★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
m Protected "JB/004/074/005": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/004/074/005|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/004/074/005|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>Extract from "Annual Register" 1827 p.143.<lb/> | |||
<head>Brougham are Six Acts</head></p> | |||
<p>"Mr Hume, who had not joined in the<lb/> | |||
migration of his brethren to the ministerial<lb/> | |||
benches, brought forward (31st May) a motion<lb/> | |||
for the repeal of this State" (the Sex Acts),<lb/> | |||
"which, with all the others, had received<lb/> | |||
the strenuous support of Mr Canning, & had<lb/> | |||
been resisted and condemned by the opposition<lb/> | |||
as a tyrannical and unwarrantable<lb/> | |||
attack against the liberty of the press,<lb/> | |||
and as a new attempt to crush the public<lb/> | |||
execration of him and <add>of</add> his compeers. Mr Hume<lb/> | |||
said, that he had intended to have made the same<lb/> | |||
motion during the preceding session; but he<lb/> | |||
now congratulated himself upon the delay, as the charges<lb/> | |||
which had in the interim taken place in the<lb/> | |||
government, must have made it a fortunate delay<lb/> | |||
for the question he now advocated. But Mr Hume<lb/> | |||
greatly deceived himself. Mr Tierney, Mr Abercrombie,<lb/> | |||
Sir James Mackintosh, and Mr Brougham, were absent<lb/> | |||
on the occasion: Lord Hilton declared it to be a matter<lb/> | |||
of so little moment, that he was not sure whether<lb/> | |||
he would remain in the House to the division;<lb/> | |||
Sir James Sear left and Sir Robert Wilson manfully<lb/> | |||
joined Mr Canning in resisting the motion,<lb/> | |||
and abusing and ridiculing their astonished mate,<lb/> | |||
the member for Aberdeen."</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
Extract from "Annual Register" 1827 p.143.
Brougham are Six Acts
"Mr Hume, who had not joined in the
migration of his brethren to the ministerial
benches, brought forward (31st May) a motion
for the repeal of this State" (the Sex Acts),
"which, with all the others, had received
the strenuous support of Mr Canning, & had
been resisted and condemned by the opposition
as a tyrannical and unwarrantable
attack against the liberty of the press,
and as a new attempt to crush the public
execration of him and of his compeers. Mr Hume
said, that he had intended to have made the same
motion during the preceding session; but he
now congratulated himself upon the delay, as the charges
which had in the interim taken place in the
government, must have made it a fortunate delay
for the question he now advocated. But Mr Hume
greatly deceived himself. Mr Tierney, Mr Abercrombie,
Sir James Mackintosh, and Mr Brougham, were absent
on the occasion: Lord Hilton declared it to be a matter
of so little moment, that he was not sure whether
he would remain in the House to the division;
Sir James Sear left and Sir Robert Wilson manfully
joined Mr Canning in resisting the motion,
and abusing and ridiculing their astonished mate,
the member for Aberdeen."
|
Identifier: | JB/004/074/005"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 4. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1830-07-17 |
|||
|
004 |
lord brougham displayed |
||
|
074a"a" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 74. |
review table shewing the relation of brougham's topics to bentham's |
||
|
005 |
|||
|
rudiments sheet (brouillon) |
2 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham |
b&m 1829 |
||
|
arthur moore; richard doane |
|||
|
1829 |
|||
|
1995 |
|||
