★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
Auto approved |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1827. <sic>Aug<hi rend="superscript">t</hi>.</sic> 11<lb/>Penal or Procedure <del>Constitutional</del>Code</head> <p>2<lb/><note><sic>Ch.</sic> <foreign>Prefat</foreign></note><lb/>(1) (2 <note>§. </note></p> <p>☞ <del>In the <unclear>next</unclear> purported <gap/> to ask<lb/>To a | <head>1827. <sic>Aug<hi rend="superscript">t</hi>.</sic> 11<lb/>Penal or Procedure <del>Constitutional</del>Code</head> <p>2<lb/><note><sic>Ch.</sic> <foreign>Prefat</foreign></note><lb/>(1) (2 <note>§. </note></p> <p>☞ <del>In the <unclear>next</unclear> purported <gap/> to ask<lb/>To a man What was so <gap/> <gap/><lb/>reprisal to a man to whom the <gap/></del> <add><gap/> <gap/> a reward <gap/></add><lb/>The <gap/> rewards<lb/>boundless</p> <!-- to the right of the text --><p><gap/>:| <add>Do |</add> if they were left in the<lb/><gap/> <gap/>.<lb/>But individually and collectively<lb/>they are objects of indefatigable eulogy</p> <!-- pencil text overwritten --><p><note>3<lb/>Objection 2. Such high<lb/>situations no fit objects<lb/>for obloquy</note></p> <p>Men in the highest situation the country affords men<lb/>who tell <add>now</add> of <unclear>late</unclear> have been <add>all of them vibrant excesses</add> objects of utmost immoral<lb/>veneration <add>reverence</add> and admiration. There in page after pages<lb/>there in volume after volumes — that they should be <sic>droppt</sic><lb/>as it were through the <gap/>-ground with scorn and <sic>ignomity</sic>?<lb/>Such language <add>testament</add> is it defensible? such language<lb/>is it endurable.</p> <p><note>4<lb/>Answer 1. Better than<lb/>a low one</note></p> <p>Yes: to measurably and preponderantly beneficial<lb/>end every thing imaginable is not only endurable but<lb/>definable: <add>yes: and</add> the omission of it indefensible</p> <p>And the regret of which these questions are the expression —<lb/>where is the reasonableness of it? What the cause of it<lb/><gap/> <add>A <gap/> by choice</add> by the worst of whom not a thousandth part has<lb/>been produced of the suffering produced by the least <unclear>bred</unclear> of <unclear>them</unclear><lb/>favourite of fortune. Where is the lawyer who for a <unclear>prisoner</unclear><lb/>would scruple to pour forth upon him <unclear>thus</unclear>, and could he<lb/>find it worse?</p> <p>Men who though not in orders, have in wealth<lb/>so much more comfortable a cloak to wrap themselves in<lb/>men who each of them beholds in every other <del>under</del> the<lb/><del><gap/></del> an accomplice and in every one connected with him<lb/>a supporter <add>support</add> <del>are there</del> is it by men thus circumstanced<lb/>that all sympathy. Then are they seen to be sided with<lb/>and defended defended without staying to enquire why <add>on what grounds</add>? defended<lb/>for no other <del><gap/></del> reason than because they are<lb/>attacked?</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1827. Augt. 11
Penal or Procedure ConstitutionalCode
2
Ch. Prefat
(1) (2 §.
☞ In the next purported to ask
To a man What was so
reprisal to a man to whom the a reward
The rewards
boundless
:| Do | if they were left in the
.
But individually and collectively
they are objects of indefatigable eulogy
3
Objection 2. Such high
situations no fit objects
for obloquy
Men in the highest situation the country affords men
who tell now of late have been all of them vibrant excesses objects of utmost immoral
veneration reverence and admiration. There in page after pages
there in volume after volumes — that they should be droppt
as it were through the -ground with scorn and ignomity?
Such language testament is it defensible? such language
is it endurable.
4
Answer 1. Better than
a low one
Yes: to measurably and preponderantly beneficial
end every thing imaginable is not only endurable but
definable: yes: and the omission of it indefensible
And the regret of which these questions are the expression —
where is the reasonableness of it? What the cause of it
A by choice by the worst of whom not a thousandth part has
been produced of the suffering produced by the least bred of them
favourite of fortune. Where is the lawyer who for a prisoner
would scruple to pour forth upon him thus, and could he
find it worse?
Men who though not in orders, have in wealth
so much more comfortable a cloak to wrap themselves in
men who each of them beholds in every other under the
an accomplice and in every one connected with him
a supporter support are there is it by men thus circumstanced
that all sympathy. Then are they seen to be sided with
and defended defended without staying to enquire why on what grounds? defended
for no other reason than because they are
attacked?
|
Identifier: | JB/052/159/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1827-08-11 |
3-4 |
||
|
052 |
constitutional code; penal code; procedure code |
||
|
159 |
penal or procedure code |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c1 / d2 / e2 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1826 |
||
|
jonathan blenman |
|||
|
1826 |
|||
|
16832 |
|||
