JB/052/311/001

Click Here To Edit

18278 Novr. Jany 22
Procedure Penal Code

5
Ch. Application
(2 §. Quarrel termination
existing System
limitations. Courts Danish

9
Danish conciliatory courts
simplicity though with
a host of disadvantages

By the so simple an arrangement as that of the
judicial meeting of the parties In Denmark under the Judicatory called
Reconciliation Courts two thirds in the judicial district in
question from two thirds to three fourths were struck out
of the list number of the cases suits carried before the judicatory
acting under the technical system. This under a host of
disadvantages, of one of which the bare mention may will be seen
to render unnecessary all mention of the rest. No power had
that judicatory to give execution and effect to its own decrees!

10
Notwithstanding these
disadvantages benefits
derived from these courts

If under such disadvantage success was thus extra
sure what may it not be requisite to be under a judiciary
made procedure system possessing in a degree so high above
every thing as yet exemplified the power as well as the
inducement to discover and ascertain what on each occasion
ought to be done, and the po when ascertained
the power of causing it to be done?

11
By common law counter-demands
restricted
within as narrow
limits as could be done

To receive in no case a counterdemand as
a set off to a claimant would have been on the part of the Common Law Court an injustice too
be endurable. What was to render the field of the
applicant as limited as possible was deemed advisable as limited, and thence
as indeterminate. For thereupon comes the poor question. whether
in the case of the demand in question, a counterdemand f to
the object in question should be. But, unless it was b
on account of the delay with which the proof of character of
the evidence in support of the counterdemand would be extended,
if in any one case a counterdemand is allowed,
b why not in every other.

Identifier: | JB/052/311/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.
Date_1	1828-01-22	Marginal Summary Numbering	9-11
Box	052	Main Headings	penal code; procedure code
Folio number	311	Info in main headings field	procedure penal code
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	d5 / e2
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	j whatman turkey mill 1827
Marginals	george bentham	Paper Producer	jonathan blenman
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1827
Notes public		ID Number	16984
Box Contents