JB/058/186/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/058/186/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/058/186/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/186/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/186/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->16 May 1805<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Evidence</head></p>
 
<p>Another matter <add>general proposition</add> of fact which will be to be brought into view<lb/>
 
in all its details as we advance, is – that in <add>point of experience</add> the state<lb/>
 
of the existing <add>established</add> system of procedure is upon the whole in<lb/>
a state of pointed <add>signal</add> opposition to the <add>every one of the legitimate</add> ends of justice, in a<lb/>
state of close conformity to that sinister end.</p>
<p><del>In <gap/></del> In so remarkable a degree will both those<lb/>
relations be found to exist, that in several countries, perhaps<lb/>
in every country, in England certainly, it may be a question<lb/>
of some doubt whether on the supposition that the interest of<lb/>
the community <del>was</del> <add>having had</add> never been so much as thought of, the<lb/>
<unclear>interest</unclear> of the original <add>professional</add> framers of the system had been exclusively<lb/>
regarded, the <unclear>nature</unclear> of the system could have been more hostile<lb/>
to the interests of the community, more subservient to the interest<lb/>
of the framers, than it is <add>it will be found to be</add> at present.</p>
<p>In the speaking of <add>By</add> the <del>farmers</del> <add>framers</add> of the system I mean<lb/>
profession or class of <unclear>lawyers</unclear>, in all their <unclear>branches</unclear>, as above<lb/>
exhibited <add>enumerated to view</add>:  but this <add>the</add> aggregate requires <add>itself</add> to be explained<lb/>
and justified.</p>
<p>In <add>perhaps</add> every country, <del>and</del> in France and England <add>at least far</add> more<lb/>
particularly, the adjective system, as well as the substantive, is<lb/>
hitherto a piece of patch-work, made <add>put together</add> partly in the form of<lb/>
jurisprudential, partly in the form of statutory law:  the jurisprudential<lb/>
<add>part</add> forming every where the ground, the statutory part  <gap/><lb/>
as here and there at different times, in patches.</p>
<p><del>Of those</del></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 18:00, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

16 May 1805
Evidence

Another matter general proposition of fact which will be to be brought into view
in all its details as we advance, is – that in point of experience the state
of the existing established system of procedure is upon the whole in
a state of pointed signal opposition to the every one of the legitimate ends of justice, in a
state of close conformity to that sinister end.

In In so remarkable a degree will both those
relations be found to exist, that in several countries, perhaps
in every country, in England certainly, it may be a question
of some doubt whether on the supposition that the interest of
the community was having had never been so much as thought of, the
interest of the original professional framers of the system had been exclusively
regarded, the nature of the system could have been more hostile
to the interests of the community, more subservient to the interest
of the framers, than it is it will be found to be at present.

In the speaking of By the farmers framers of the system I mean
profession or class of lawyers, in all their branches, as above
exhibited enumerated to view: but this the aggregate requires itself to be explained
and justified.

In perhaps every country, and in France and England at least far more
particularly, the adjective system, as well as the substantive, is
hitherto a piece of patch-work, made put together partly in the form of
jurisprudential, partly in the form of statutory law: the jurisprudential
part forming every where the ground, the statutory part
as here and there at different times, in patches.

Of those


Identifier: | JB/058/186/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 58.

Date_1

1805-05-16

Marginal Summary Numbering

6-9

Box

058

Main Headings

evidence

Folio number

186

Info in main headings field

evidence

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d3 / e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

18855

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in