JB/013/032/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/013/032/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/013/032/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/013/032/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
together to give the maximum of <del>some</del> security <del>would be</del> <add>this is what</add><lb/>
from beginning to end would be my object:  and it is precisely<lb/>
because they in so great a degree fail <del>of it</del> <add>doing this</add>, that in one sense<lb/>
I should pay no regard to the existing institutions.  <hi rend="underline">No regard</hi><lb/>
the term is <del>quite</del> unfortunately.  <del><gap/></del> <add>No regard yes: yet</add> Great regard.  <hi rend="underline">Great regard</hi><lb/>
for the purpose of seeing how far they <del>has ever</del> <add>fulfil</add>, a fact of <del>ensuring</del> <add>fulfilling</add><lb/>
<del>that</del> the end they <add>appear to</add> aim at, in so far as it is subservient to<lb/>
the only <del><gap/></del> <add>proper</add> universal end:  <hi rend="underline">no regard</hi> at all, for <del>an</del> any<lb/>
such purpose as that of
<p><!-- pencil --><head>To Mora</head></p>
<p><!-- pencil --><head>To Mora</head></p>
<p>Now if so it be, Sir, that on this question <add>subject</add> your opinion<lb/>
<p>Now if so it be, Sir, that on this question <add>subject</add> your opinion<lb/>
Line 33: Line 19:
<hi rend="underline">thing that is <del>done</del> <add>established</add></hi> – <del><gap/> <gap/> what I could not say</del> <add>could I say any thing to this effect</add> without<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">thing that is <del>done</del> <add>established</add></hi> – <del><gap/> <gap/> what I could not say</del> <add>could I say any thing to this effect</add> without<lb/>
the <del><gap/></del> greatest <del>injury to my</del> <add>danger to that same</add> work?  To all <add>valuable</add> possessions taken<lb/>
the <del><gap/></del> greatest <del>injury to my</del> <add>danger to that same</add> work?  To all <add>valuable</add> possessions taken<lb/>
 
together to give the maximum of <del>some</del> security <del>would be</del> <add>this is what</add><lb/>
</p>
from beginning to end would be my object:  and it is precisely<lb/>
 
because they in so great a degree fail <del>of it</del> <add>doing this</add>, that in one sense<lb/>
 
I should pay no regard to the existing institutions.  <hi rend="underline">No regard</hi><lb/>
the term is <del>quite</del> unfortunately.  <del><gap/></del> <add>No regard yes: yet</add> Great regard.  <hi rend="underline">Great regard</hi><lb/>
for the purpose of seeing how far they <del>has ever</del> <add>fulfil</add>, a fact of <del>ensuring</del> <add>fulfilling</add><lb/>
<del>that</del> the end they <add>appear to</add> aim at, in so far as it is subservient to<lb/>
the only <del><gap/></del> <add>proper</add> universal end:  <hi rend="underline">no regard</hi> at all, for <del>an</del> any<lb/>
such purpose as that of preserving or adopting them any further<lb/>
than as they are subservient to that same end.</p>
<p>While the laws <del>is</del> <add>are</add> in its present state, no possession is<lb/>
secure:  all possessions are continually subverted:  <del>to giving</del> <add>to give</add> security<lb/>
to possession is not possible without giving subversion to the laws:  without<lb/>
substituting reality to fiction, order to chaos.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 13:54, 24 July 2023

Click Here To Edit

To Mora

Now if so it be, Sir, that on this question subject your opinion
coincide with mine, there is nothing not in what is above any
thing which I can see any objection to your saying. But
as to my standing up to maintain any such proposition,
observe the consequence. 'Oh (say the lawyers) and so 'this then
'is what you mean to do with our laws: to subvert the whole mass
of them all at once,' not to have leave one stain upon another!
Then comes and with redoubted form, the attack made by
our Serviles upon Parliamentary reform: wild, theoretical,
speculative and visionary: not to , anarchical,
atheistical and mischievous.
He ought to pay not to have regard to any thing he has established
this is what you may say of me, and no harm is done to me
that is to my wished for work. I will have no regard to any
thing that is done established what I could not say could I say any thing to this effect without
the greatest injury to my danger to that same work? To all valuable possessions taken
together to give the maximum of some security would be this is what
from beginning to end would be my object: and it is precisely
because they in so great a degree fail of it doing this, that in one sense
I should pay no regard to the existing institutions. No regard
the term is quite unfortunately. No regard yes: yet Great regard. Great regard
for the purpose of seeing how far they has ever fulfil, a fact of ensuring fulfilling
that the end they appear to aim at, in so far as it is subservient to
the only proper universal end: no regard at all, for an any
such purpose as that of preserving or adopting them any further
than as they are subservient to that same end.

While the laws is are in its present state, no possession is
secure: all possessions are continually subverted: to giving to give security
to possession is not possible without giving subversion to the laws: without
substituting reality to fiction, order to chaos.


Identifier: | JB/013/032/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 13.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

013

Main Headings

rid yourselves of ultramaria

Folio number

032

Info in main headings field

to mora

Image

001

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c3 / d6 / e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[fleur de lys] i&m 1818]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur wellesley, duke of wellington

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1818

Notes public

ID Number

4481

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in