JB/052/425/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/052/425/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/052/425/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>D.</p> <!-- the text is arranged in two columns on the right hand side of the page --> <p>III Ablative facts negated<lb/>continued.</p> <p>IX Ablative facts <sic>negatived</sic>.<lb/>Of any adequate<lb/>ablative fact the effect<lb/>will be, in every case<lb/>to take away any<lb/>right conferred by a<lb/>Collative fact.  The affirmance<lb/>of the non-existence<lb/>of all such<lb/>ablative facts must<lb/>therefore be exacted, as<lb/>well as the affirmance<lb/>of the existence of a<lb/>Collative fact as per<lb/><sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> VI, and thence of<lb/>A right to the Effective<lb/>Service demanded, as<lb/>per <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> IV.<lb/>[+]</p> <!-- text from the bottom of the column --> <p>[+]1 Ablative with relation<lb/>to the title of the<lb/>Pursuer to the services<lb/>respectively demanded<lb?>of them, any such fact<lb/>will, with relation to the<lb/><sic>burthen</sic> imposed on the Defendant<lb/>by the obligation<lb/>of rendering any such<lb/>service be exonerative.</p> <p>X. COunterevidence<lb/>if any, from what<lb/>sources expected.<lb/>Counter evidence is Evidence<lb/>either in disproof<lb/>of a fact, which<lb/>with reference to the<lb/>Pursuer's Demand is a<lb/>Collative fact, as per<lb/><sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> VI, or in proof<lb/>of a fact which, with reference to it is an<lb/>Ablative fact, as per<lb/><sic>No</sic> IX</p> <pb/> <!-- start of second column --> <p>XI. Counterdemand,<lb/>whether any, and if any,<lb/>what, according to the knowledge<lb/>or belief of the Private<lb/> Pursuer, declared: counterdemand,<lb/>to wit a Demand<lb/>on the part of<lb/>a proposed Defendant,<lb/>at the charge of such<lb/>Private Pursuer.  Any<lb/>such counterdemand, if just, will according<lb/><del>to</del> <add>to its value as compared with</add> the value of the corresponding<lb/>Effective Service,<lb/>take away <del><gap/></del><lb/>such Pursuers right<lb/>to <del>the effective Service</del> <add>it</add><sic>No</sic> IV.  But<lb/>it will not afford, as<lb/>an Ablative fact would<lb/>A ground for the dismissal<lb/>of the Private<lb/>Pursuers Demands:<lb/>only for doing away, or<lb?>lessening the amount of<lb/>any <hi rend="underline">preliminary security</hi>,<lb/>which might be<lb/>needful, for securing<lb/>execution to the Collative<lb/>portion of</del> Law,<lb/>As per <sic>No</sic> V, and thus<lb/>to the Private Pursuer<lb/>the benefit of the Effective<lb/>Service as per <sic>No</sic> IV.<lb/>Much less will it operate<lb/>towards the dismissal of<lb/>the Public Pursuer's<lb/>Demand as per <sic>No</sic> IX.</p> <p>XII. Judicial Service demanded.<lb/>This will<lb/>consist in the performance<lb/>of all such Judicial acts<lb/><!-- continues along the edge of the page --> as will be necessary to the <gap/> the Collative <del><gap/></del> Law as per <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> V. to receive execution and effect, and thereby the Effective Service as per <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> IV, to be<lb/>rendered.</p>   
<head>D.</head> <!-- the text is arranged in two columns on the right hand side of the page --> <p>III Ablative facts negated<lb/>continued.</p> <p>IX Ablative facts <sic>negatived</sic>.<lb/>Of any adequate<lb/>ablative fact the effect<lb/>will be, in every case<lb/>to take away any<lb/>right conferred by a<lb/>Collative fact.  The affirmance<lb/>of the non-existence<lb/>of all such<lb/>ablative facts must<lb/>therefore be exacted, as<lb/>well as the affirmance<lb/>of the existence of a<lb/>Collative fact as per<lb/><sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> VI, and thence of<lb/>A right to the Effective<lb/>Service demanded, as<lb/>per <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> IV.<lb/>[+]</p> <!-- text from the bottom of the column --> <p>[+]1 Ablative with relation<lb/>to the title of the<lb/>Pursuer to the services<lb/>respectively demanded<lb/>of them, any such fact<lb/>will, with relation to the<lb/><sic>burthen</sic> imposed on the Defendant<lb/>by the obligation<lb/>of rendering any such<lb/>service be exonerative.</p> <p>X. Counterevidence<lb/>if any, from what<lb/>sources expected.<lb/>Counter evidence is Evidence<lb/>either in disproof<lb/>of a fact, which<lb/>with reference to the<lb/>Pursuer's Demand is a<lb/>Collative fact, as per<lb/><sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> VI, or in proof<lb/>of a fact which, with<lb/>reference to it is an<lb/>Ablative fact, as per<lb/><sic>No</sic> IX</p> <pb/> <!-- start of second column --> <p>XI. Counterdemand,<lb/>whether any, and if any,<lb/>what, according to the knowledge<lb/>or belief of the Private<lb/> Pursuer, declared: counterdemand,<lb/>to wit a Demand<lb/>on the part of<lb/>a proposed Defendant,<lb/>at the charge of such<lb/>Private Pursuer.  Any<lb/>such counterdemand,<lb/>if just, will according<lb/><del>to</del> <add>to its value as compared with</add> the value of the corresponding<lb/>Effective Service,<lb/>take away <del><gap/></del><lb/>such Pursuers right<lb/>to <del>the effective Service</del> <add>it</add><lb/>as per <sic>No</sic> IV.  But<lb/>it will not afford, as<lb/>an Ablative fact would<lb/>a ground for the dismissal<lb/>of the Private<lb/>Pursuers Demands:<lb/>only for doing away, or<lb/>lessening the amount of<lb/>any <hi rend="underline">preliminary security</hi>,<lb/>which might be<lb/>needful, for securing<lb/>execution to the Collative<lb/><del>portion of</del> Law,<lb/>as per <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> V, and thus<lb/>to the Private Pursuer<lb/>the benefit of the Effective<lb/>Service as per <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> IV.<lb/>Much less will it operate<lb/>towards the dismissal of<lb/>the Public Pursuer's<lb/>Demand as per <sic>No</sic> IX.</p> <p>XII. Judicial Service demanded.<lb/>This will<lb/>consist in the performance<lb/>of all such Judicial acts<lb/><!-- continues along the edge of the page --> as will be necessary to the causing the Collative <del>portion</del> Law as per <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> V. to receive execution and effect, and thereby the Effective Service as per <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> IV, to be<lb/>rendered.</p>   






