JB/149/225/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/149/225/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/149/225/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/149/225/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/149/225/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>2</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><add>inclined</add><lb/>
 
to demand that opinion which would<lb/>
 
only be removed a step by the intervention<lb/>
 
of this new jurisdiction.  They would<lb/>
have an additional judge to give his<lb/>
opinion upon the case in its progress<lb/>
but the final decision would be<lb/>
more distant than ever.  Such a plan,<lb/>
he was convinced, was least of all<lb/>
calculated to get rid of the difficulty –<lb/>
or <add>to</add> promote the object, in view –<lb/>
namely – the obtaining with facility<lb/>
and expedition the final hearing and<lb/>
decree of the Chancellor. <del>his <gap/></del> In<lb/>
his opinion the dispatch of business in<lb/>
the Court of Chancery depended very<lb/>
much on the Chancellor himself.  If<lb/>
the Chancellor was of a constitution of<lb/>
mind that led to quick decision the<lb/>
business of the Court would be done –<lb/>
if he did not possess that important<lb/>
qualification <del>in a Judge</del> the business<lb/>
would necessarily fall into arrear.<lb/>
Whether the present Chancellor was<lb/>
of that constitution of mind that<lb/>
led to prompt decision he would<lb/>
leave to others to determine – but he<lb/>
confessed he should like to see a</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:51, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

2

inclined
to demand that opinion which would
only be removed a step by the intervention
of this new jurisdiction. They would
have an additional judge to give his
opinion upon the case in its progress
but the final decision would be
more distant than ever. Such a plan,
he was convinced, was least of all
calculated to get rid of the difficulty –
or to promote the object, in view –
namely – the obtaining with facility
and expedition the final hearing and
decree of the Chancellor. his In
his opinion the dispatch of business in
the Court of Chancery depended very
much on the Chancellor himself. If
the Chancellor was of a constitution of
mind that led to quick decision the
business of the Court would be done –
if he did not possess that important
qualification in a Judge the business
would necessarily fall into arrear.
Whether the present Chancellor was
of that constitution of mind that
led to prompt decision he would
leave to others to determine – but he
confessed he should like to see a


Identifier: | JB/149/225/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 149.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

149

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

225

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2 / / /

Penner

Watermarks

iping 1810

Marginals

Paper Producer

bernardino rivadavia

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1810

Notes public

ID Number

50079

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in