★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
m Protected "JB/106/194/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/194/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/106/194/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p><!-- pencil -->16 May 1807</p> | |||
<p>No (says somebody) the proper standard of rectitude is –<lb/> | |||
<del>not the</del> <add>not the</add> will of the sovereign <add>simple-headed or many-headed</add> but the welfare of the people.<lb/> | |||
I answer: it is both together; there is no opposition in the case.<lb/> | |||
No one will say in our days – in <add>under</add> the present monarchy, any<lb/> | |||
more than in the present democracy – that any other object<lb/> | |||
than the welfare of the people <add>community</add> – the greatest happiness of the<lb/> | |||
greatest number of the members <add>ought to be regarded</add> as the ultimate standard of<lb/> | |||
rectitude. But the question is not a question of theory <add>regards not theory <del>but</del></add> <del>or</del> but<lb/> | |||
of practice: and for practice the only object that will serve<lb/> | |||
as <add>in the character of</add> a standard of rectitude is the will or wills of<lb/> | |||
some determinate person or persons – that is to say some<lb/> | |||
form <add>assemblage</add> of words containing the expression of such will or wills.</p> | |||
<p>The question is – not what ought to be taken for the standard<lb/> | |||
of rectitude by a person thinking only <add>sitting or lies <unclear>about</unclear></add> – thinking for himself<lb/> | |||
alone and by himself, but what ought to be taken for the<lb/> | |||
standard of rectitude by a <add>the</add> Judge sitting in the judgment not<lb/> | |||
thinking and acting for the public.</p> | |||
<p><del>What then <gap/></del> By the Judge then what is it that<lb/> | |||
ought to be taken for the standard of rectitude <add>of decision</add>? the will of the<lb/> | |||
sovereign, or the welfare of the people? The answer plainly<lb/> | |||
is – the will of the sovereign <add>as far as it is known</add>: otherwise he himself is sovereign<lb/> | |||
as well as judge. Shall it be the welfare of the people<lb/> | |||
<del>i.e. what be</del> shall his decision be that which in his own opinion<lb/> | |||
real or pretended, is most conducive to the welfare of the people,<lb/> | |||
no regard being at the same time paid to the will of the sovereign,<lb/> | |||
or of any other person than himself? Acting thus is acting<lb/> | |||
exactly as the sovereign does: this is not judicature, but<lb/> | |||
sovereignty.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
16 May 1807
No (says somebody) the proper standard of rectitude is –
not the not the will of the sovereign simple-headed or many-headed but the welfare of the people.
I answer: it is both together; there is no opposition in the case.
No one will say in our days – in under the present monarchy, any
more than in the present democracy – that any other object
than the welfare of the people community – the greatest happiness of the
greatest number of the members ought to be regarded as the ultimate standard of
rectitude. But the question is not a question of theory regards not theory but or but
of practice: and for practice the only object that will serve
as in the character of a standard of rectitude is the will or wills of
some determinate person or persons – that is to say some
form assemblage of words containing the expression of such will or wills.
The question is – not what ought to be taken for the standard
of rectitude by a person thinking only sitting or lies about – thinking for himself
alone and by himself, but what ought to be taken for the
standard of rectitude by a the Judge sitting in the judgment not
thinking and acting for the public.
What then By the Judge then what is it that
ought to be taken for the standard of rectitude of decision? the will of the
sovereign, or the welfare of the people? The answer plainly
is – the will of the sovereign as far as it is known: otherwise he himself is sovereign
as well as judge. Shall it be the welfare of the people
i.e. what be shall his decision be that which in his own opinion
real or pretended, is most conducive to the welfare of the people,
no regard being at the same time paid to the will of the sovereign,
or of any other person than himself? Acting thus is acting
exactly as the sovereign does: this is not judicature, but
sovereignty.
Identifier: | JB/106/194/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1807-05-18 |
1-3 |
||
106 |
scotch reform |
||
194 |
|||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
c1 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
34782 |
|||