JB/106/195/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/106/195/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/106/195/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/195/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/195/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->16 May 1807</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>On that part of the ground <add>a man</add> may <del>the <gap/></del> may see<lb/>
 
lying in wait for him, a very perplexing question.  The<lb/>
 
will of the sovereign has been declared:  and in the opinion of<lb/>
 
the Judge, it is in a <gap/> degree adverse to the welfare<lb/>
of the people.  In this case to which of the two standards<lb/>
shall his decision be <del><gap/></del> conformable?</p>
<p>Be a mans answer what it may <add>On this question whatsoever of the two opposite sides a</add><lb/>
man takes he <del><gap/></del> may behold a set of combatants in a<lb/>
state of fury, ready to fall upon him without mercy.<lb/>
The will of the sovereign?  Oh then he is a <unclear>vile</unclear> and <gap/><lb/>
<gap/>, <del>the ready to</del> a tool at the command of every tyrant<lb/>
that will <unclear>vouchsafe</unclear> <add>deign</add> to make use of him.  The welfare of the<lb/>
people?  Oh then he is an insurrectionist, a democrat <add>an anarchist</add>:<lb/>
or rather under the mast of democracy, a despot.</p>
<p>Difficult and slippery as the question is – it is much<lb/>
better to face it <add>openly and calmly</add> than to elude <add>avoid</add> it altogether, or to<lb/>
answer it by a response purposely <del><gap/></del> ambiguous or<lb/>
obscure.  A man who means honestly has no need of subterfuge.<lb/>
<del>obscure.</del></p>
<p><add>Conceivable cases might should</add> Cases I suppose might be put of a law, much more<lb/>
of a system of laws, so mischievous that on the part of a Judge<lb/>
it would be neither of merit rather than blame, to <del><gap/></del><lb/>
avoid lending his hand to the execution of them:  or even to<lb/>
take active measures for <del><gap/></del> frustrating them as much as<lb/>
possible of their effect.  If any such case can be put, it<lb/>
must then be admitted with whatsoever reluctance, that under<lb/>
such a dilemma it may happen that a judge may feel<lb/>
himself at liberty to use his discretion, and in using it may<lb/>
take either side <add>the one side or the other</add> without blame.<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> In many instances<lb/>
such for example must<lb/>
have been the situation of<lb/>
many a judge in England,<lb/>
at the time of the last civil<lb/>
wars in the middle of<lb/>
the 17<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> Century.</note></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:52, 27 August 2023

Click Here To Edit

16 May 1807

On that part of the ground a man may the may see
lying in wait for him, a very perplexing question. The
will of the sovereign has been declared: and in the opinion of
the Judge, it is in a degree adverse to the welfare
of the people. In this case to which of the two standards
shall his decision be conformable?

Be a mans answer what it may On this question whatsoever of the two opposite sides a
man takes he may behold a set of combatants in a
state of fury, ready to fall upon him without mercy.
The will of the sovereign? Oh then he is a vile and
, the ready to a tool at the command of every tyrant
that will vouchsafe deign to make use of him. The welfare of the
people? Oh then he is an insurrectionist, a democrat an anarchist:
or rather under the mast of democracy, a despot.

Difficult and slippery as the question is – it is much
better to face it openly and calmly than to elude avoid it altogether, or to
answer it by a response purposely ambiguous or
obscure. A man who means honestly has no need of subterfuge.
obscure.

Conceivable cases might should Cases I suppose might be put of a law, much more
of a system of laws, so mischievous that on the part of a Judge
it would be neither of merit rather than blame, to
avoid lending his hand to the execution of them: or even to
take active measures for frustrating them as much as
possible of their effect. If any such case can be put, it
must then be admitted with whatsoever reluctance, that under
such a dilemma it may happen that a judge may feel
himself at liberty to use his discretion, and in using it may
take either side the one side or the other without blame. In many instances
such for example must
have been the situation of
many a judge in England,
at the time of the last civil
wars in the middle of
the 17th Century.


Identifier: | JB/106/195/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1807-05-18

Marginal Summary Numbering

4-6

Box

106

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

195

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

iping 1804

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

bernardino rivadavia

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1804

Notes public

ID Number

34783

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in