JB/106/316/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/106/316/002: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
<p>1821 Nov<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi> 16<lb/>
<p>1821 Nov<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi> 16<lb/>
<!-- pencil --><head>Codification Proposal</head></p>
<!-- pencil --><head>Codification Proposal</head></p>
<p><del><gap/> <gap/></del> 2.  <del>Why all wait for</del> Invitations why not would <gap/></p>
<p><del><gap/> <gap/></del> 2.  <del>Why all wait for</del> Invitations why not would for</p>
<p>Answer.  For such to work, from an imaginable<lb/>
<p>Answer.  For such to work, from an imaginable<lb/>
quarter was <del><gap/></del> <add>has the suit</add> reputation <add>of any such invitation been</add> reasonably to be expected.</p>
quarter was <del><gap/></del> <add>has the suit</add> reputation <add>of any such invitation been</add> reasonably to be expected.</p>
Line 12: Line 12:
<p>2.  In the instances in which <add>from an authority</add> to <del>one in check</del><lb/>
<p>2.  In the instances in which <add>from an authority</add> to <del>one in check</del><lb/>
an offer directly made a favourable end had naturally <add>an <unclear>incipient</unclear> initiative acceptance had been<lb/>
an offer directly made a favourable end had naturally <add>an <unclear>incipient</unclear> initiative acceptance had been<lb/>
given</add> been but, <add>definitive and</add> effective acceptance had not followed.  <unclear>True</unclear><lb/>
given</add> been but, <add>definitive and</add> effective acceptance had not followed.  The<lb/>
<gap/> <unclear>acceptance</unclear> had been <add>was</add> given by the <gap/> – the <gap/> of<lb/>
Spain <unclear>acceptance</unclear> had been <add>was</add> given by the <gap/> – the <gap/> of<lb/>
Ministers with information that the offer had been laid before the King.  But of any <gap/> <gap/><lb/>
Ministers with information that the offer had been laid before the King.  But of any <gap/> acceptance<lb/>
<gap/> by the <gap/> <gap/><lb/>
<gap/> by the Cortes or<lb/>
<gap/> the <unclear>King</unclear> no advice<lb/>
from the King no advice<lb/>
being at present <add><gap/> be the <unclear>law</unclear></add> 17 Nov<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 1820<lb/>
being at present <add>down be the time</add> 17 Nov<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 1820<lb/>
been received</p>
been received</p>
<p>Doubtless <del>supposing <add><gap/></add> mistaken so have given</del><lb/>
<p>Doubtless <del>supposing <add>that</add> invitation to have given</del><lb/>
if in any instance <gap/> had been given, <del>the <gap/></del><lb/>
if in any instance invitation had been given, <del>the <gap/></del><lb/>
supposing the <gap/> not unworthy of receiving the <gap/><lb/>
supposing the <unclear>individual</unclear> not unworthy of receiving the <gap/><lb/>
<del>not</del> a would have been more honourable to <unclear>bill</unclear> parties<lb/>
<del>not</del> a would have been more honourable to both parties<lb/>
and more encouraging so that one of them be <gap/><lb/>
and more encouraging so that one of them to whom<lb/>
for <del>the <gap/></del> his support under a work of such<lb/>
for <del>the <gap/></del> his support under a work of such<lb/>
unexampled difficulty and labour, encouragement<lb/>
unexampled difficulty and labour, encouragement<lb/>
Line 31: Line 31:
question is – not what course would have been most<lb/>
question is – not what course would have been most<lb/>
gratifying to the feelings of this or that individual, but what<lb/>
gratifying to the feelings of this or that individual, but what<lb/>
would be <del><gap/></del> in the higher degree <gap/> to the happiness<lb/>
would be <del><gap/></del> in the higher degree conducive to the happiness<lb/>
<del>of the nature <gap/></del> <add>in the first place of this or that</add> particular <gap/>, in the next place<lb/>
<del>of the nature <gap/></del> <add>in the first place of this or that</add> particular nation, in the next place<lb/>
<del>of <gap/> <gap/></del> eventually of the whole human race.<lb/>
<del>of <gap/> <gap/></del> eventually of the whole human race.<lb/>
Regarding himself as not incompetent to the rendering<lb/>
Regarding himself as not incompetent to the rendering<lb/>
Line 38: Line 38:
was it for him to have declared rendering it, and for no<lb/>
was it for him to have declared rendering it, and for no<lb/>
better reason than <gap/> not having <unclear>received</unclear> in the shape in<lb/>
better reason than <gap/> not having <unclear>received</unclear> in the shape in<lb/>
question, <gap/> gratification to be passions of pride and<lb/>
question, personal gratification to his passions of pride and<lb/>
vanity.  With <gap/> such prospect before him, a real love of<lb/>
vanity.  With never such prospect before him, a real love of<lb/>
mankind could not<lb/>
mankind would not<lb/>
he be ready to pick<lb/>
he be ready to pick<lb/>
the dust at the feet<lb/>
the dust at the feet<lb/>
of the <gap/> individual<lb/>
of the <gap/> individual<lb/>
of the species<lb/>
of the species<lb/>
<add><gap/></add> rather than forego<lb/>
<add>given</add> rather than forego<lb/>
all chance of being<lb/>
all chance of being<lb/>
without such a<lb/>
without such a<lb/>
<gap/>?</p>
service?</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:23, 14 January 2025

Click Here To Edit

1821 Novr. 16
Codification Proposal

2. Why all wait for Invitations why not would for

Answer. For such to work, from an imaginable
quarter was has the suit reputation of any such invitation been reasonably to be expected.

1. The Without express provision and information the existence of
any individual competent even in his own eyes to the
execution of such a work was not to be anticipated.

2. In the instances in which from an authority to one in check
an offer directly made a favourable end had naturally an incipient initiative acceptance had been
given
been but, definitive and effective acceptance had not followed. The
Spain acceptance had been was given by the – the of
Ministers with information that the offer had been laid before the King. But of any acceptance
by the Cortes or
from the King no advice
being at present down be the time 17 Novr 1820
been received

Doubtless supposing that invitation to have given
if in any instance invitation had been given, the
supposing the individual not unworthy of receiving the
not a would have been more honourable to both parties
and more encouraging so that one of them to whom
for the his support under a work of such
unexampled difficulty and labour, encouragement
would have been so eminently as serviceable, not to if not
altogether
say indispensable.

But on this occasion the proper
question is – not what course would have been most
gratifying to the feelings of this or that individual, but what
would be in the higher degree conducive to the happiness
of the nature in the first place of this or that particular nation, in the next place
of eventually of the whole human race.
Regarding himself as not incompetent to the rendering
service to mankind in this shape and to this extent
was it for him to have declared rendering it, and for no
better reason than not having received in the shape in
question, personal gratification to his passions of pride and
vanity. With never such prospect before him, a real love of
mankind would not
he be ready to pick
the dust at the feet
of the individual
of the species
given rather than forego
all chance of being
without such a
service?


Identifier: | JB/106/316/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1821-11-16

Marginal Summary Numbering

10 or 1 - 11 or 2

Box

106

Main Headings

codification proposal (codification offer)

Folio number

316

Info in main headings field

codification proposal

Image

002

Titles

invitation why not waited for

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

verso

Page Numbering

c1 / d7 / e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

c wilmott 1819

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

andreas louriottis

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1819

Notes public

ID Number

349910004

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in