the contemplation of which could alone
have suggested to them the imagining of a
difference.

Were I to be asked what difference I conceive
to be between them, as there stated; as above I should
answer, none at all: so truly none at all,
that if one could not say there were none at
all with rigid logical truth, one might at least
act to the world's end as if there were none at all, without
any Ethical inconvenience. some colour of
difference perhaps there may be with regard to conception
tho' there was none at all with regard to reality; as
man may conceive an <add>Ideal mental separation</add> to things as not being
together which never are to be seen asunder: As length & breadth.
The same difference as between & Lancaster.

But so it is not with the Divines I mention
They set those ends at variance: [as] assigning
ends as means to the latter those things which manifestly


---page break---
4

are not so to the former, there they begin the
rupture. The means to their end as they call
it, tho' it ought that which by every title & every obligation is every body's as well as their's, are
certain things at all events to be believed, & contain
others to be done, for which no one was
ever or can ever be the better— the Statesman's
no longer identified with their's (for in compliance
to custom I will call it their's) is with them
at best only collateral, & often contrary:
From this moment not the Statesman's practises
but their paradims doctrines become the nuisance.
You shall see them confess, because their heads they are contrary
are turned, or because it is too manifest to
deny, that
The Statesman's end must yield any thing that it be .



Identifier: | JB/097/017/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 97.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

097

Main Headings

Folio number

017

Info in main headings field

obstacles prejuges professl of divines

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f3 / f4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::pro patria [britannia with lion motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31401

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in