JB/047/067/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/047/067/001: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/047/067/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/047/067/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->18 March 1806<lb/>
 
<!-- pencil --><head>Evidence</head></p>
But a reason for the  
<p>But a reason for the admission, <add>has been</add> is in this can <add>found</add> given:<lb/>
I give it to the and undignified
I give it in the words of the living and undignified compiler because <add>commentator,<hi rend="superscript">†</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">†</hi> Peake 152.</note> whose<lb/>
because<lb/>
book is no not yet <gap/></add> in his <add>that</add> book, whatever <add>reason or</add> appearance of reason the nature of the<lb/>
in his birth, whatever appearance of reason the  
case affords is to be found ending not so much as an attempt<lb/>
of such facts, For the purpose of the  
at reason in <add>that far less instruction and accurate</add> the wretched hodge-podge of his dignified predecessor<hi rend="superscript">‡</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">‡</hi> Butler 289.</note><lb/>
to be correct
which have received authority from office and from death from<lb/>
matter of fact
death and office, the sources of authority to the sages of the law.</p>
 
<p><add>"For</add> If this interest were to exclude testimony, there would never be any<lb/>
If falsehood
evidence of such facts."  For the purpose of the argument, admitted<lb/>
 
though in terms rather two strong and indiscriminate to be correct, admitted,<lb/>
For the purpose of the argument
as a proposition <gap/> of a matter of fact <add>protested against</add>:  in the character<lb/>
of a matter of fact
of a reason justifying the <del>exception</del> admission in the character<lb/>
the danger
of an exception, without prejudice to the propriety of the general<lb/>
evidence would be
rule, denied. If falsehood and consequent deception and misdecision<lb/>
rule, devised. If falsehood and consequent deception and misde
were the <add>prevalently</add>more probable consequence of the admission of<lb/>
rule evidence, would less of it be of any to the <lb/>
such evidence, would the loss of it be <add>of</add> any disservice to the interests<lb/>
maximum: suppose the case<lb/>
of justice?  would it not be worse than none?</p>
of a less untrustworthy cast, in danger  
<p>Admitt the absolute <add>necessary</add> non-existence of all other evidence,<lb/>
of this evidence would be proportionally diminished.
the danger, is then, in respect of probability, at its maximum:<lb/>
 
<del>were there other</del> suppose the case to admitt other <add>additional</add> evidence<lb/>
 
of a less untrustworthy cast <add>texture</add>, the danger attached to the admission<lb/>
of this evidence would be proportionally diminished.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:54, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

18 March 1806
Evidence

But a reason for the admission, has been is in this can found given:
I give it in the words of the living and undignified compiler because commentator, Peake 152. whose
book is no not yet
in his that book, whatever reason or appearance of reason the nature of the
case affords is to be found ending not so much as an attempt
at reason in that far less instruction and accurate the wretched hodge-podge of his dignified predecessor Butler 289.
which have received authority from office and from death from
death and office, the sources of authority to the sages of the law.

"For If this interest were to exclude testimony, there would never be any
evidence of such facts." For the purpose of the argument, admitted
though in terms rather two strong and indiscriminate to be correct, admitted,
as a proposition of a matter of fact protested against: in the character
of a reason justifying the exception admission in the character
of an exception, without prejudice to the propriety of the general
rule, denied. If falsehood and consequent deception and misdecision
were the prevalentlymore probable consequence of the admission of
such evidence, would the loss of it be of any disservice to the interests
of justice? would it not be worse than none?

Admitt the absolute necessary non-existence of all other evidence,
the danger, is then, in respect of probability, at its maximum:
were there other suppose the case to admitt other additional evidence
of a less untrustworthy cast texture, the danger attached to the admission
of this evidence would be proportionally diminished.


Identifier: | JB/047/067/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 47.

Date_1

1806-03-18

Marginal Summary Numbering

3

Box

047

Main Headings

evidence

Folio number

067

Info in main headings field

evidence

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

14935

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in