JB/159/142/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/159/142/003: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/159/142/003": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/142/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/142/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>27</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><head>Popularity.</head></p>
Popularity.<lb/>&#x2014;From p.26
<p>From p.21</p>
From p.2,<lb/>
<p>In p.185. A Law is considered without further<lb/>
In p.185. A Law is considered without further<lb/>
ceremony, for being "contrary to the natural impulse of<lb/>
ceremony, for being "contrary to the natural impulse of<lb/>
"self-preservation."<lb/>
"self-preservation."</p>
<del>The fear</del> <del>One of the principles have laid down for judges</del> A fundamental principle then<lb/>
<p><del>The firs  One of the principles here laid down for judging</del> <add>A fundamental principle then</add><lb/>
relative to <lb/>
<del>of the</del> <add>relative to</add> penal laws, is that there should be no penal<lb/>
<del>of the</del> formal laws, is that there should be no formal <lb/>
Laws.</p>
Laws.<lb/>
<p><del>This</del> Here the censure against afflictive  Death <del>is</del> <add>though</add> peremptory<lb/>  
&#x2014;&#x2014;&#x2014;&#x2014;&#x2014;<lb/>
is <unclear>calm</unclear>. In the next page <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">+</hi> p.23</note> he takes fare, and will<lb/>  
<unclear>Here the censure against <unclear>. Death <hi rend="superscript">though</hi>perempto<lb/>'
not bear to hear of it. Shall we plant thorns, says <lb/>
-ry is eaten. In the next page <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> he <<gap/> fare, and well <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> p.23<lb/>
he, in the path of Misery? God forbid! Such refinements<lb/>
not bear to hear of it. Shall we plant thorns, says <lb/>
"of inhumanity are admissible only in governments<lb/>
he, in the path of Misery? God forbid! Such refine-<lb/>
"so abominable in their constitution, as to<lb/>
-ments of inhumanity are admi<gap/> only in govern-<lb/>
"make the mere loss of life desirable."</p>
ments so abominable in their constitution, as to<lb/>
<p>Objections like these<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript"></hi> which consist in the mere expression of dislike without any reason for it</note>, I refer to the head of Popularity,<lb/>  
"make the more loss of life desirable."<lb/>
(because they contain nothing in themselves),<lb/>
&#x2014;&#x2014;&#x2014;&#x2014;<lb/>
because they add no weight to the scale beyond that<lb/>  
Objections like these, + I refer to the head of <unclear> - <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> which consist within <lb/>
of a rough suffrage, because they are such as<lb/>  
more <unclear> of his <lb/>
<del>any</del> <add>the bulk</add> of the people are apt to make, such as <del>the</del><lb/>  
like without any <lb/>
any of the people may <del>be</del> <add>are qualified to</add> make, the most respectable<lb/>
reason for it
<add>objectors</add> being no otherwise distinguishable from the least respectable<lb/>
 
of those that urge them, than by some <add>a greater or less degree of</add> superiority<lb/>
 
in point of energy and elegance, [than by<lb/>
the greater degree of energy and elegance with which<lb/>
 
they colour their single vote, to make it answer the <add>wear the</add><lb/>
 
purpose <add>semblance</add> of an argument.</p>
   
 
 
 
 
 
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 14:51, 25 August 2021

Click Here To Edit

27

Popularity.

From p.21

In p.185. A Law is considered without further
ceremony, for being "contrary to the natural impulse of
"self-preservation."

The firs One of the principles here laid down for judging A fundamental principle then
of the relative to penal laws, is that there should be no penal
Laws.

This Here the censure against afflictive Death is though peremptory
is calm. In the next page + + p.23 he takes fare, and will
not bear to hear of it. Shall we plant thorns, says
he, in the path of Misery? God forbid! Such refinements
"of inhumanity are admissible only in governments
"so abominable in their constitution, as to
"make the mere loss of life desirable."

Objections like these which consist in the mere expression of dislike without any reason for it, I refer to the head of Popularity,
(because they contain nothing in themselves),
because they add no weight to the scale beyond that
of a rough suffrage, because they are such as
any the bulk of the people are apt to make, such as the
any of the people may be are qualified to make, the most respectable
objectors being no otherwise distinguishable from the least respectable
of those that urge them, than by some a greater or less degree of superiority
in point of energy and elegance, [than by
the greater degree of energy and elegance with which
they colour their single vote, to make it answer the wear the
purpose semblance of an argument.


Identifier: | JB/159/142/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 159.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

159

Main Headings

punishment

Folio number

142

Info in main headings field

popularity

Image

003

Titles

note / humanity

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f25 / f26 / f27 / f28

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

caroline vernon

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

53965

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in