JB/159/233/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/159/233/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/159/233/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/233/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/233/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>13</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><head>Capital Punishment examined.</head></p>
 
<p>With respect to this <add>the</add> pain of apprehension it will<lb/>
 
[here] occur that it <add>this</add> is no more than what is super-added<lb/>
 
to every other kind of <add>corporal</add> punishment;  so that if<lb/>
the real suffering <del>is equal to or negative (as</del> <add>is attendant on capital punishment</add>
<del>considered) in other accounts</del> <add>inferior to every other kind of <del>other</del> punishment</add>, it will still continue<lb/>
so [on this.]  when <add>after</add> this is <add>has been</add> taken into the account.  But<lb/>
we have already shewn that the <del>proportion</del> ratio<lb/>
of the expected suffering to the eventual <add>in death capital punishment</add> is much greater<lb/>
than in any other kind of punishment.  But<lb/>
<del>that</del> whether it be in general <hi rend="underline">so</hi> great as that, added<lb/>
to the <del><gap/> pain attending</del> organic part of the<lb/>
punishment (which is <add>we have seen to be</add> next to nothing) it is<lb/>
greater than the highest of all other punishments<lb/>
added to the pain of apprehension grounded <add>[which belongs to it]</add> on<lb/>
such <add>that</add> other punishment, is not very easy to determine.<lb/>
The essential part however is to determine the <add>relative</add> quantity<lb/>
of it as it appears <add>is likely</add> to bystanders, rather than<lb/>
as it subsists in the person of one who has already<lb/>
incurred the penalty.  For the mischief of the<lb/>
real punishment extends but a little way <add>has but a small extent</add> over <add>through</add><lb/>
the community, in proportion to the benefit of<lb/>
the apparent.  We see already <add>reason enough to conclude</add> that the former is<lb/>
not of such magnitude as to constitute <add>of itself</add> any very formidable<lb/>
objection to this mode of punishment.</p>
<p>In order to draw this comparison, it will abridge<lb/>
the business if <add>among other punishments</add> we select at once that which <del>fro</del><lb/>
<add>seems</add></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 11:01, 23 August 2021

Click Here To Edit

13

Capital Punishment examined.

With respect to this the pain of apprehension it will
[here] occur that it this is no more than what is super-added
to every other kind of corporal punishment; so that if
the real suffering is equal to or negative (as is attendant on capital punishment considered) in other accounts inferior to every other kind of other punishment, it will still continue
so [on this.] when after this is has been taken into the account. But
we have already shewn that the proportion ratio
of the expected suffering to the eventual in death capital punishment is much greater
than in any other kind of punishment. But
that whether it be in general so great as that, added
to the pain attending organic part of the
punishment (which is we have seen to be next to nothing) it is
greater than the highest of all other punishments
added to the pain of apprehension grounded [which belongs to it] on
such that other punishment, is not very easy to determine.
The essential part however is to determine the relative quantity
of it as it appears is likely to bystanders, rather than
as it subsists in the person of one who has already
incurred the penalty. For the mischief of the
real punishment extends but a little way has but a small extent over through
the community, in proportion to the benefit of
the apparent. We see already reason enough to conclude that the former is
not of such magnitude as to constitute of itself any very formidable
objection to this mode of punishment.

In order to draw this comparison, it will abridge
the business if among other punishments we select at once that which fro
seems


Identifier: | JB/159/233/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 159.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

159

Main Headings

punishment

Folio number

233

Info in main headings field

capital punishment examined

Image

001

Titles

exemplarity

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f13 / f14 / f15 / f16

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

caroline vernon

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

54056

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in