JB/038/021/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/038/021/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/038/021/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/038/021/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/038/021/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1822 Apr 29</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><head><del>Economy not Office</del><lb/>
 
&sect;.  Moral Aptitude – Efficient Causes<lb/>
 
Public Opinion Tribunal</head></p>
 
<p>or 1.<lb/>
[2. A.]  Moral aptitude<lb/>
causes.<lb/>
1.  Abstaining from annexing<lb/>
to the office power<lb/>
more than necessary.<lb/>
2.  Application of counterforces.</p>
<p>or 2*<lb/>
Generally applicable<lb/>
counterforce to official<lb/>
power – power of the <add>moral or</add> popular<lb/>
sanction:  exercised<lb/>
By Public opinion<lb/>
Tribunal.<lb/>
Instrument of its exercise<lb/>
publicity or say divulgation.<lb/>
Desirable subject matters<lb/>
of divulgation<lb/>
[viz. in addition to Ordinance<lb/>
and misdeeds in transgression<lb/>
thereof]<lb/>
1.  Tribunal's Decison<lb/>
as given by the Suffrage of the<lb/>
<unclear>several</unclear> members<lb/>
2.  Grounds of d<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi></p>
<p>or 3.*<lb/>
[2. A.]  Decision not being<lb/>
ascertainable, sole<lb/>
subject matter of divulgation,<lb/>
its <hi rend="underline">grounds</hi> – from<lb/>
its grounds alone can<lb/>
decision itself be inferred.</p>
<p>or 4.*<lb/>
[2. A]  Subject matter<lb/>
of the assumption necessary<lb/>
in this case.<lb/>
1.  Purport of the decision.<lb/>
2.  Rectitude or say aptitude<lb/>
of d<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi></p>
<p>or 5.*<lb/>
[2. A.]  Efficient causes<lb/>
of the presumption as<lb/>
to the purport of the decision –<lb/>
Circumstances<lb/>
constitutive of the state<lb/>
of the case as per view<lb/>
taken of them by the individual<lb/>
in question:<lb/>
<add>from</add></p>
<pb/>
<p><head><del>Economy not Office</del><lb/>
&sect;.  Moral Aptitude – Efficient Causes<lb/>
Public Opinion Tribunal</head></p>
<p>or 5 contin<hi rend="superscript">d.</hi><lb/>
from them he will<lb/>
form his judgment as<lb/>
to the view likely to be<lb/>
taken by the several<lb/>
other members of that<lb/>
tribunal:  their respective<lb/>
aptitude and inaptitude<lb/>
as produced by the appropriate<lb/>
efficient causes,<lb/>
taken into account.</p>
<p>6.*<lb/>
[2. A.]  Efficient causes<lb/>
of presumption in affirmance<lb/>
of public opinion<lb/>
tribunal's superior<lb/>
aptitude as compared<lb/>
with public functionaries<lb/>
d<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi><lb/>
A.  Rectitude here not<lb/>
positive but comparative.</p>
<p>7.*<lb/>
2.  Object of comparison<lb/>
what?<lb/>
A.  D<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi> of the smaller<lb/>
number [i.e. of the<lb/>
ruling few].</p>
<p>8.*<lb/>
2.  Use of public opinion:<lb/>
from being by supposition<lb/>
the acting as a<lb/>
counterforce to that of a<lb/>
comparatively small<lb/>
aggregate body, of which<lb/>
the functionary in question,<lb/>
as such, is a<lb/>
  , the body to which<lb/>
it stands in this relation<lb/>
must be that of the<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">ruling few</hi>:  to say that<lb/>
such counterforce is<lb/>
useful, is virtually to<lb/>
assert that in the decisions<lb/>
of the ruling few<lb/>
as such, there is a great</p>
<pb/>
<p><head><del>Economy not Office</del><lb/>
&sect;.  Moral Aptitude – Efficient Causes<lb/>
Public Opinion Tribunal</head></p>
<p>8* contin<hi rend="superscript">d.</hi><lb/>
tendency towards inaptitude:<lb/>
if so, what is<lb/>
its efficient cause?<lb/>
A.  The facilities<lb/>
which the functionary's<lb/>
body has of giving<lb/>
effect to its will &amp; interest<lb/>
to the prejudice &amp; sacrifice<lb/>
of subject many's<lb/>
interest.<lb/>
Public opinion tribunal's<lb/>
counterforce apart, efficiency<lb/>
of ruling few's<lb/>
factitious means of influence<lb/>
is as the magnitude<lb/>
of their power:  &amp;<lb/>
as to their will its being<lb/>
generally determined<lb/>
by personal interest<lb/>
follows from the nature<lb/>
of man.</p>
<p>9.*<lb/>
No individual decision<lb/>
of public opinion tribunal<lb/>
being other than a<lb/>
fiction, exists there any<lb/>
really pronounced decision<lb/>
that can reasonably<lb/>
be regarded as an<lb/>
adequate substitute to a<lb/>
real d<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi><lb/>
A.  yes:  the verdict of a<lb/>
Jury aptly constituted.<lb/>
A Jury so constituted;  may<lb/>
be stiled a Section of<lb/>
that tribunal.</p>
<p>10.*<hi rend="superscript">†</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">†</hi> Discard this to the topic of Jury Trial?</note><lb/>
2.  Apt constitution of<lb/>
a Jury, what?<lb/>
A.  That which makes the<lb/>
location of its members the<lb/>
act of chance, applied to<lb/>
the aggregate number of<lb/>
those regarded as apt.</p>
<pb/>
<p>11.*<lb/>
Note, in any public<lb/>
functionary, power of<lb/>
such location is power<lb/>
of exercising corruptive<lb/>
influence.  Of no individual<lb/>
can there be<lb/>
<add>any</add> adequate assurance<lb/>
of his not being subjectible<lb/>
to corruptive influence,<lb/>
nor of functionary<lb/>
of his not being<lb/>
disposed to exercise it.<lb/>
Therefore, to the Legislator<lb/>
belongs to appoint<lb/>
the class, whose decisions<lb/>
are most likely to be<lb/>
conformable to the universal<lb/>
interest, and to<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">chance</hi> to select out of this<lb/>
class individuals to constitute<lb/>
the Jury on each<lb/>
occasion.<lb/>
&#9758; Add here the distinction<lb/>
between Jury with<lb/>
an <hi rend="underline">obligatory</hi> verdict &amp;<lb/>
d<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi> with an <hi rend="underline">unobligatory</hi><lb/>
d<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi>.  Jury of <hi rend="underline">volition</hi>, and<lb/>
d<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi> of <hi rend="underline">opinion</hi> only.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:14, 24 May 2022