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:56, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

D.

III Ablative facts negated
continued.

IX Ablative facts negatived.
Of any adequate
ablative fact the effect
will be, in every case
to take away any
right conferred by a
Collative fact. The affirmance
of the non-existence
of all such
ablative facts must
therefore be exacted, as
well as the affirmance
of the existence of a
Collative fact as per
No VI, and thence of
A right to the Effective
Service demanded, as
per No IV.
[+]

[+]1 Ablative with relation
to the title of the
Pursuer to the services
respectively demanded
of them, any such fact
will, with relation to the
burthen imposed on the Defendant
by the obligation
of rendering any such
service be exonerative.

X. Counterevidence
if any, from what
sources expected.
Counter evidence is Evidence
either in disproof
of a fact, which
with reference to the
Pursuer's Demand is a
Collative fact, as per
No VI, or in proof
of a fact which, with
reference to it is an
Ablative fact, as per
No IX


---page break---

XI. Counterdemand,
whether any, and if any,
what, according to the knowledge
or belief of the Private
Pursuer, declared: counterdemand,
to wit a Demand
on the part of
a proposed Defendant,
at the charge of such
Private Pursuer. Any
such counterdemand,
if just, will according
to to its value as compared with the value of the corresponding
Effective Service,
take away
such Pursuers right
to the effective Service it
as per No IV. But
it will not afford, as
an Ablative fact would
a ground for the dismissal
of the Private
Pursuers Demands:
only for doing away, or
lessening the amount of
any preliminary security,
which might be
needful, for securing
execution to the Collative
portion of Law,
as per No V, and thus
to the Private Pursuer
the benefit of the Effective
Service as per No IV.
Much less will it operate
towards the dismissal of
the Public Pursuer's
Demand as per No IX.

XII. Judicial Service demanded.
This will
consist in the performance
of all such Judicial acts
as will be necessary to the causing the Collative portion Law as per No V. to receive execution and effect, and thereby the Effective Service as per No IV, to be
rendered.




Identifier: | JB/052/425/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

052

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

425

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

ablative facts negatived continued

Category

plan

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

17098

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in