JB/121/361/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/121/361/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/121/361/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/361/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/361/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->11 May 1802<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Inessentialia?<lb/>
 
Dispensing power</head></p>
 
<p>In the <del><gap/></del> case <add>of 1766,</add> the ground of confidence was –<lb/>
 
acknowledged subserviency of the measure to the public<lb/>
interest and the full assurance <add>assured hope</add> of <add>general</add> public approbation<lb/>
in the other case.  The ground of confidence was that<lb/>
<del>whatsoever</del> <add>for consideration</add> notwithstanding the repugnancy of the measure to<lb/>
public interest it was not that sort of measure on<lb/>
<add>behalf of</add> which the passions of the public were apt <add>arm themselves</add> to take an<lb/>
interest and that the only individual to whom any<lb/>
prominent and special injury <add>distinguishable damage</add> would result from it<lb/>
was one whom by reason of the particular predicament<lb/>
in which it stood they had it in their power to<lb/>
<add>injure and</add> oppress without <del><gap/></del> <add>remedy for him</add> or hazard to themselves.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 16:42, 11 March 2022

'Click Here To Edit

11 May 1802
Inessentialia?
Dispensing power

In the case of 1766, the ground of confidence was –
acknowledged subserviency of the measure to the public
interest and the full assurance assured hope of general public approbation
in the other case. The ground of confidence was that
whatsoever for consideration notwithstanding the repugnancy of the measure to
public interest it was not that sort of measure on
behalf of which the passions of the public were apt arm themselves to take an
interest and that the only individual to whom any
prominent and special injury distinguishable damage would result from it
was one whom by reason of the particular predicament
in which it stood they had it in their power to
injure and oppress without remedy for him or hazard to themselves.


Identifier: | JB/121/361/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121.

Date_1

1802-05-11

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

121

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

361

Info in main headings field

Inessentialia? Dispensing power

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

D6 / E6

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

[[notes_public::Omitted [note in Bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in