JB/034/054/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/034/054/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/034/054/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/034/054/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/034/054/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1823. Sept<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi> 10.</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Constitutional Code</head>
 
<p>102.<lb/>
 
8.  Legal responsibility,<lb/>
 
none:  i.e. punibility &amp;<lb/>
dislocability, none.  Power<lb/>
over the fate of the suit,<lb/>
to a vast extent, absolute:<lb/>
on condition of self annoyance<lb/>
to a certain<lb/>
extent, this power in the<lb/>
hands of any one, and he<lb/>
irresponsible.  To the most<lb/>
mischievous, no less than<lb/>
the most beneficial purpose<lb/>
is this power applicable.<lb/>
&#9758; Note dislocability of<lb/>
Guinea-men, by King.</p>
<p>103.<lb/>
Effects producible by this<lb/>
despotism.<lb/>
1.  In <hi rend="underline">penali</hi>, thence in<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">Constitutionali</hi>, impunity<lb/>
to delinquency in almost<lb/>
any shape.<lb/>
By co-operation, with or<lb/>
without concert, on persons<lb/>
liable to serve as Jurymen,<lb/>
this effect producible to an<lb/>
indefinite extent.<lb/>
New Trial here, none.</p>
<p>104.<lb/>
2.  In <hi rend="underline">civili</hi>, power not<lb/>
so absolute.  Here new<lb/>
trial.  But in large proportion,<lb/>
delay, vexation<lb/>
and expence prevents it,<lb/>
be the ground for it<lb/>
ever so good.<lb/>
Necessary to obtain<lb/>
Appeal to another such<lb/>
Judicatory, judging on<lb/>
evidence in it's best<lb/>
shape, is an intermediate<lb/>
one, judging on Evidence<lb/>
in an inferior shape.</p>
<pb/>
<p>105.<lb/>
As between Judge and<lb/>
Jury, to the power on<lb/>
neither part is any adequate<lb/>
bridle applied by<lb/>
d<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi> on the other.<lb/>
True, when Jury have given<lb/>
an unjust verdict,<lb/>
Judge may and does destroy<lb/>
the effect of it, otherwise<lb/>
than by granting a<lb/>
new trial:  but then it is<lb/>
without even presence of<lb/>
regard to the merits, and<lb/>
by means by which the<lb/>
effect of a just verdict<lb/>
may with equal facility,<lb/>
be destroyed.<lb/>
So, Jury may knowingly<lb/>
give an unjust verdict:<lb/>
and this the Judge can<lb/>
not prevent, though by<lb/>
granting new trial, if<lb/>
applied for, as above, he<lb/>
may apply a remedy<lb/>
which, in many cases,<lb/>
will not be worth the<lb/>
cost.<lb/>
To the power of destroying<lb/>
the effect of a just<lb/>
conviction, on grounds<lb/>
which have nothing to do<lb/>
with the merits, and<lb/>
which have been manufactured<lb/>
by persons subject<lb/>
to his authority, the<lb/>
power of the Jury applies<lb/>
no bridle.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 15:25, 18 February 2022

Click Here To Edit

1823. Septr. 10.

Constitutional Code

102.
8. Legal responsibility,
none: i.e. punibility &
dislocability, none. Power
over the fate of the suit,
to a vast extent, absolute:
on condition of self annoyance
to a certain
extent, this power in the
hands of any one, and he
irresponsible. To the most
mischievous, no less than
the most beneficial purpose
is this power applicable.
☞ Note dislocability of
Guinea-men, by King.

103.
Effects producible by this
despotism.
1. In penali, thence in
Constitutionali, impunity
to delinquency in almost
any shape.
By co-operation, with or
without concert, on persons
liable to serve as Jurymen,
this effect producible to an
indefinite extent.
New Trial here, none.

104.
2. In civili, power not
so absolute. Here new
trial. But in large proportion,
delay, vexation
and expence prevents it,
be the ground for it
ever so good.
Necessary to obtain
Appeal to another such
Judicatory, judging on
evidence in it's best
shape, is an intermediate
one, judging on Evidence
in an inferior shape.


---page break---

105.
As between Judge and
Jury, to the power on
neither part is any adequate
bridle applied by
do. on the other.
True, when Jury have given
an unjust verdict,
Judge may and does destroy
the effect of it, otherwise
than by granting a
new trial: but then it is
without even presence of
regard to the merits, and
by means by which the
effect of a just verdict
may with equal facility,
be destroyed.
So, Jury may knowingly
give an unjust verdict:
and this the Judge can
not prevent, though by
granting new trial, if
applied for, as above, he
may apply a remedy
which, in many cases,
will not be worth the
cost.
To the power of destroying
the effect of a just
conviction, on grounds
which have nothing to do
with the merits, and
which have been manufactured
by persons subject
to his authority, the
power of the Jury applies
no bridle.


Identifier: | JB/034/054/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 34.

Date_1

1823-09-10

Marginal Summary Numbering

102-105

Box

034

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

054

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

quasi jury

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d11

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

10328

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in