★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
m Protected "JB/052/497/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
Auto approved |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1824. <sic>Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>.</sic> 5<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <!-- some in pencil --> <p><note>2<hi rend="superscript">o</hi><lb/><sic>Ch.</sic> Means of execution</note><lb/>(4) <note>§. 3 Occasion of | <head>1824. <sic>Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>.</sic> 5<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <!-- some in pencil --> <p><note>2<hi rend="superscript">o</hi><lb/><sic>Ch.</sic> Means of execution</note><lb/>(4) <note>§. 3 Occasion of <unclear>need as fit</unclear></note></p> <p>At the commencement of the <add>a</add> suit natural <sic>forthcomingness</sic><lb/>is necessary for one purpose, eventual forthcomingness <del>security<lb/>fo</del> <unclear>semi actual</unclear> security for it at another</p> <p>In so far as <del>th</del> the point of the individual in question<lb/><gap/> whether for testification or for any other purpose, <add>testification in the presence of the Judge is necessary</add>, <add>his/<del><unclear>actual</unclear></del></add> <sic>forthcomingness</sic><lb/>as necessary as actual <sic>forthcomingness</sic>: <del>where</del> in so far as such<lb/>testification is not/ necessary, actual <sic>forthcomingness</sic> may be<lb/>not necessary; eventual <sic>forthcomingness</sic> may be<lb/>not necessary; eventual <sic>forthcomingness</sic> and thence actual <add>present</add> security<lb/>for eventual <sic>forthcomingness</sic> may be sufficient.</p> <p>For thus obtaining and securing compliance respecting<lb/><sic>forthcomingness</sic> the means employable are either <add>such as</add> physical<lb/><del>operating</del> <add>operate</add> on the body or such as operate only in the mind<lb/>In the first case they may be stated <sic>prehensive,</sic> in the other case<lb/><sic>accersitive.</sic> To employ the <sic>prehensive</sic> means is to cause<lb/>the person in question to be <add><unclear>hand</unclear> <gap/> or</add> secured whosoever he is, and as<lb/>a thing immoveable might be, brought <del>before</del> <add>to</add> the place at which<lb/>the operation which <add>whatever it be</add> it is decreed to perform on him <foreign>statim</foreign><lb/>or may be performed: in the case here in question that of<lb/>causing him to speak <add>in relation</add> on the subject in question the proposed<lb/>subject of discourse</p> <p>Physical <add>Prehension</add> is always the most vexatious. Therefore<lb/>physical ought never to be employed but under the expectation<lb/>that <sic>accersition</sic> will not suffice</p> <p>To things <sic>prehensive</sic> are <add>is</add> the only one of the<lb/>two means which the nature of the case <sic>admitts</sic> of. But<lb/>the prehension may be performed either by the person in whose<lb/>custody they are or by the functionary by whom if performed<lb/>upon him the prehension would be performed</p> <p>Where things alone are the intended object of prehension<lb/>the proper <add>appropriate</add> instrument is therefore an instrument of <sic>accrersition</sic> <add>unless <del>rate</del> effective reluctance be apprehended</add><lb/>addressed to the person coupled with an instrument of <sic>mandation</sic><lb/>requiring him to <sic>prehend</sic> and <gap/> the thing.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
1824. Decr. 5
Procedure Code
2o
Ch. Means of execution
(4) §. 3 Occasion of need as fit
At the commencement of the a suit natural forthcomingness
is necessary for one purpose, eventual forthcomingness security
fo semi actual security for it at another
In so far as th the point of the individual in question
whether for testification or for any other purpose, testification in the presence of the Judge is necessary, his/actual forthcomingness
as necessary as actual forthcomingness: where in so far as such
testification is not/ necessary, actual forthcomingness may be
not necessary; eventual forthcomingness may be
not necessary; eventual forthcomingness and thence actual present security
for eventual forthcomingness may be sufficient.
For thus obtaining and securing compliance respecting
forthcomingness the means employable are either such as physical
operating operate on the body or such as operate only in the mind
In the first case they may be stated prehensive, in the other case
accersitive. To employ the prehensive means is to cause
the person in question to be hand or secured whosoever he is, and as
a thing immoveable might be, brought before to the place at which
the operation which whatever it be it is decreed to perform on him statim
or may be performed: in the case here in question that of
causing him to speak in relation on the subject in question the proposed
subject of discourse
Physical Prehension is always the most vexatious. Therefore
physical ought never to be employed but under the expectation
that accersition will not suffice
To things prehensive are is the only one of the
two means which the nature of the case admitts of. But
the prehension may be performed either by the person in whose
custody they are or by the functionary by whom if performed
upon him the prehension would be performed
Where things alone are the intended object of prehension
the proper appropriate instrument is therefore an instrument of accrersition unless rate effective reluctance be apprehended
addressed to the person coupled with an instrument of mandation
requiring him to prehend and the thing.
Identifier: | JB/052/497/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1824-12-05 |
|||
052 |
procedure code |
||
497 |
procedure code |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
c4 |
||
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1824 |
||
jonathan blenman |
|||
1824 |
|||
17170 |
|||