Click Here To Edit

1822 Apr 29

Economy not Office
§. Moral Aptitude – Efficient Causes
Public Opinion Tribunal

or 1.
[2. A.] Moral aptitude
causes.
1. Abstaining from annexing
to the office power
more than necessary.
2. Application of counterforces.

or 2*
Generally applicable
counterforce to official
power – power of the moral or popular
sanction: exercised
By Public opinion
Tribunal.
Instrument of its exercise
publicity or say divulgation.
Desirable subject matters
of divulgation
[viz. in addition to Ordinance
and misdeeds in transgression
thereof]
1. Tribunal's Decison
as given by the Suffrage of the
several members
2. Grounds of do.

or 3.*
[2. A.] Decision not being
ascertainable, sole
subject matter of divulgation,
its grounds – from
its grounds alone can
decision itself be inferred.

or 4.*
[2. A] Subject matter
of the assumption necessary
in this case.
1. Purport of the decision.
2. Rectitude or say aptitude
of do.

or 5.*
[2. A.] Efficient causes
of the presumption as
to the purport of the decision –
Circumstances
constitutive of the state
of the case as per view
taken of them by the individual
in question:
from


---page break---

Economy not Office
§. Moral Aptitude – Efficient Causes
Public Opinion Tribunal

or 5 contind.
from them he will
form his judgment as
to the view likely to be
taken by the several
other members of that
tribunal: their respective
aptitude and inaptitude
as produced by the appropriate
efficient causes,
taken into account.

6.*
[2. A.] Efficient causes
of presumption in affirmance
of public opinion
tribunal's superior
aptitude as compared
with public functionaries
do.
A. Rectitude here not
positive but comparative.

7.*
2. Object of comparison
what?
A. Do. of the smaller
number [i.e. of the
ruling few].

8.*
2. Use of public opinion:
from being by supposition
the acting as a
counterforce to that of a
comparatively small
aggregate body, of which
the functionary in question,
as such, is a
, the body to which
it stands in this relation
must be that of the
ruling few: to say that
such counterforce is
useful, is virtually to
assert that in the decisions
of the ruling few
as such, there is a great


---page break---

Economy not Office
§. Moral Aptitude – Efficient Causes
Public Opinion Tribunal

8* contind.
tendency towards inaptitude:
if so, what is
its efficient cause?
A. The facilities
which the functionary's
body has of giving
effect to its will & interest
to the prejudice & sacrifice
of subject many's
interest.
Public opinion tribunal's
counterforce apart, efficiency
of ruling few's
factitious means of influence
is as the magnitude
of their power: &
as to their will its being
generally determined
by personal interest
follows from the nature
of man.

9.*
No individual decision
of public opinion tribunal
being other than a
fiction, exists there any
really pronounced decision
that can reasonably
be regarded as an
adequate substitute to a
real do.
A. yes: the verdict of a
Jury aptly constituted.
A Jury so constituted; may
be stiled a Section of
that tribunal.

10.* Discard this to the topic of Jury Trial?
2. Apt constitution of
a Jury, what?
A. That which makes the
location of its members the
act of chance, applied to
the aggregate number of
those regarded as apt.


---page break---

11.*
Note, in any public
functionary, power of
such location is power
of exercising corruptive
influence. Of no individual
can there be
any adequate assurance
of his not being subjectible
to corruptive influence,
nor of functionary
of his not being
disposed to exercise it.
Therefore, to the Legislator
belongs to appoint
the class, whose decisions
are most likely to be
conformable to the universal
interest, and to
chance to select out of this
class individuals to constitute
the Jury on each
occasion.
☞ Add here the distinction
between Jury with
an obligatory verdict &
do. with an unobligatory
do.. Jury of volition, and
do. of opinion only.


Identifier: | JB/038/021/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 38.

Date_1

1822-04-29

Marginal Summary Numbering

or 1* - or 5*, 6* - 11*

Box

038

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

021

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

moral aptitude / efficient cause / public opinion tribunal

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d1 / e1

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

j whatman 1819

Marginals

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1819

Notes public

ID Number

11658

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in