★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
Auto approved |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Ch.VII Probation and Evidence<lb/> | Ch.VII Probation and Evidence<lb/> | ||
§.18. Character Evidence</note><lb/> | §.18. Character Evidence</note><lb/> | ||
<note>11<lb/ | <note>11<lb/>So as to number of<lb/> | ||
<del>wit</del>nesses imputing<lb/> | <del>wit</del>nesses imputing<lb/> | ||
mendacity to the primary<lb/> | mendacity to the primary<lb/> | ||
| Line 15: | Line 14: | ||
witnesses</note><lb/> | witnesses</note><lb/> | ||
<head>Ratiocinative</head> | <head>Ratiocinative</head> | ||
<unclear>Art. 11</unclear> 4. But if in the first instance no <add>well-grounded</add> limit<lb/> | <p><unclear>Art. 11</unclear> 4. But if in the first instance no <add>well-grounded</add> limit<lb/> | ||
could be put to the number of mendacity-imputing witnesses<lb/> | could be put to the number of mendacity-imputing witnesses<lb/> | ||
<unclear>as for</unclear> Art. 10 so neither could there be to the number<lb/> | |||
of mendacity-imputing witnesses whose evidence were | of mendacity-imputing witnesses whose evidence were demanded <lb/> | ||
for the purpose of imputing mendacity to any<lb/> | |||
<gap/> of the first one of mendacity-imputing witnesses <lb/> | <gap/> of the first one of mendacity-imputing witnesses <lb/> | ||
here then might be a second set, thence a third set and so<lb/> | here then might be a second set, thence a third set and so<lb/> | ||
on the number menacing in a geometrical ratio</p> | |||
<note>12<lb/> | <note>12<lb/> | ||
The effect would be<lb/> | The effect would be<lb/> | ||
| Line 31: | Line 30: | ||
<p>Art.12.5. To an assertion imputing habitual<lb/> | <p>Art.12.5. To an assertion imputing habitual<lb/> | ||
mendacity to a man to an assertion to this effect has<lb/> | mendacity to a man to an assertion to this effect has<lb/> | ||
<del>in<gap/></del> decidedly so ever | <del>in<gap/></del> decidedly so ever <unclear>mendacism</unclear>, no punishment<lb/> | ||
as for mendacity could be attached, useless ass<gap/>ation of<lb/> | as for mendacity could be attached, useless ass<gap/>ation of<lb/> | ||
individual acts of mendacity in having been <unclear> | individual acts of mendacity in having been <unclear>committed</unclear> on<lb/> | ||
so many individual occasions were removed. But to<lb/> | so many individual occasions were removed. But to<lb/> | ||
give acceptance to such <gap/>tions would be to | give acceptance to such ass<gap/>tions would be to untied.<lb/> | ||
in the bosom of this suit, the <del><gap/></del> procedures <add>in relation to </add> as are many<lb/> | in the bosom of this suit, the <del><gap/></del> procedures <add>in relation to </add> as are many<lb/> | ||
<del>of those</del> distinguishable such as those acts of mendacity<lb/> | <del>of those</del> distinguishable such as those acts of mendacity<lb/> | ||
so imputed: for <del>evidence <gap/> <gap/></del> as in other cases so<lb/> | so imputed: for <del>evidence <gap/> <gap/></del> as in other cases so<lb/> | ||
in this: if | in this: if <unclear>criminative</unclear> or inculpable evidence were received<lb/> | ||
how <gap/>ably with justice could excrimination or exculpable<lb/> | how <gap/>ably with justice could excrimination or exculpable<lb/> | ||
evidence be excluded?</p> | evidence be excluded?</p> | ||
| Line 47: | Line 46: | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
18287. Nov 2 Feb.2
Law Amendment.
Propositions.
Ch.VII Probation and Evidence
§.18. Character Evidence
11
So as to number of
witnesses imputing
mendacity to the primary
mendacity imputing
witnesses
Ratiocinative
Art. 11 4. But if in the first instance no well-grounded limit
could be put to the number of mendacity-imputing witnesses
as for Art. 10 so neither could there be to the number
of mendacity-imputing witnesses whose evidence were demanded
for the purpose of imputing mendacity to any
of the first one of mendacity-imputing witnesses
here then might be a second set, thence a third set and so
on the number menacing in a geometrical ratio
12
The effect would be
including in the bosom
of a suit a number of
distinct suits
Ratiocinative
Art.12.5. To an assertion imputing habitual
mendacity to a man to an assertion to this effect has
in decidedly so ever mendacism, no punishment
as for mendacity could be attached, useless assation of
individual acts of mendacity in having been committed on
so many individual occasions were removed. But to
give acceptance to such asstions would be to untied.
in the bosom of this suit, the procedures in relation to as are many
of those distinguishable such as those acts of mendacity
so imputed: for evidence as in other cases so
in this: if criminative or inculpable evidence were received
how ably with justice could excrimination or exculpable
evidence be excluded?
|
Identifier: | JB/052/373/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1828-02-02 |
11-12 |
||
|
052 |
|||
|
373 |
law amendment |
||
|
001 |
ratiocinative / ratiocinative |
||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d4 / e4 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1827 |
||
|
jonathan blenman |
|||
|
1827 |
|||
|
17046 |
|||
