JB/118/172/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/118/172/002: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/118/172/002": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/118/172/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/118/172/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><add>On the inquiry</add> For the purpose of the course <add>proper</add> to be taken for giving<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
effect execution and effect to it, <del>the propriety</del> <add>viz.</add> by<lb/>
 
means of the adjective branch or law of procedure<lb/>
 
the <add>general</add> propriety of the substantive branch or main<lb/>
 
body of the law, is here, as on all occasions it<lb/>
can not but be assumed.  <del><gap/></del> Were it definitive<lb/>
the assumption could of course be irrational and<lb/>
absurd, contrary to all experience:  <add>but</add> being <add>but</add> no more<lb/>
than provisional, and made for no other purpose<lb/>
than <del>to avoid</del> that of avoiding to confound <add>peoples</add> import<lb/>
of the enquiry by considerations that belong<lb/>
not to that but to another, it is not only <add>is it</add> reasonable,<lb/>
but it is the opposite <unclear>course</unclear> that would be<lb/>
warrantable.</p>
<p>The substantive law is it bad <hi rend="underline">in toto</hi>? it is<lb/>
to this principal, and not to the subsidiary <add>branch</add> part<lb/>
that every thing in the way of objection and opposition<lb/>
ought to apply itself.</p>
<p>The substantive law is it bad in this or that<lb/>
particular part?  <del>Require</del> <add>Still</add> it is to the substantive<lb/>
law viz. to the <add>supposed</add> part in question that objection<lb/>
and opposition ought to apply as before.</p>
<p>In as far as the substantive law <add>in any part</add> appears objectionable,<lb/>
it is to that part and that alone that<lb/>
every thing in the way of objection and opposition<lb/>
ought <add>manifestly</add> to apply itself.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 14:44, 14 January 2022

Click Here To Edit

On the inquiry For the purpose of the course proper to be taken for giving
effect execution and effect to it, the propriety viz. by
means of the adjective branch or law of procedure
the general propriety of the substantive branch or main
body of the law, is here, as on all occasions it
can not but be assumed. Were it definitive
the assumption could of course be irrational and
absurd, contrary to all experience: but being but no more
than provisional, and made for no other purpose
than to avoid that of avoiding to confound peoples import
of the enquiry by considerations that belong
not to that but to another, it is not only is it reasonable,
but it is the opposite course that would be
warrantable.

The substantive law is it bad in toto? it is
to this principal, and not to the subsidiary branch part
that every thing in the way of objection and opposition
ought to apply itself.

The substantive law is it bad in this or that
particular part? Require Still it is to the substantive
law viz. to the supposed part in question that objection
and opposition ought to apply as before.

In as far as the substantive law in any part appears objectionable,
it is to that part and that alone that
every thing in the way of objection and opposition
ought manifestly to apply itself.


Identifier: | JB/118/172/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 118.

Date_1

1812-02-02

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

118

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

172

Info in main headings field

panopt. advertisement

Image

002

Titles

Category

advertisement

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

th 1806

Marginals

Paper Producer

andre morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

ID Number

39226

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in